Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, 1959 N.E. Pacific Street, Box 356500, Seattle, WA 98195-6500, USA.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Feb 15;94(4):335-42. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01084.
Surgical site infection after spine surgery is a well-known complication that can result in poor outcomes, arthrodesis-site nonunion, and neurological injury. We hypothesized that a higher surgical invasiveness score will increase the risk for surgical site infection following spine surgery.
Data were examined from patients undergoing any type of spinal surgery from January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2004, at two academic hospitals. The surgical invasiveness index is a previously validated instrument that accounts for the number of vertebral levels decompressed, arthrodesed, or instrumented as well as the surgical approach. Relative risks and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each of the categorical variables. Multivariate binomial stepwise logistic regression was used to examine the association between surgical invasiveness and surgical site infection requiring a return to the operating room for treatment, adjusting for confounding risk factors.
The regression analysis of 1532 patients who were evaluated for surgical site infection identified the following significant risk factors for surgical site infection: a body mass index of >35 (relative risk, 2.24 [95% confidence interval, 1.21 to 3.86]; p = 0.01), hypertension (relative risk, 1.73 [95% confidence interval, 1.05 to 2.85]; p = 0.03), thoracic surgery versus cervical surgery (relative risk, 2.57 [95% confidence interval, 1.20 to 5.60]; p = 0.01), lumbosacral surgery versus cervical surgery (relative risk, 2.03 [95% confidence interval, 1.10 to 4.05]; p = 0.02), and a surgical invasiveness index of >21 (relative risk, 3.15 [95% confidence interval, 1.37 to 6.99]; p = 0.01).
Patients undergoing more invasive spine surgery as measured with the surgical invasiveness index had greater risk for having a surgical site infection that required a return to the operating room for treatment. Surgical invasiveness was the strongest risk factor for surgical site infection, even after adjusting for medical comorbidities, age, and other known risk factors. The magnitude of this association should be considered during surgical decision-making and intraoperative and postoperative care of the patient. These findings further validate the importance of the invasiveness index when performing safety and clinical outcome comparisons for spine surgery.
脊柱手术后的手术部位感染是一种众所周知的并发症,可导致不良结局、融合部位不愈合和神经损伤。我们假设手术侵袭性评分越高,脊柱手术后发生手术部位感染的风险就越高。
我们对 2003 年 1 月 1 日至 2004 年 12 月 31 日在 2 所学术医院接受任何类型脊柱手术的患者的数据进行了检查。手术侵袭性指数是一种经过验证的工具,它考虑了减压、融合或器械的椎体数量以及手术入路。对每个分类变量计算了相对风险和 95%置信区间。使用多元二项式逐步逻辑回归来检查手术侵袭性与需要返回手术室治疗的手术部位感染之间的关联,同时调整混杂风险因素。
对 1532 例评估手术部位感染的患者进行回归分析,确定了手术部位感染的以下显著危险因素:体重指数(BMI)>35(相对风险,2.24[95%置信区间,1.21 至 3.86];p=0.01)、高血压(相对风险,1.73[95%置信区间,1.05 至 2.85];p=0.03)、胸段手术与颈段手术(相对风险,2.57[95%置信区间,1.20 至 5.60];p=0.01)、腰骶段手术与颈段手术(相对风险,2.03[95%置信区间,1.10 至 4.05];p=0.02)以及手术侵袭性指数>21(相对风险,3.15[95%置信区间,1.37 至 6.99];p=0.01)。
根据手术侵袭性指数测量,接受侵袭性更高的脊柱手术的患者发生需要返回手术室治疗的手术部位感染的风险更高。手术侵袭性是手术部位感染的最强危险因素,即使在调整了合并症、年龄和其他已知危险因素后也是如此。在进行手术决策以及患者围手术期和术后护理时,应考虑这种关联的重要性。这些发现进一步验证了在进行脊柱手术安全性和临床结果比较时侵袭性指数的重要性。