• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Central gland and peripheral zone prostate tumors have significantly different quantitative imaging signatures on 3 Tesla endorectal, in vivo T2-weighted MR imagery.在 3.0T 直肠内活体 T2 加权磁共振成像中,中央腺体和周围区域前列腺肿瘤具有明显不同的定量成像特征。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Jul;36(1):213-24. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23618. Epub 2012 Feb 15.
2
Novel PCA-VIP scheme for ranking MRI protocols and identifying computer-extracted MRI measurements associated with central gland and peripheral zone prostate tumors.用于对MRI协议进行排名并识别与中央腺体和外周带前列腺肿瘤相关的计算机提取MRI测量值的新型PCA-VIP方案。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 May;41(5):1383-93. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24676. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
3
Automated detection of prostatic adenocarcinoma from high-resolution ex vivo MRI.通过高分辨率离体磁共振成像自动检测前列腺腺癌
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2005 Dec;24(12):1611-25. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2005.859208.
4
Radiomic features for prostate cancer detection on MRI differ between the transition and peripheral zones: Preliminary findings from a multi-institutional study.MRI上用于前列腺癌检测的影像组学特征在移行区和外周区之间存在差异:一项多机构研究的初步结果。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Jul;46(1):184-193. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25562. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
5
Comparing radiomic classifiers and classifier ensembles for detection of peripheral zone prostate tumors on T2-weighted MRI: a multi-site study.比较基于T2加权磁共振成像检测外周带前列腺肿瘤的放射组学分类器和分类器集成:一项多中心研究。
BMC Med Imaging. 2019 Feb 28;19(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12880-019-0308-6.
6
Spatially weighted mutual information (SWMI) for registration of digitally reconstructed ex vivo whole mount histology and in vivo prostate MRI.用于数字重建的离体全层组织学与体内前列腺MRI配准的空间加权互信息(SWMI)
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011;2011:6269-72. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091547.
7
Elastic registration of prostate MR images based on estimation of deformation states.基于形变状态估计的前列腺磁共振图像弹性配准。
Med Image Anal. 2015 Apr;21(1):87-103. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2014.12.007. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
8
Detection of prostate cancer by integration of line-scan diffusion, T2-mapping and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging; a multichannel statistical classifier.通过线扫描扩散、T2 映射和 T2 加权磁共振成像整合检测前列腺癌;一种多通道统计分类器。
Med Phys. 2003 Sep;30(9):2390-8. doi: 10.1118/1.1593633.
9
A magnetic resonance spectroscopy driven initialization scheme for active shape model based prostate segmentation.基于磁共振波谱驱动的主动形状模型初始化方案在前列腺分割中的应用。
Med Image Anal. 2011 Apr;15(2):214-25. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2010.09.002. Epub 2010 Oct 28.
10
Combined morphological, [1H]-MR spectroscopic and contrast-enhanced imaging of human prostate cancer with a 3-Tesla scanner: preliminary experience.使用3特斯拉扫描仪对人类前列腺癌进行形态学、[1H]磁共振波谱和对比增强成像的联合研究:初步经验。
Radiol Med. 2008 Aug;113(5):670-88. doi: 10.1007/s11547-008-0271-8. Epub 2008 May 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Population-Specific Radiomics From Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Improves Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification in African American Men.基于双参数磁共振成像的特定人群放射组学改善非裔美国男性前列腺癌风险分层
JU Open Plus. 2025 Jul;3(7). doi: 10.1097/ju9.0000000000000310. Epub 2025 Jul 3.
2
ProstAtlasDiff: Prostate cancer detection on MRI using Diffusion Probabilistic Models guided by population spatial cancer atlases.ProstAtlasDiff:利用群体空间癌症图谱引导的扩散概率模型在磁共振成像上进行前列腺癌检测。
Med Image Anal. 2025 Apr;101:103486. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2025.103486. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
3
Synthesizing 4D Magnetic Resonance Angiography From 3D Time-of-Flight Using Deep Learning: A Feasibility Study.利用深度学习从三维时间飞跃法合成四维磁共振血管造影:一项可行性研究
Cureus. 2024 May 21;16(5):e60803. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60803. eCollection 2024 May.
4
Prostate Region-Wise Imaging Biomarker Profiles for Risk Stratification and Biochemical Recurrence Prediction.用于风险分层和生化复发预测的前列腺区域成像生物标志物图谱
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Aug 18;15(16):4163. doi: 10.3390/cancers15164163.
5
Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer Using GLCM Enabled KNN Technique by Analyzing MRI Images.基于 MRI 图像分析的 GLCM 赋权 KNN 技术诊断前列腺癌
Biomed Res Int. 2023 Jan 24;2023:3913351. doi: 10.1155/2023/3913351. eCollection 2023.
6
Introducing new plan evaluation indices for prostate dose painting IMRT plans based on apparent diffusion coefficient images.基于表观扩散系数图像的前列腺剂量画象调强放疗计划新评价指标的引入。
Radiat Oncol. 2022 Nov 23;17(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s13014-022-02163-7.
7
Bridging the gap between prostate radiology and pathology through machine learning.通过机器学习弥合前列腺放射学与病理学之间的差距。
Med Phys. 2022 Aug;49(8):5160-5181. doi: 10.1002/mp.15777. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
8
Robustness Assessment of Images From a 0.35T Scanner of an Integrated MRI-Linac: Characterization of Radiomics Features in Phantom and Patient Data.0.35T 磁共振-直线加速器一体化扫描仪图像稳健性评估:体模和患者数据中放射组学特征的特征描述。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Jan-Dec;21:15330338221099113. doi: 10.1177/15330338221099113.
9
Selective identification and localization of indolent and aggressive prostate cancers via CorrSigNIA: an MRI-pathology correlation and deep learning framework.通过 CorrSigNIA 选择性识别和定位惰性和侵袭性前列腺癌:一种 MRI-病理学相关性和深度学习框架。
Med Image Anal. 2022 Jan;75:102288. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2021.102288. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
10
Advanced Imaging Analysis in Prostate MRI: Building a Radiomic Signature to Predict Tumor Aggressiveness.前列腺MRI的高级影像分析:构建用于预测肿瘤侵袭性的影像组学特征
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Mar 26;11(4):594. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11040594.

本文引用的文献

1
Automated computer-derived prostate volumes from MR imaging data: comparison with radiologist-derived MR imaging and pathologic specimen volumes.从磁共振成像数据中自动计算前列腺体积:与放射科医生生成的磁共振成像和病理标本体积的比较。
Radiology. 2012 Jan;262(1):144-51. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11110266.
2
Elastic registration of multimodal prostate MRI and histology via multiattribute combined mutual information.基于多属性联合互信息的多模态前列腺 MRI 和组织病理学的弹性配准。
Med Phys. 2011 Apr;38(4):2005-18. doi: 10.1118/1.3560879.
3
Prostate cancer characterization on MR images using fractal features.基于分形特征的磁共振成像前列腺癌特征描述。
Med Phys. 2011 Jan;38(1):83-95. doi: 10.1118/1.3521470.
4
Prostate cancer: differentiation of central gland cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia by using diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.前列腺癌:应用扩散加权和动态对比增强磁共振成像鉴别中央腺体癌与前列腺良性增生。
Radiology. 2010 Dec;257(3):715-23. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100021. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
5
Supervised and unsupervised methods for prostate cancer segmentation with multispectral MRI.多光谱 MRI 前列腺癌分割的有监督和无监督方法。
Med Phys. 2010 Apr;37(4):1873-83. doi: 10.1118/1.3359459.
6
Computer-assisted analysis of peripheral zone prostate lesions using T2-weighted and dynamic contrast enhanced T1-weighted MRI.使用 T2 加权和动态对比增强 T1 加权 MRI 对前列腺外周区病变进行计算机辅助分析。
Phys Med Biol. 2010 Mar 21;55(6):1719-34. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/6/012. Epub 2010 Mar 2.
7
Computerized characterization of prostate cancer by fractal analysis in MR images.通过对磁共振图像进行分形分析实现前列腺癌的计算机化特征描述。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 Jul;30(1):161-8. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21819.
8
The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in prostate cancer imaging and staging at 1.5 and 3 Tesla: the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) approach.1.5 特斯拉和 3 特斯拉磁共振成像(MRI)在前列腺癌成像及分期中的作用:贝斯以色列女执事医疗中心(BIDMC)的方法
Cancer Biomark. 2008;4(4-5):251-62. doi: 10.3233/cbm-2008-44-507.
9
Apparent diffusion coefficient: prostate cancer versus noncancerous tissue according to anatomical region.表观扩散系数:根据解剖区域比较前列腺癌组织与非癌组织
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Nov;28(5):1173-9. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21513.
10
Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the central, transition and peripheral zones of the prostate: assignments and correlation with histopathology.前列腺中央区、移行区和外周区的质子磁共振波谱分析:谱峰归属及与组织病理学的相关性
MAGMA. 2008 Nov;21(6):423-34. doi: 10.1007/s10334-008-0136-0. Epub 2008 Sep 17.

在 3.0T 直肠内活体 T2 加权磁共振成像中,中央腺体和周围区域前列腺肿瘤具有明显不同的定量成像特征。

Central gland and peripheral zone prostate tumors have significantly different quantitative imaging signatures on 3 Tesla endorectal, in vivo T2-weighted MR imagery.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.

出版信息

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Jul;36(1):213-24. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23618. Epub 2012 Feb 15.

DOI:10.1002/jmri.23618
PMID:22337003
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3366058/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To identify and evaluate textural quantitative imaging signatures (QISes) for tumors occurring within the central gland (CG) and peripheral zone (PZ) of the prostate, respectively, as seen on in vivo 3 Tesla (T) endorectal T2-weighted (T2w) MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study used 22 preoperative prostate MRI data sets (16 PZ, 6 CG) acquired from men with confirmed prostate cancer (CaP) and scheduled for radical prostatectomy (RP). The prostate region-of-interest (ROI) was automatically delineated on T2w MRI, following which it was corrected for intensity-based acquisition artifacts. An expert pathologist manually delineated the dominant tumor regions on ex vivo sectioned and stained RP specimens as well as identified each of the studies as either a CG or PZ CaP. A nonlinear registration scheme was used to spatially align and then map CaP extent from the ex vivo RP sections onto the corresponding MRI slices. A total of 110 texture features were then extracted on a per-voxel basis from all T2w MRI data sets. An information theoretic feature selection procedure was then applied to identify QISes comprising T2w MRI textural features specific to CG and PZ CaP, respectively. The QISes for CG and PZ CaP were evaluated by means of Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (QDA) on a per-voxel basis against the ground truth for CaP on T2w MRI, mapped from corresponding histology.

RESULTS

The QDA classifier yielded an area under the Receiver Operating characteristic curve of 0.86 for the CG CaP studies, and 0.73 for the PZ CaP studies over 25 runs of randomized three-fold cross-validation. By comparison, the accuracy of the QDA classifier was significantly lower when (a) using all 110 texture features (with no feature selection applied), as well as (b) a randomly selected combination of texture features.

CONCLUSION

CG and PZ prostate cancers have significantly differing textural quantitative imaging signatures on T2w endorectal in vivo MRI.

摘要

目的

分别识别和评估在体内 3 特斯拉(T)直肠内 T2 加权(T2w)MRI 上观察到的前列腺中央腺(CG)和外周区(PZ)内肿瘤的纹理定量成像特征(QIS)。

材料和方法

本研究使用了 22 例术前前列腺 MRI 数据集(16 例 PZ,6 例 CG),这些数据集来自经证实患有前列腺癌(CaP)并计划接受根治性前列腺切除术(RP)的男性。在 T2w MRI 上自动勾画前列腺 ROI,然后对其进行基于强度的采集伪影校正。一名专家病理学家在离体 RP 标本的染色切片上手动勾画主导肿瘤区域,并确定每个研究是 CG 还是 PZ CaP。使用非线性配准方案在空间上对齐,并将离体 RP 切片上的 CaP 范围映射到相应的 MRI 切片上。然后,从所有 T2w MRI 数据集上的每个体素上提取总共 110 个纹理特征。然后应用信息论特征选择过程来识别包含 CG 和 PZ CaP 各自特定 T2w MRI 纹理特征的 QIS。通过将从相应组织学映射而来的 T2w MRI 上的 CaP 作为ground truth,对 CG 和 PZ CaP 的 QIS 进行了基于体素的二次判别分析(QDA)评估。

结果

在随机三折交叉验证的 25 次运行中,QDA 分类器在 CG CaP 研究中的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.86,在 PZ CaP 研究中的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.73。相比之下,当(a)使用所有 110 个纹理特征(未应用特征选择)以及(b)随机选择的纹理特征组合时,QDA 分类器的准确性明显降低。

结论

在体内直肠内 T2w MRI 上,CG 和 PZ 前列腺癌具有明显不同的纹理定量成像特征。