Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012 Oct;55(5):1387-94. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/10-0302). Epub 2012 Jan 31.
A recent hypothesis ascribes dyslexia to a perceptual anchoring deficit. Supporting results have so far been obtained only in children with dyslexia and additional learning difficulties, but the hypothesis has been argued to apply to all individuals with dyslexia.
The authors measured auditory frequency discrimination thresholds in 54 young adults (native speakers of Dutch; 25 individuals with dyslexia; 29 age- and education-matched controls), with a 2-alternative forced-choice staircase paradigm. There were 2 conditions: 1 in which 1 tone in each pair had a fixed frequency across trials (standard), and 1 in which both tones varied in frequency (no standard). Presence of a standard stimulus allows the creation of a stimulus-specific representation in short-term-memory (perceptual anchor).
The standard condition yielded significantly lower discrimination thresholds in both controls and individuals with dyslexia; both groups benefited equally from the presence of an invariant stimulus.
There is no difference between this group of adults with dyslexia and controls in their capacity to form a perceptual anchor. The implication is that an anchoring deficit cannot be generalized to all cases of dyslexia.
最近的一个假说将诵读困难归因于感知锚定缺陷。到目前为止,支持该假说的结果仅在诵读困难和其他学习困难的儿童中得到了证实,但该假说被认为适用于所有诵读困难者。
作者使用 2 种选择强迫阶梯范式,在 54 名年轻成年人(荷兰语母语者;25 名诵读困难者;29 名年龄和教育程度匹配的对照组)中测量了听觉频率辨别阈限。有 2 种条件:1 种条件下,每对中的 1 个音在整个试验中具有固定频率(标准),另 1 种条件下,两个音的频率都在变化(无标准)。标准刺激的存在允许在短期记忆中创建刺激特定的表示(感知锚)。
在对照组和诵读困难者中,标准条件下的辨别阈限明显较低;两组都从不变刺激的存在中受益。
该组诵读困难的成年人与对照组在形成感知锚的能力上没有差异。这意味着锚定缺陷不能被推广到所有诵读困难的情况。