Money, coercion, and undue inducement: attitudes about payments to research participants.
作者信息
Largent Emily A, Grady Christine, Miller Franklin G, Wertheimer Alan
机构信息
Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
出版信息
IRB. 2012 Jan-Feb;34(1):1-8.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Money, coercion, and undue inducement: attitudes about payments to research participants.金钱、强制与不当诱导：对研究参与者报酬的态度
IRB. 2012 Jan-Feb;34(1):1-8.
2
The welcome reassessment of research ethics: is "undue inducement" suspect?对研究伦理的可喜重新评估：“不当诱导”可疑吗？
Am J Bioeth. 2005 Sep-Oct;5(5):15-6. doi: 10.1080/15265160500244967.
3
"Undue inducement' as coercive offers.“不当引诱”作为强制性提议。
Am J Bioeth. 2005 Sep-Oct;5(5):24-5. doi: 10.1080/15265160500245048.
4
Higher magnitude cash payments improve research follow-up rates without increasing drug use or perceived coercion.更高额度的现金支付可提高研究随访率，且不会增加药物使用或感知到的胁迫。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008 Jul 1;96(1-2):128-35. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.02.007. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
5
Undue inducement: nonsense on stilts?不当诱导：无稽之谈？
Am J Bioeth. 2005 Sep-Oct;5(5):9-13; discussion W8-11, W17. doi: 10.1080/15265160500244959.
6
Expanding the frame of "voluntariness" in informed consent: structural coercion and the power of social and economic context.拓展知情同意中“自愿性”的范畴：结构性强制与社会经济背景的力量
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2013 Dec;23(4):355-79. doi: 10.1353/ken.2013.0018.
7
Payments to research subjects.
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2005 Jan;24(1):70-4. doi: 10.1007/BF03351430.
8
Ending concerns about undue inducement.消除对不当诱导的担忧。
J Law Med Ethics. 2004 Spring;32(1):100-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2004.tb00453.x.
9
Undue inducement: the only objection to payment?不当诱导：对支付报酬的唯一异议？
Am J Bioeth. 2005 Sep-Oct;5(5):25-7. doi: 10.1080/15265160500245063.
10
Exploitation in payments to research subjects.对研究对象支付款项的滥用。
Bioethics. 2011 May;25(4):209-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01717.x.
引用本文的文献
1
Acceptability and Feasibility of Using Educational Incentives for Research Participation to Advance Antiracism.利用教育激励措施促进研究参与以推进反种族主义的可接受性和可行性。
Ethics Hum Res. 2025 Jul-Aug;47(4):18-28. doi: 10.1002/eahr.60010.
2
Balancing Parental and Child Interests in Research Subject Compensation.平衡研究对象补偿中父母与子女的利益
J Bioeth Inq. 2025 Jun 17. doi: 10.1007/s11673-025-10436-5.
3
Investigating research study participant compensation practices at a California academic and research institution.调查加利福尼亚州一所学术研究机构的研究参与者补偿做法。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Mar 31;9(1):e103. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.57. eCollection 2025.
4
Current practices by Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers to remunerate research participants.阿尔茨海默病研究中心目前对研究参与者的报酬支付做法。
Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Feb;21(2):e14542. doi: 10.1002/alz.14542. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
5
Characteristics, Motivations, and Preferences of Healthy Volunteers in Phase I Clinical Trials in Sweden.瑞典I期临床试验中健康志愿者的特征、动机和偏好
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2025 Feb-Apr;20(1-2):59-70. doi: 10.1177/15562646241309142. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
6
Expanding first-line options for depression: Protocol of a pragmatic comparative effectiveness trial of yoga vs. behavioral activation (the COMPARE study).拓展抑郁症的一线治疗选择：瑜伽与行为激活实用比较疗效试验方案（COMPARE研究）
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 6;20(1):e0315506. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315506. eCollection 2025.
7
Equity in Clinical Care and Research Involving Persons with Disorders of Consciousness.涉及意识障碍患者的临床护理和研究中的公平性。
Neurocrit Care. 2024 Oct;41(2):345-356. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-02012-3. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
8
Spotlighting Structural Constraints on Decisions About Participation in Genomic and Precision Medicine.聚焦参与基因组学与精准医学决策的结构限制因素
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2024 Apr-Jun;15(2):87-92. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2024.2355893. Epub 2024 May 22.
9
Shifting from Equality toward Equity: Addressing Disparities in Research Participation for Clinical Cancer Research.从平等到公平：解决临床癌症研究参与中的差异问题。
J Clin Ethics. 2024 Spring;35(1):8-22. doi: 10.1086/728144.
10
Operationalizing Equity, Inclusion, and Access in Research Practice at a Large Academic Institution.在大型学术机构的研究实践中实现公平、包容和可及性。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 May;39(6):1037-1047. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08539-z. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
本文引用的文献
1
The Belmont Report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research.《贝尔蒙报告》。保护人类研究受试者的伦理原则与准则。
J Am Coll Dent. 2014 Summer;81(3):4-13.
2
Why do we pay? A national survey of investigators and IRB chairpersons.我们为何付费？一项针对研究者和机构审查委员会主席的全国性调查。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2010 Sep;5(3):43-56. doi: 10.1525/jer.2010.5.3.43.
3
Paying Clinical Research Participants: One Institution's Research Ethics Committees' Perspective.支付临床研究参与者：一所机构研究伦理委员会的观点。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2006 Dec;1(4):37-44. doi: 10.1525/jer.2006.1.4.37.
4
Payment for research participation: a coercive offer?参与研究的报酬：一种强制性的提议？
J Med Ethics. 2008 May;34(5):389-92. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.021857.
5
Undue inducement: nonsense on stilts?不当诱导：无稽之谈？
Am J Bioeth. 2005 Sep-Oct;5(5):9-13; discussion W8-11, W17. doi: 10.1080/15265160500244959.
6
Payment of clinical research subjects.临床研究受试者的报酬。
J Clin Invest. 2005 Jul;115(7):1681-7. doi: 10.1172/JCI25694.
7
An analysis of U.S. practices of paying research participants.对美国支付研究参与者做法的分析。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2005 Jun;26(3):365-75. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2005.02.003. Epub 2005 Mar 28.
8
The influence of risk and monetary payment on the research participation decision making process.风险和货币支付对研究参与决策过程的影响。
J Med Ethics. 2004 Jun;30(3):293-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.2002.001594.
9
Empirical assessment of whether moderate payments are undue or unjust inducements for participation in clinical trials.关于适度报酬是否属于参与临床试验的不当或不公正诱因的实证评估。
Arch Intern Med. 2004 Apr 12;164(7):801-3. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.7.801.
10
Paying research subjects: an analysis of current policies.支付研究对象报酬：当前政策分析
Ann Intern Med. 2002 Mar 5;136(5):368-73. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-5-200203050-00009.
Zotero 插件