Green-Ajufo Barbara, Chakravarty Deepalika, Maiorana Andres, Lightfoot Marguerita, Hamiga John, Rebchook Greg
Project policy analysis and research partnerships manager in the Division of Prevention Science at the Center for AIDS Prevention Studies at the University of California San Francisco.
Bioinformatics programmer and senior statistician in the Division of Prevention Science at the Center for AIDS Prevention Studies at the University of California San Francisco.
Ethics Hum Res. 2025 Jul-Aug;47(4):18-28. doi: 10.1002/eahr.60010.
Nominal cash and gift card incentives provided to research participants have immediate financial benefits but make no lasting improvements to participants' lives or social inequities they might experience. Our study examined the acceptability of offering a nonmonetary educational incentive as an added option to research participants as a potential to advance antiracism and address social inequities. Community members (n = 128) completed a quantitative survey; nine of whom also participated in a qualitative interview. Focus group discussions occurred with 11 researchers. Survey data were analyzed to obtain descriptive statistics. Qualitative data were analyzed using an iterative process guided by template analysis. Survey participants' mean age was 45 years; 39% were white and 30% were Hispanic/Latinx; 80% were male; 39% had completed some college; 45% had a degree; and 71% reported previous paid participation in a research or community program. Of this group, 80% preferred cash or gift card incentives; 16% preferred an educational incentive; and 88% were likely to extremely likely to use educational incentives. Qualitative data indicated that educational incentives were acceptable but should not replace cash incentives; successful implementation would require organizational support. Noncash educational incentives may be acceptable to research participants and researchers and would help address social inequities. Successful implementation would require further research.
提供给研究参与者的名义现金和礼品卡激励措施能带来即时的经济利益,但并不能持久改善参与者的生活或他们可能经历的社会不平等状况。我们的研究考察了向研究参与者提供非货币性教育激励措施作为一种额外选择的可接受性,认为这有可能促进反种族主义并解决社会不平等问题。社区成员(n = 128)完成了一项定量调查;其中九人还参与了定性访谈。与11名研究人员进行了焦点小组讨论。对调查数据进行分析以获得描述性统计结果。使用由模板分析指导的迭代过程对定性数据进行分析。调查参与者的平均年龄为45岁;39%为白人,30%为西班牙裔/拉丁裔;80%为男性;39%完成了一些大学学业;45%拥有学位;71%报告曾有过有偿参与研究或社区项目的经历。在这一组中,80%更喜欢现金或礼品卡激励;16%更喜欢教育激励;88%很可能极有可能使用教育激励。定性数据表明教育激励是可接受的,但不应取代现金激励;成功实施将需要组织支持。非现金教育激励措施可能为研究参与者和研究人员所接受,并有助于解决社会不平等问题。成功实施将需要进一步研究。