Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Room W2041, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:E59. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
Many small-store intervention trials have been conducted in the United States and other countries to improve the food environment and dietary behaviors associated with chronic disease risk. However, no systematic reviews of the methods and outcomes of these trials have been published. The objective of this study was to identify small-store interventions and to determine their impact on food availability, dietary behaviors, and psychosocial factors that influence chronic disease risk.
From May 2009 through September 2010, we used PubMed, web-based searches, and listservs to identify small-store interventions that met the following criteria: 1) a focus on small food stores, 2) a completed impact evaluation, and 3) English-written documentation (peer-reviewed articles or other trial documents). We initially identified 28 trials; 16 met inclusion criteria and were used for analysis. We conducted interviews with project staff to obtain additional information. Reviewers extracted and reported data in a table format to ensure comparability between data.
Reviewed trials were implemented in rural and urban settings in 6 countries and primarily targeted low-income racial/ethnic minority populations. Common intervention strategies included increasing the availability of healthier foods (particularly produce), point-of-purchase promotions (shelf labels, posters), and community engagement. Less common strategies included business training and nutrition education. We found significant effects for increased availability of healthy foods, improved sales of healthy foods, and improved consumer knowledge and dietary behaviors.
Trial impact appeared to be linked to the increased provision of both healthy foods (supply) and health communications designed to increase consumption (demand).
美国和其他国家开展了许多小型商店干预试验,以改善与慢性病风险相关的食品环境和饮食行为。然而,这些试验的方法和结果尚未有系统评价。本研究的目的是确定小型商店干预措施,并确定它们对食品供应、饮食行为以及影响慢性病风险的心理社会因素的影响。
2009 年 5 月至 2010 年 9 月,我们使用 PubMed、网络搜索和列表服务来确定符合以下标准的小型商店干预措施:1)专注于小型食品店,2)完成影响评估,3)英文书面文件(同行评议文章或其他试验文件)。我们最初确定了 28 项试验;其中 16 项符合纳入标准并用于分析。我们对项目工作人员进行了访谈以获取更多信息。审查员以表格形式提取和报告数据,以确保数据之间的可比性。
回顾性试验在 6 个国家的农村和城市地区实施,主要针对低收入的少数族裔人群。常见的干预策略包括增加健康食品的供应(特别是农产品)、购买点促销(货架标签、海报)和社区参与。不太常见的策略包括商业培训和营养教育。我们发现健康食品供应增加、健康食品销售改善以及消费者知识和饮食行为改善方面有显著效果。
试验的影响似乎与健康食品供应的增加(供应)和旨在增加消费的健康传播(需求)有关。