• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

下胫腓联合螺钉取出术的并发症。

Complications of syndesmotic screw removal.

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Traumatology, Reinier de Graaf Groep, Delft, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Foot Ankle Int. 2011 Nov;32(11):1040-4. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2011.1040.

DOI:10.3113/FAI.2011.1040
PMID:22338952
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Currently, the metallic syndesmotic screw is the gold standard in the treatment of syndesmotic disruption. Whether or not this screw needs to be removed remains debatable. The aim of the current study was to determine the complications which occur following routine removal of the syndesmotic screw following operative treatment of unstable ankle fractures.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study with consecutive cases in a Level-2 Trauma center. All patients with routine removal of a syndesmotic screw, following the treatment of an unstable ankle fracture, between January 1, 2004 and November 30, 2010 were included. Complications recorded were: 1) minor or major wound infection following removal of the syndesmotic screw, 2) recurrent syndesmotic diastasis, and 3) unnecessary removal of a broken screw, not recognized during preoperative planning prior to surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 76 patients were included. A wound infection occurred in 9.2% (N = 7) of which 2.6% (N = 2) were deep infections requiring reoperation. Recurrent syndesmotic diastasis was found in 6.6% (N = 5) of patients, and in 6.6% (N = 5) screws were broken at the time of implant removal. In the group with recurrent diastasis the screws were removed significantly earlier compared with the group without recurrent diastasis (Mann-Whitney U-test; p = 0.011) and the group with screw breakage had their screws significantly longer in place compared with the group without breakage (p = 0.038).

CONCLUSION

A total of 22.4% complications occurred upon routine removal of the syndesmotic screw. Removal might therefore be considered only in selected cases with complaints, after a minimum of eight to twelve weeks and using antibiotic prophylaxis during removal.

摘要

背景

目前,金属下胫腓联合螺钉是治疗下胫腓联合分离的金标准。是否需要取出螺钉仍存在争议。本研究旨在确定在不稳定踝关节骨折的手术治疗后,常规取出下胫腓联合螺钉时发生的并发症。

方法

这是一项在二级创伤中心进行的回顾性连续病例研究。所有在 2004 年 1 月 1 日至 2010 年 11 月 30 日期间因不稳定踝关节骨折接受治疗后常规取出下胫腓联合螺钉的患者均被纳入本研究。记录的并发症包括:1)下胫腓联合螺钉取出后出现轻微或严重的伤口感染,2)下胫腓联合再分离,以及 3)在术前计划中未发现的、不必要的螺钉断裂。

结果

共纳入 76 例患者。9.2%(N=7)的患者发生伤口感染,其中 2.6%(N=2)为需要再次手术的深部感染。6.6%(N=5)的患者出现下胫腓联合再分离,6.6%(N=5)的患者在取出内固定物时螺钉断裂。在再分离组中,螺钉的取出时间明显早于无再分离组(Mann-Whitney U 检验;p=0.011),且螺钉断裂组的螺钉固定时间明显长于无断裂组(p=0.038)。

结论

在常规取出下胫腓联合螺钉时,共发生 22.4%的并发症。因此,只有在有症状的患者中,在至少 8 至 12 周后,且在取出过程中使用抗生素预防的情况下,才可以考虑取出螺钉。

相似文献

1
Complications of syndesmotic screw removal.下胫腓联合螺钉取出术的并发症。
Foot Ankle Int. 2011 Nov;32(11):1040-4. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2011.1040.
2
Functional outcomes following syndesmotic fixation: A comparison of screws retained in situ versus routine removal - Is it really necessary?下胫腓联合固定后的功能结果:原位保留螺钉与常规取出的比较——真的有必要吗?
Injury. 2013 Dec;44(12):1880-4. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.08.011. Epub 2013 Aug 20.
3
Removal of Hardware After Syndesmotic Screw Fixation: A Systematic Literature Review.下胫腓螺钉固定后取出内固定物:一项系统的文献综述
Foot Ankle Spec. 2017 Jun;10(3):252-257. doi: 10.1177/1938640016685153. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
4
Fate of the syndesmotic screw--Search for a prudent solution.下胫腓螺钉的转归——寻求合理的解决方案
Injury. 2015 Nov;46 Suppl 6:S125-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.062. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
5
The Fate of the Fixed Syndesmosis Over Time.随着时间推移下胫腓联合的转归
Foot Ankle Int. 2015 Oct;36(10):1202-8. doi: 10.1177/1071100715588186. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
6
The radiographic fate of the syndesmosis after trans-syndesmotic screw removal in displaced ankle fractures.移位性踝关节骨折经下胫腓联合螺钉取出后下胫腓联合的影像学转归
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2011 Jul-Aug;50(4):407-12. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2011.03.014. Epub 2011 May 18.
7
[Is the standard retention of syndesmotic positioning screws after ankle fracture fixation safe and feasible? A retrospective cohort study in 140 consecutive patients at a North American trauma centre].踝关节骨折固定术后下胫腓联合定位螺钉的标准保留方式是否安全可行?一项对北美一家创伤中心140例连续患者的回顾性队列研究
Z Orthop Unfall. 2014 Dec;152(6):554-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1382934. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
8
Functional outcomes after syndesmotic screw fixation and removal.下胫腓联合螺钉固定及取出后的功能结局
J Orthop Trauma. 2010 Jan;24(1):12-6. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181c6e199.
9
High complication rate after syndesmotic screw removal.下胫腓螺钉取出术后并发症发生率高。
Injury. 2015 Nov;46(11):2283-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.08.021. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
10
Syndesmotic screw fixation in Weber C ankle injuries--should the screw be removed before weight bearing?Weber C型踝关节损伤的下胫腓螺钉固定——负重前是否应取出螺钉?
Injury. 2006 Sep;37(9):891-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.02.003. Epub 2006 Apr 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Routine Removal of Syndesmotic Screws After Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Fixation Does Not Affect Patient Function and Is Associated with a Higher Risk of Postoperative Complications.胫腓下联合固定后常规取出下胫腓螺钉不影响患者功能,但与术后并发症风险较高相关。
J Clin Med. 2025 May 8;14(10):3276. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103276.
2
Assessing the Need for Additional Syndesmotic Stabilization in Open Reduction of the Posterior Malleolus: A Biomechanical Study.评估后踝切开复位术中额外下胫腓联合稳定的必要性:一项生物力学研究
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2025 Apr 17;107(12):1377-1385. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.23.01088.
3
A comparison of screw and suture button fixation in the management of adolescent ankle syndesmotic injuries.
青少年踝关节下胫腓联合损伤治疗中螺钉与缝线纽扣固定的比较
J Child Orthop. 2024 Mar 16;18(3):295-301. doi: 10.1177/18632521241238889. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Syndesmotic screws, unscrew them, or leave them? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.下胫腓螺钉,取出还是保留?一项关于随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop. 2024 Mar 22;54:136-142. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.03.012. eCollection 2024 Aug.
5
Meta-analysis of elastic versus rigid fixation in the treatment of acute tibiofibular syndesmosis injury.弹性与刚性固定治疗急性胫腓联合损伤的荟萃分析。
Syst Rev. 2024 Feb 2;13(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02448-2.
6
Functional outcome of routine versus on-demand removal of the syndesmotic screw.下胫腓螺钉常规取出与按需取出的功能结局
Bone Jt Open. 2023 Dec 18;4(12):957-963. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.412.BJO-2023-0061.
7
Dynamic Fixation versus Static Screw Fixation for Syndesmosis Injuries in Pronation External Rotation Ankle Fractures: A Retrospective Case Control Study.旋前外旋型踝关节骨折下胫腓联合损伤的动力固定与静态螺钉固定:一项回顾性病例对照研究
Malays Orthop J. 2023 Nov;17(3):48-58. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.2311.008.
8
Comparison of Risk Factors Between Syndesmotic Screws With and Without Breakage.有断裂和无断裂的下胫腓螺钉之间的危险因素比较。
Cureus. 2023 Nov 5;15(11):e48320. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48320. eCollection 2023 Nov.
9
Short and Middle Functional Outcome in the Static vs. Dynamic Fixation of Syndesmotic Injuries in Ankle Fractures: A Retrospective Case Series Study.踝关节骨折下胫腓联合损伤静态与动态固定的短期和中期功能结果:一项回顾性病例系列研究
J Clin Med. 2023 May 24;12(11):3637. doi: 10.3390/jcm12113637.
10
Biodegradable Zn-Cu-Fe Alloy as a Promising Material for Craniomaxillofacial Implants: An Investigation into Degradation Behavior, Cytotoxicity, and Hemocompatibility.可生物降解的锌铜铁合金作为颅颌面植入物的一种有前景的材料:降解行为、细胞毒性和血液相容性的研究
Front Chem. 2022 Jun 6;10:860040. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2022.860040. eCollection 2022.