• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

下胫腓螺钉取出术后并发症发生率高。

High complication rate after syndesmotic screw removal.

作者信息

Andersen Mette Renate, Frihagen Frede, Madsen Jan Erik, Figved Wender

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baerum Hospital, Drammen, Norway.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Surgery and Clinical Neuroscience, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Injury. 2015 Nov;46(11):2283-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.08.021. Epub 2015 Aug 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2015.08.021
PMID:26319204
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine the rate of complications after routine syndesmotic screw removal.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients who underwent syndesmotic screw removal at our hospital between 2007 and 2012 were included in the study. Patient demographics, surgical characteristics, radiographic evaluation and complications were recorded from the patients' charts. Questionnaires were sent by postal mail to all patients, to measure patient satisfaction and pain (VAS scales).

RESULTS

161 patients were included in the trial. A wound infection was found in 8 (5%) patients. 3 were regarded as serious infections requiring hospitalisation and intravenous antibiotics, 2 of those required surgical revisions. 5 patients were treated by oral antibiotics. Staphylococcus aureus was identified as the causing organism in all (6/8) cases with a positive culture. The patients with postoperative infection reported more pain (5.3 vs. 2.3; p=0.02) and were less satisfied (4.7 vs. 7.6; p=0.014) with their ankle compared to those without infection (T-test for independent samples).

CONCLUSION

There were 5% wound infections after routine syndesmotic screw removal. Routine antibiotic prophylaxis effective against S. aureus should be administered when removing syndesmotic screws. In our institution we now use one single dose Cefalotin of 2g intravenously 30-60min before screw removal.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是确定常规下胫腓联合螺钉取出术后的并发症发生率。

材料与方法

纳入2007年至2012年间在我院接受下胫腓联合螺钉取出术的所有患者。从患者病历中记录患者人口统计学资料、手术特征、影像学评估及并发症情况。通过邮政邮件向所有患者发送问卷,以评估患者满意度和疼痛程度(视觉模拟评分量表)。

结果

161例患者纳入试验。8例(5%)患者发生伤口感染。3例被视为严重感染,需要住院并静脉使用抗生素,其中2例需要手术翻修。5例患者接受口服抗生素治疗。所有培养结果阳性的病例(6/8)中均鉴定出金黄色葡萄球菌为致病微生物。与未感染患者相比,术后感染患者报告的疼痛更严重(5.3对2.3;p=0.02),对踝关节的满意度更低(4.7对7.6;p=0.014)(独立样本t检验)。

结论

常规下胫腓联合螺钉取出术后伤口感染率为5%。取出下胫腓联合螺钉时应给予对金黄色葡萄球菌有效的常规抗生素预防。在我们机构,现在在取出螺钉前30 - 60分钟静脉注射单剂量2g头孢噻吩。

相似文献

1
High complication rate after syndesmotic screw removal.下胫腓螺钉取出术后并发症发生率高。
Injury. 2015 Nov;46(11):2283-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.08.021. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
2
Complications of syndesmotic screw removal.下胫腓联合螺钉取出术的并发症。
Foot Ankle Int. 2011 Nov;32(11):1040-4. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2011.1040.
3
Fate of the syndesmotic screw--Search for a prudent solution.下胫腓螺钉的转归——寻求合理的解决方案
Injury. 2015 Nov;46 Suppl 6:S125-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.062. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
4
Technical aspects of the syndesmotic screw and their effect on functional outcome following acute distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury.下胫腓联合螺钉的技术要点及其对急性下胫腓联合损伤后功能预后的影响。
Injury. 2014 Apr;45(4):775-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.09.035. Epub 2013 Sep 27.
5
Functional outcomes after syndesmotic screw fixation and removal.下胫腓联合螺钉固定及取出后的功能结局
J Orthop Trauma. 2010 Jan;24(1):12-6. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181c6e199.
6
Removal of Hardware After Syndesmotic Screw Fixation: A Systematic Literature Review.下胫腓螺钉固定后取出内固定物:一项系统的文献综述
Foot Ankle Spec. 2017 Jun;10(3):252-257. doi: 10.1177/1938640016685153. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
7
Functional outcomes following syndesmotic fixation: A comparison of screws retained in situ versus routine removal - Is it really necessary?下胫腓联合固定后的功能结果:原位保留螺钉与常规取出的比较——真的有必要吗?
Injury. 2013 Dec;44(12):1880-4. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.08.011. Epub 2013 Aug 20.
8
The management of acute distal tibio-fibular syndesmotic injuries: results of a nationwide survey.急性下胫腓联合损伤的管理:一项全国性调查的结果。
Injury. 2012 Oct;43(10):1718-23. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.015. Epub 2012 Jul 15.
9
Syndesmotic screw fixation in Weber C ankle injuries--should the screw be removed before weight bearing?Weber C型踝关节损伤的下胫腓螺钉固定——负重前是否应取出螺钉?
Injury. 2006 Sep;37(9):891-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.02.003. Epub 2006 Apr 19.
10
[Does removal of the syndesmotic screw improve clinical results of operative treatment of ankle fractures with concomitant syndesmosis injury?].[去除下胫腓螺钉是否能改善合并下胫腓联合损伤的踝关节骨折手术治疗的临床效果?]
Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol. 2010 May-Jun;75(3):143-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-surgical treatment of lateral malleolar fractures is safe: long-term follow-up of a comprehensive treatment algorithm.非手术治疗外踝骨折是安全的:综合治疗方案的长期随访。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Oct 16;25(1):818. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07924-x.
2
A Case Report on a Syndesmotic Ankle Injury Treated With Arthrex TightRope.一例采用 Arthrex 张力带治疗下胫腓联合踝关节损伤的病例报告。
Cureus. 2024 Aug 19;16(8):e67185. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67185. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Is There Any Purpose in Routine Syndesmotic Screw Removal? Systematic Literature Review.
常规下胫腓联合螺钉取出有意义吗?系统文献综述。
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 15;13(16):4805. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164805.
4
A comparison of screw and suture button fixation in the management of adolescent ankle syndesmotic injuries.青少年踝关节下胫腓联合损伤治疗中螺钉与缝线纽扣固定的比较
J Child Orthop. 2024 Mar 16;18(3):295-301. doi: 10.1177/18632521241238889. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Syndesmotic screws, unscrew them, or leave them? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.下胫腓螺钉,取出还是保留?一项关于随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop. 2024 Mar 22;54:136-142. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.03.012. eCollection 2024 Aug.
6
Functional outcome of routine versus on-demand removal of the syndesmotic screw.下胫腓螺钉常规取出与按需取出的功能结局
Bone Jt Open. 2023 Dec 18;4(12):957-963. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.412.BJO-2023-0061.
7
Short and Middle Functional Outcome in the Static vs. Dynamic Fixation of Syndesmotic Injuries in Ankle Fractures: A Retrospective Case Series Study.踝关节骨折下胫腓联合损伤静态与动态固定的短期和中期功能结果:一项回顾性病例系列研究
J Clin Med. 2023 May 24;12(11):3637. doi: 10.3390/jcm12113637.
8
A New Method of Nice Knot Elastic Fixation for Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Injury.新型跟腓联合损伤的 Nice 结弹性固定方法
Orthop Surg. 2023 Mar;15(3):785-792. doi: 10.1111/os.13635. Epub 2023 Jan 29.
9
Do superficial infections increase the risk of deep infections in tibial plateau and plafond fractures?浅表感染会增加胫骨平台和踝关节骨折深部感染的风险吗?
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Oct;33(7):2805-2811. doi: 10.1007/s00590-022-03438-1. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
10
Application of an arched, Ni-Ti shape-memory connector in repairing distal tibiofibular syndesmosis ligament injury.拱形镍钛形状记忆连接器在修复下胫腓联合韧带损伤中的应用。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 May 19;23(1):476. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05449-9.