Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tongji Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200065, China.
Chin Med J (Engl). 2011 Dec;124(23):4050-5.
There is lack of consensus regarding the best option for the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture-operation or non-operation. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to identify and summarize the randomized controlled trials comparing the operative and non-operative lines of treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures.
We searched multiple databases in English (including EMBASE, PubMed, and OVID) and in Chinese (including CNKI, WANFANG, and VIP), as well as reference lists of articles and main orthopaedic and sports medical journals. Two reviewers independently screened the studies for eligibility, evaluated the quality and extracted data from eligible studies, with confirmation by cross-checking. The major results and conclusions were concluded, and the different complication rates and functional outcomes were compared. Meta-analysis was processed by RevMan 5.0 software.
Eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 777 patients met the inclusion criteria. The rerupture rate in non-operative group was significantly higher (Z = 3.33, P < 0.01). However, the moderate (Z = 4.27, P < 0.01) and minor (Z = 5.59, P < 0.01) complication rate in the operative group were significantly higher. No significant difference in comparing the major and total complication rates. The return to work time in the operative group was shorter (Z = 2.65, P < 0.01). The inability to return to previous level sporting rate and ankle joint decreased range of motion (ROM) rate showed no significant difference in the two groups. Other functional outcomes were similar in the two groups.
Operation could significantly reduce the risk of rerupture; however, it was associated with a higher risk of other complications. The functional outcomes were similar in two treatment methods except an earlier return to work in patients treated operatively. Thus operative treatment is preferable for patients with good physical condition. Non-operative treatment is an acceptable alternative especially for the older and patients with lower sporting requirements.
对于急性跟腱断裂的治疗,手术与非手术治疗哪种方法更好,目前尚无共识。本荟萃分析的目的是确定并总结比较急性跟腱断裂手术与非手术治疗的随机对照试验。
我们用英文(包括 EMBASE、PubMed 和 OVID)和中文(包括 CNKI、WANFANG 和 VIP)检索多个数据库,以及查阅文章和主要骨科及运动医学期刊的参考文献列表。两位评审员独立筛选研究的纳入性,评估质量并从合格研究中提取数据,交叉核对确认。总结主要结果和结论,并比较不同并发症发生率和功能结局。Meta 分析用 RevMan 5.0 软件处理。
纳入 8 项随机对照试验(RCT),共 777 例患者。非手术组的再断裂率显著较高(Z = 3.33,P < 0.01)。然而,手术组的中度(Z = 4.27,P < 0.01)和轻度(Z = 5.59,P < 0.01)并发症发生率显著较高。两组在主要和总并发症发生率方面无显著差异。手术组的恢复工作时间更短(Z = 2.65,P < 0.01)。两组在无法恢复到之前运动水平率和踝关节活动度降低率方面无显著差异。两组其他功能结局相似。
手术可显著降低再断裂风险,但与其他并发症风险增加相关。两种治疗方法的功能结局相似,除了手术治疗的患者更早恢复工作。因此,对于身体状况良好的患者,手术治疗更可取。非手术治疗是一种可接受的替代方法,尤其适用于年龄较大和运动要求较低的患者。