Suppr超能文献

手术与非手术治疗急性跟腱断裂的随机对照试验的定量系统评价。

Operative versus nonoperative management of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: a quantitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The State University of New York at Buffalo, 33 Linden Avenue, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2012 Sep;40(9):2154-60. doi: 10.1177/0363546512453293. Epub 2012 Jul 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite several randomized controlled trials comparing operative to nonoperative management of Achilles tendon ruptures, the optimal management of this condition remains the subject of significant debate. Rerupture is a known complication, but most level I studies have not shown a significant difference in the incidence of reruptures when comparing operative to nonoperative management.

PURPOSE

The goal of this systematic review was to identify all randomized controlled trials comparing operative and nonoperative management of Achilles tendon ruptures and to meta-analyze the data with reruptures being the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes including strength, time to return to work, and other complications were analyzed as well.

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis.

METHODS

We searched multiple online databases to identify English-language, prospective randomized controlled trials comparing open surgical repair of acute Achilles tendon ruptures to nonoperative management. Rerupture was our primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included strength, time to return to work, deep infections, sural nerve sensory disturbances, noncosmetic scar complaints, and deep venous thrombosis. Coleman methodology scores were calculated for each included study. Data were extracted from all qualifying articles and, when appropriate, pooled and meta-analyzed.

RESULTS

Seven level I trials involving 677 patients met inclusion criteria. Coleman scores were 95, 95, 95, 89, 78, 97, and 92. Open repair was associated with a significantly lower rerupture rate compared with nonoperative treatment (3.6% vs 8.8%; odds ratio, 0.425; 95% confidence interval, 0.222-0.815). The incidence of deep infections was significantly higher for patients treated with surgery (P = .0113). The incidences of noncosmetic scar complaints and sural nerve sensory disturbances were also significantly higher in patients treated with surgery (P < .001 for each). Strength measurements were not standardized and therefore could not be meta-analyzed.

CONCLUSION

Open surgical repair of acute Achilles tendon ruptures significantly reduces the risk of reruptures when compared with nonoperative management. Several other complications, which are clearly avoided with nonoperative treatment, occur with a significantly higher incidence when surgical repair is performed. The available literature makes it difficult to compare the return of strength in the involved lower extremity after operative or nonoperative management. Future studies may focus on testing strength in a more functional and reproducible manner than isokinetic testing.

摘要

背景

尽管有几项随机对照试验比较了手术与非手术治疗跟腱断裂,但这种疾病的最佳治疗方法仍然存在很大争议。再断裂是一种已知的并发症,但大多数一级研究在比较手术与非手术治疗时并未显示出再断裂发生率的显著差异。

目的

本系统评价的目的是确定所有比较手术与非手术治疗跟腱断裂的随机对照试验,并对再断裂作为主要结局进行荟萃分析。还分析了次要结局,包括力量、重返工作岗位的时间和其他并发症。

研究设计

荟萃分析。

方法

我们搜索了多个在线数据库,以确定比较急性跟腱断裂开放手术修复与非手术治疗的英文前瞻性随机对照试验。再断裂是我们的主要结局。次要结局包括力量、重返工作岗位的时间、深部感染、腓肠神经感觉障碍、非美容性瘢痕投诉和深静脉血栓形成。对每个纳入研究进行了 Coleman 方法评分。从所有合格文章中提取数据,并在适当情况下进行汇总和荟萃分析。

结果

有 7 项一级试验纳入了 677 例患者,符合纳入标准。Coleman 评分分别为 95、95、95、89、78、97 和 92。与非手术治疗相比,开放修复与再断裂率显著降低(3.6%比 8.8%;优势比,0.425;95%置信区间,0.222-0.815)。手术治疗患者的深部感染发生率明显更高(P =.0113)。手术治疗患者的非美容性瘢痕投诉和腓肠神经感觉障碍发生率也明显更高(P <.001 )。力量测量未标准化,因此无法进行荟萃分析。

结论

与非手术治疗相比,急性跟腱断裂的开放性手术修复显著降低了再断裂的风险。与非手术治疗相比,手术治疗还会导致一些其他并发症的发生率明显升高,这些并发症显然可以通过非手术治疗避免。现有文献使得难以比较手术或非手术治疗后受累下肢力量的恢复情况。未来的研究可能侧重于以比等速测试更具功能性和可重复性的方式测试力量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验