Suppr超能文献

孤立性 IgM 相 II 反应对急性 Q 热的诊断具有有限的预测价值。

Solitary IgM phase II response has a limited predictive value in the diagnosis of acute Q fever.

机构信息

Academic Collaborative Centre for Public Health AMPHI, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, GeertGrooteplein Noord 21, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Epidemiol Infect. 2012 Nov;140(11):1950-4. doi: 10.1017/S0950268812000118. Epub 2012 Feb 20.

Abstract

We investigated the positive predictive value (PPV) of a solitary positive immunoglobulin M (IgM) phase II response for the serodiagnosis of acute Q fever detected with either an indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) or an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Initial and follow-up sera from patients suspected of acute Q fever were included if initially only IgM phase II tested positive with IFA in 2008 (n=92), or ELISA in 2009 (n=85). A seroconversion for Q fever was defined as an initial sample being IgG phase II negative but positive in the follow-up sample. The PPV of an initial isolated IgM phase II result detected by IFA or ELISA was 65% and 51%, respectively, and therefore appeared not to adequately predict acute Q fever. For this reason it cannot be used as a diagnostic criterion nor should it be included in public health notification without confirmation with other markers or a follow-up serum sample.

摘要

我们研究了单独的免疫球蛋白 M(IgM)二期反应的阳性预测值(PPV),用于诊断急性 Q 热的血清学检测,该反应采用间接免疫荧光法(IFA)或酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)检测。如果最初只有 IFA 在 2008 年检测到 IgM 二期呈阳性(n=92),或 ELISA 在 2009 年检测到阳性(n=85),则包括疑似急性 Q 热患者的初始和随访血清。Q 热血清转化定义为初始样本 IgG 二期阴性,但在随访样本中呈阳性。IFA 或 ELISA 检测到的初始孤立 IgM 二期结果的 PPV 分别为 65%和 51%,因此似乎无法充分预测急性 Q 热。因此,它不能用作诊断标准,也不应该在没有其他标志物或随访血清样本确认的情况下,包含在公共卫生通知中。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验