Suppr超能文献

急性 Q 热的诊断,重点介绍酶联免疫吸附试验和巢式聚合酶链反应,以及采集血清的时间。

Diagnosis of acute Q fever with emphasis on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and nested polymerase chain reaction regarding the time of serum collection.

机构信息

Institute of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital, Erlanger Allee 101, Jena, Germany.

出版信息

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010 Oct;68(2):110-6. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.06.001.

Abstract

A commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Virion/Serion [Wuerzburg, Germany]), an indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT) (BIOS/Focus [Cypress, CA]), and a nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were explored for diagnosis of acute Q fever in reference to time of serum collection. Serum samples of 22 patients with acute Q fever collected around the fifth day of illness were included. A sensitivity of 30% by ELISA and 80% by IFAT (P = 0.1) was found for the first 5 days of illness and 92% by ELISA and 83% by IFAT during the sixth and eleventh day. PCR revealed a positive result in 8 cases (36%) with 6 cases deriving from the first 5 days of illness. We conclude that ELISA aids especially in the diagnosis of Q fever after 5 days of illness. The benefit of PCR as an additional tool to ELISA was especially evident in the early days of serum sampling.

摘要

研究了一种市售的酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)(Virion/Serion[德国维尔茨堡])、间接荧光抗体试验(IFAT)(BIOS/Focus[美国加州赛普拉斯])和巢式聚合酶链反应(PCR),以评估其在血清采集时间方面对急性 Q 热的诊断价值。共纳入了 22 例急性 Q 热患者在发病后第 5 天左右采集的血清样本。ELISA 在发病后第 5 天内的敏感性为 30%,IFAT 为 80%(P=0.1),而在第 6 天和第 11 天,ELISA 和 IFAT 的敏感性分别为 92%和 83%。PCR 显示 8 例(36%)为阳性,其中 6 例源自发病后第 5 天内。我们得出结论,ELISA 尤其有助于在发病后 5 天内诊断 Q 热。在早期进行血清采样时,PCR 作为 ELISA 的附加工具,其优势尤为明显。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验