Wielders C C H, Kampschreur L M, Schneeberger P M, Jager M M, Hoepelman A I M, Leenders A C A P, Hermans M H A, Wever P C
Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands.
Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2012 Oct;19(10):1661-6. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00322-12. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
Little is known about the effect of timing of antibiotic treatment on development of IgG antibodies following acute Q fever. We studied IgG antibody responses in symptomatic patients diagnosed either before or during development of the serologic response to Coxiella burnetii. Between 15 and 31 May 2009, 186 patients presented with acute Q fever, of which 181 were included in this retrospective study: 91 early-diagnosed (ED) acute Q fever patients, defined as negative IgM phase II enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and positive PCR, and 90 late-diagnosed (LD) acute Q fever patients, defined as positive/dubious IgM phase II ELISA and positive immunofluorescence assay (IFA). Follow-up serology at 3, 6, and 12 months was performed using IFA (IgG phase I and II). High IgG antibody titers were defined as IgG phase II titers of ≥1:1,024 together with IgG phase I titers of ≥1:256. At 12 months, 28.6% of ED patients and 19.5% of LD patients had high IgG antibody titers (P = 0.17). No statistically significant differences were found in frequencies of IgG phase I and IgG phase II antibody titers at all follow-up appointments for adequately and inadequately treated patients overall, as well as for ED and LD patients analyzed separately. Additionally, no significant difference was found in frequencies of high antibody titers and between early (treatment started within 7 days after seeking medical attention) and late timing of treatment. This study indicates that early diagnosis and antibiotic treatment of acute Q fever do not prohibit development of the IgG antibody response.
关于抗生素治疗时机对急性Q热后IgG抗体产生的影响,目前所知甚少。我们研究了在对伯纳特立克次体血清学反应出现之前或期间被诊断出的有症状患者的IgG抗体反应。在2009年5月15日至31日期间,186例患者出现急性Q热,其中181例纳入本回顾性研究:91例早期诊断(ED)的急性Q热患者,定义为IgM II期酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)阴性且PCR阳性;90例晚期诊断(LD)的急性Q热患者,定义为IgM II期ELISA阳性/可疑且免疫荧光测定(IFA)阳性。在3、6和12个月时采用IFA(IgG I期和II期)进行随访血清学检测。高IgG抗体滴度定义为IgG II期滴度≥1:1,024且IgG I期滴度≥1:256。在12个月时,28.6%的ED患者和19.5%的LD患者有高IgG抗体滴度(P = 0.17)。总体上,在所有随访时间点,充分治疗和未充分治疗患者的IgG I期和IgG II期抗体滴度频率,以及分别分析的ED和LD患者之间,均未发现统计学上的显著差异。此外,在高抗体滴度频率以及治疗开始时间早(就医后7天内开始治疗)与晚之间,也未发现显著差异。本研究表明,急性Q热的早期诊断和抗生素治疗并不妨碍IgG抗体反应的产生。