Vaughan Elizabeth M, Rueda Jaime J, Samson Susan L, Hyman David J
Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, University in Houston, Texas, TX 77030, United States.
Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, University in Houston, Texas, TX 77030, United States.
Curr Diabetes Rev. 2020;16(8):851-858. doi: 10.2174/1573399816666200206112318.
The vast majority of individuals diagnosed with diabetes are low/middle income and may have access to only three of the 11 oral hypoglycemic medications (OHMs) due to cost: metformin intermediate release (IR) or extended release (ER), sulfonylureas (glimepiride, glipizide, glyburide), and pioglitazone. Sulfonylureas and pioglitazone have had significant controversy related to potential adverse events, but it remains unclear whether these negative outcomes are class, drug, or dose-related.
We conducted a narrative review of low-cost OHMs.
We evaluated the maximum recommended (MAX) compared to the most effective (EFF) daily dose, time-to-peak change in HbA1c levels, and adverse events of low-cost oral hypoglycemic medications.
We found that the MAX was often greater than the EFF: metformin IR/ER (MAX: 2,550/2,000 mg, EFF: 1,500-2,000/1,500-2,000 mg), glipizide IR/ER (MAX: 40/20 mg, EFF: 20/5 mg), glyburide (MAX: 20 mg, EFF: 2.5-5.0 mg), pioglitazone (MAX: 45 mg, EFF: 45 mg). Time-to-peak change in HbA1c levels occurred at weeks 12-20 (sulfonylureas), 25-39 (metformin), and 25 (pioglitazone). Glimepiride was not associated with weight gain, hypoglycemia, or negative cardiovascular events relative to other sulfonylureas. Cardiovascular event rates did not increase with lower glyburide doses (p<0.05). Glimepiride and pioglitazone have been successfully used in renal impairment.
Metformin, glimepiride, and pioglitazone are safe and efficacious OHMs. Prescribing at the EFF rather than the MAX may avoid negative dose-related outcomes. OHMs should be evaluated as individual drugs, not generalized as a class, due to different dosing and adverse-event profiles; Glimepiride is the preferred sulfonylurea since it is not associated with the adverse events as others in its class.
绝大多数被诊断为糖尿病的个体属于低收入/中等收入人群,由于成本原因,他们可能只能使用11种口服降糖药(OHM)中的三种:二甲双胍缓释片(IR)或控释片(ER)、磺脲类药物(格列美脲、格列吡嗪、格列本脲)和吡格列酮。磺脲类药物和吡格列酮因潜在不良事件存在重大争议,但这些负面结果是与药物类别、具体药物还是剂量相关仍不清楚。
我们对低成本口服降糖药进行了叙述性综述。
我们评估了低成本口服降糖药的最大推荐剂量(MAX)与最有效剂量(EFF)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平达到峰值变化的时间以及不良事件。
我们发现MAX通常大于EFF:二甲双胍IR/ER(MAX:2550/2000毫克,EFF:1500 - 2000/1500 - 2000毫克)、格列吡嗪IR/ER(MAX:40/20毫克,EFF:20/5毫克)、格列本脲(MAX:20毫克,EFF:2.5 - 5.0毫克)、吡格列酮(MAX:45毫克,EFF:45毫克)。HbA1c水平达到峰值变化的时间出现在第12 - 20周(磺脲类药物)、25 - 39周(二甲双胍)和25周(吡格列酮)。与其他磺脲类药物相比,格列美脲与体重增加、低血糖或不良心血管事件无关。较低剂量的格列本脲不会增加心血管事件发生率(p<0.05)。格列美脲和吡格列酮已成功用于肾功能损害患者。
二甲双胍、格列美脲和吡格列酮是安全有效的口服降糖药。按EFF而非MAX开药可避免与剂量相关的负面结果。由于不同的给药方式和不良事件特征,口服降糖药应作为个体药物进行评估,而非作为一个类别一概而论;格列美脲是首选的磺脲类药物,因为它不像该类中的其他药物那样会引发不良事件。