• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Reducing the Burden of Diabetes Treatment: A Review of Low-cost Oral Hypoglycemic Medications.减轻糖尿病治疗负担:低成本口服降糖药物综述
Curr Diabetes Rev. 2020;16(8):851-858. doi: 10.2174/1573399816666200206112318.
2
Triple therapy with glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled by metformin and a thiazolidinedione: results of a 30-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study.对于二甲双胍和噻唑烷二酮治疗控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者,使用格列美脲进行三联疗法:一项为期30周的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组研究的结果。
Clin Ther. 2005 Oct;27(10):1535-47. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.10.017.
3
Cost-effectiveness analysis of thiazolidinediones in uncontrolled type 2 diabetic patients receiving sulfonylureas and metformin in Thailand.噻唑烷二酮类药物在泰国接受磺脲类药物和二甲双胍治疗的血糖控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者中的成本效益分析。
Value Health. 2008 Mar;11 Suppl 1:S43-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00366.x.
4
Effects on the incidence of cardiovascular events of the addition of pioglitazone versus sulfonylureas in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin (TOSCA.IT): a randomised, multicentre trial.吡格列酮与磺脲类药物联合治疗二甲双胍控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者心血管事件发生率的影响(TOSCA.IT):一项随机、多中心试验。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017 Nov;5(11):887-897. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30317-0. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
5
Patterns of medication initiation in newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus: quality and cost implications.初诊糖尿病患者的药物起始模式:质量和成本影响。
Am J Med. 2012 Mar;125(3):302.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.07.033.
6
Efficacy and tolerability of taspoglutide versus pioglitazone in subjects with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled with sulphonylurea or sulphonylurea-metformin therapy: a randomized, double-blind study (T-emerge 6).在磺酰脲类药物或磺酰脲类药物-二甲双胍治疗控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者中,taspoglutide 与吡格列酮的疗效和耐受性:一项随机、双盲研究(T-emerge 6)。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013 Mar;15(3):234-40. doi: 10.1111/dom.12009. Epub 2012 Sep 30.
7
Glimepiride versus pioglitazone combination therapy in subjects with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy: results of a randomized clinical trial.格列美脲与吡格列酮联合治疗对二甲双胍单药治疗控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者的疗效:一项随机临床试验的结果
Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Apr;22(4):751-9. doi: 10.1185/030079906X104786.
8
Pioglitazone hydrochloride/glimepiride.盐酸吡格列酮/格列美脲
Drugs Today (Barc). 2007 Jul;43(7):487-97. doi: 10.1358/dot.2007.43.7.1073850.
9
A retrospective cohort study of economic outcomes and adherence to monotherapy with metformin, pioglitazone, or a sulfonylurea among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the United States from 2003 to 2005.一项回顾性队列研究,评估了 2003 年至 2005 年美国 2 型糖尿病患者采用二甲双胍、吡格列酮或磺酰脲类药物单药治疗的经济学结局和依从性。
Clin Ther. 2010 Jul;32(7):1308-19. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.07.011.
10
Metabolic effects of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone in patients with diabetes and metabolic syndrome treated with glimepiride: a twelve-month, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled, parallel-group trial.吡格列酮和罗格列酮对接受格列美脲治疗的糖尿病和代谢综合征患者的代谢影响:一项为期12个月的多中心、双盲、随机、对照、平行组试验。
Clin Ther. 2004 May;26(5):744-54. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(04)90074-4.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of environmental and dietary exposure on gestational diabetes mellitus: a comprehensive review emphasizing the role of oxidative stress.环境和饮食暴露对妊娠期糖尿病的影响:一项强调氧化应激作用的综述
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Apr 2;16:1393883. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1393883. eCollection 2025.
2
Agonists, Antagonists and Receptors of Somatostatin: Pathophysiological and Therapeutical Implications in Neoplasias.生长抑素的激动剂、拮抗剂与受体:在肿瘤中的病理生理学及治疗意义
Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2024 Sep 2;46(9):9721-9759. doi: 10.3390/cimb46090578.
3
The Role of Dietary Anthocyanins for Managing Diabetes Mellitus-Associated Complications.膳食花青素在管理糖尿病相关并发症中的作用。
Curr Diabetes Rev. 2025;21(9):e15733998322754. doi: 10.2174/0115733998322754240802063730.
4
Trends in antidiabetic drug use and expenditure in public hospitals in Northwest China, 2012-21: a case study of Gansu Province.2012-21 年中国西北地区公立医院抗糖尿病药物使用及支出趋势:以甘肃省为例
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 3;24(1):415. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10917-0.
5
Sex Differences in Neuropathy: The Paradigmatic Case of MetFormin.神经病变的性别差异:以二甲双胍为例。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Nov 22;23(23):14503. doi: 10.3390/ijms232314503.
6
Metformin: Sex/Gender Differences in Its Uses and Effects-Narrative Review.二甲双胍:用途和效果的性别差异——叙述性综述。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Mar 16;58(3):430. doi: 10.3390/medicina58030430.
7
Trilobatin, a Natural Food Additive, Exerts Anti-Type 2 Diabetes Effect Mediated by Nrf2/ARE and IRS-1/GLUT2 Signaling Pathways.三叶苷,一种天然食品添加剂,通过Nrf2/ARE和IRS-1/GLUT2信号通路发挥抗2型糖尿病作用。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jan 27;13:828473. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.828473. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Benefits and harms of intensive glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes.2 型糖尿病患者强化血糖控制的获益与危害。
BMJ. 2019 Nov 5;367:l5887. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5887.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Pioglitazone versus Glimepiride after Metformin and Alogliptin Combination Therapy: A Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter, Parallel-Controlled Study.吡格列酮对比格列美脲在二甲双胍和阿格列汀联合治疗后的疗效和安全性:一项随机、开放标签、多中心、平行对照研究。
Diabetes Metab J. 2020 Feb;44(1):67-77. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2018.0274. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
3
CONSENSUS STATEMENT BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS AND AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY ON THE COMPREHENSIVE TYPE 2 DIABETES MANAGEMENT ALGORITHM - 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.美国临床内分泌医师协会和美国内分泌学会关于2型糖尿病综合管理算法 - 2019执行摘要的共识声明。
Endocr Pract. 2019 Jan;25(1):69-100. doi: 10.4158/CS-2018-0535.
4
Availability and affordability of essential medicines for diabetes across high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries: a prospective epidemiological study.高收入、中等收入和低收入国家的糖尿病基本药物的可及性和可负担性:一项前瞻性流行病学研究。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018 Oct;6(10):798-808. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30233-X. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
5
Efficacy of different antidiabetic drugs based on metformin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: A network meta-analysis involving eight eligible randomized-controlled trials.基于二甲双胍的不同降糖药物治疗 2 型糖尿病的疗效:一项纳入八项合格随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
J Cell Physiol. 2019 Mar;234(3):2795-2806. doi: 10.1002/jcp.27097. Epub 2018 Aug 26.
6
Sulfonylureas as second line drugs in type 2 diabetes and the risk of cardiovascular and hypoglycaemic events: population based cohort study.磺酰脲类药物作为 2 型糖尿病的二线药物与心血管和低血糖事件风险:基于人群的队列研究。
BMJ. 2018 Jul 18;362:k2693. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2693.
7
Pioglitazone Therapy and Fractures: Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis.吡格列酮治疗与骨折:系统评价和荟萃分析
Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets. 2018;18(5):502-507. doi: 10.2174/1871530318666180423121833.
8
Efficacy of oral versus insulin therapy for newly diagnosed diabetes in low-income settings.低收入环境下口服治疗与胰岛素治疗对新诊断糖尿病的疗效比较
Arch Gen Intern Med. 2017;1(2):17-22.
9
Interactions between physicians and the pharmaceutical industry generally and sales representatives specifically and their association with physicians' attitudes and prescribing habits: a systematic review.医生与制药行业(总体而言)以及销售代表(具体而言)之间的互动及其与医生态度和处方习惯的关联:一项系统综述。
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 27;7(9):e016408. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016408.
10
Metformin extended-release versus immediate-release: An international, randomized, double-blind, head-to-head trial in pharmacotherapy-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes.二甲双胍缓释与普通片:一项国际、随机、双盲、头对头临床试验,入组未经药物治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Feb;20(2):463-467. doi: 10.1111/dom.13104. Epub 2017 Oct 2.

减轻糖尿病治疗负担:低成本口服降糖药物综述

Reducing the Burden of Diabetes Treatment: A Review of Low-cost Oral Hypoglycemic Medications.

作者信息

Vaughan Elizabeth M, Rueda Jaime J, Samson Susan L, Hyman David J

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, University in Houston, Texas, TX 77030, United States.

Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, University in Houston, Texas, TX 77030, United States.

出版信息

Curr Diabetes Rev. 2020;16(8):851-858. doi: 10.2174/1573399816666200206112318.

DOI:10.2174/1573399816666200206112318
PMID:32026779
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7415714/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The vast majority of individuals diagnosed with diabetes are low/middle income and may have access to only three of the 11 oral hypoglycemic medications (OHMs) due to cost: metformin intermediate release (IR) or extended release (ER), sulfonylureas (glimepiride, glipizide, glyburide), and pioglitazone. Sulfonylureas and pioglitazone have had significant controversy related to potential adverse events, but it remains unclear whether these negative outcomes are class, drug, or dose-related.

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a narrative review of low-cost OHMs.

METHODS

We evaluated the maximum recommended (MAX) compared to the most effective (EFF) daily dose, time-to-peak change in HbA1c levels, and adverse events of low-cost oral hypoglycemic medications.

RESULTS

We found that the MAX was often greater than the EFF: metformin IR/ER (MAX: 2,550/2,000 mg, EFF: 1,500-2,000/1,500-2,000 mg), glipizide IR/ER (MAX: 40/20 mg, EFF: 20/5 mg), glyburide (MAX: 20 mg, EFF: 2.5-5.0 mg), pioglitazone (MAX: 45 mg, EFF: 45 mg). Time-to-peak change in HbA1c levels occurred at weeks 12-20 (sulfonylureas), 25-39 (metformin), and 25 (pioglitazone). Glimepiride was not associated with weight gain, hypoglycemia, or negative cardiovascular events relative to other sulfonylureas. Cardiovascular event rates did not increase with lower glyburide doses (p<0.05). Glimepiride and pioglitazone have been successfully used in renal impairment.

CONCLUSION

Metformin, glimepiride, and pioglitazone are safe and efficacious OHMs. Prescribing at the EFF rather than the MAX may avoid negative dose-related outcomes. OHMs should be evaluated as individual drugs, not generalized as a class, due to different dosing and adverse-event profiles; Glimepiride is the preferred sulfonylurea since it is not associated with the adverse events as others in its class.

摘要

背景

绝大多数被诊断为糖尿病的个体属于低收入/中等收入人群,由于成本原因,他们可能只能使用11种口服降糖药(OHM)中的三种:二甲双胍缓释片(IR)或控释片(ER)、磺脲类药物(格列美脲、格列吡嗪、格列本脲)和吡格列酮。磺脲类药物和吡格列酮因潜在不良事件存在重大争议,但这些负面结果是与药物类别、具体药物还是剂量相关仍不清楚。

目的

我们对低成本口服降糖药进行了叙述性综述。

方法

我们评估了低成本口服降糖药的最大推荐剂量(MAX)与最有效剂量(EFF)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平达到峰值变化的时间以及不良事件。

结果

我们发现MAX通常大于EFF:二甲双胍IR/ER(MAX:2550/2000毫克,EFF:1500 - 2000/1500 - 2000毫克)、格列吡嗪IR/ER(MAX:40/20毫克,EFF:20/5毫克)、格列本脲(MAX:20毫克,EFF:2.5 - 5.0毫克)、吡格列酮(MAX:45毫克,EFF:45毫克)。HbA1c水平达到峰值变化的时间出现在第12 - 20周(磺脲类药物)、25 - 39周(二甲双胍)和25周(吡格列酮)。与其他磺脲类药物相比,格列美脲与体重增加、低血糖或不良心血管事件无关。较低剂量的格列本脲不会增加心血管事件发生率(p<0.05)。格列美脲和吡格列酮已成功用于肾功能损害患者。

结论

二甲双胍、格列美脲和吡格列酮是安全有效的口服降糖药。按EFF而非MAX开药可避免与剂量相关的负面结果。由于不同的给药方式和不良事件特征,口服降糖药应作为个体药物进行评估,而非作为一个类别一概而论;格列美脲是首选的磺脲类药物,因为它不像该类中的其他药物那样会引发不良事件。