Institute of Integrative and Comparative Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Trends Ecol Evol. 2012 Apr;27(4):203-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.01.004. Epub 2012 Feb 15.
Ecological neutral theory has elicited strong opinions in recent years. Here, we review these opinions and strip away some unfortunate problems with semantics to reveal three major underlying questions. Only one of these relates to neutral theory and the importance of ecological drift, whereas the others involve the link between pattern and process, the tradeoff between simplicity and complexity in modeling, and the role of stochasticity and drift in ecology. We explain how neutral theory cannot be simultaneously used both as a null hypothesis and as an approximation. However, we also show how neutral theory always has a valuable use in one of these two roles, even though the real world is not neutral.
生态中性理论近年来引起了强烈的反响。在这里,我们对这些观点进行了回顾,并消除了一些语义上的不幸问题,揭示了三个主要的潜在问题。只有一个与中性理论和生态漂移的重要性有关,而其他两个涉及模式与过程之间的联系、模型简化与复杂性之间的权衡以及随机性和漂移在生态学中的作用。我们解释了中性理论如何不能同时作为一个零假设和一个近似值来使用。然而,我们还表明,即使现实世界不是中性的,中性理论在这两个角色中的一个仍然具有重要的用途。