• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[急诊科的疼痛治疗:患者怎么看?]

[Pain treatment in the emergency department: what do patients think?].

作者信息

Kosiński Sylweriusz, Siudut Bogusława

机构信息

Oddział Anestezjologii i Intensywnej Terapii, Szpital Specjalistyczny Chorób Płuc w Zakopanem.

出版信息

Anestezjol Intens Ter. 2011 Oct-Dec;43(4):234-8.

PMID:22343441
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pain on admission, especially after trauma, is the most common complaint (over 80%) of patients in the emergency department. During a four-week period, an anonymous, voluntary survey on the quality of pain management was conducted among adult patients reporting to the emergency department.

METHODS

Five hundred questionnaires were distributed during admission, and 260 were returned. Patients were asked about localisation and severity of pain (NRS - Numerical Rating Scale), the quality and speed of assistance in the emergency department, and the effectiveness of analgesia.

RESULTS

Ninety percent of patients reported pain of varying intensity. The median pain scores on admission were 5.2, 7.3 during management, and 3.8 on discharge. Over 90% of patients were questioned about pain, but only 20% received some medication. Nevertheless, 80% of those surveyed were satisfied, and there was no correlation between the severity of pain and administration of analgesics. Fifty percent of patients received analgesics for home use, and 66% were instructed about further treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the frequency and intensity of pain, analgesics were rarely offered in the emergency department. A surprisingly high level of satisfaction was reported, despite suboptimal pain management. This indicates either that non-pharmacologic methods of pain treatment play an important role, or that the severity of pain is overestimated by patients.

摘要

背景

入院时的疼痛,尤其是外伤后的疼痛,是急诊科患者最常见的主诉(超过80%)。在四周的时间里,对到急诊科就诊的成年患者进行了一项关于疼痛管理质量的匿名自愿调查。

方法

入院时发放了500份问卷,回收260份。询问患者疼痛的部位和严重程度(数字评定量表-NRS)、急诊科的帮助质量和速度以及镇痛效果。

结果

90%的患者报告有不同程度的疼痛。入院时疼痛评分中位数为5.2,治疗期间为7.3,出院时为3.8。超过90%的患者接受了疼痛询问,但只有20%的患者接受了某种药物治疗。然而,80%的受访者表示满意,疼痛严重程度与镇痛药的使用之间没有相关性。50%的患者接受了家用镇痛药,66%的患者得到了进一步治疗的指导。

结论

尽管疼痛频繁且剧烈,但急诊科很少提供镇痛药。尽管疼痛管理不理想,但报告的满意度却出奇地高。这表明要么非药物疼痛治疗方法发挥了重要作用,要么患者高估了疼痛的严重程度。

相似文献

1
[Pain treatment in the emergency department: what do patients think?].[急诊科的疼痛治疗:患者怎么看?]
Anestezjol Intens Ter. 2011 Oct-Dec;43(4):234-8.
2
Pain in the emergency department: results of the pain and emergency medicine initiative (PEMI) multicenter study.急诊科的疼痛:疼痛与急诊医学倡议(PEMI)多中心研究结果
J Pain. 2007 Jun;8(6):460-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2006.12.005. Epub 2007 Feb 15.
3
Acute pain and availability of analgesia in the prehospital emergency setting in Italy: a problem to be solved.意大利院前急救环境中的急性疼痛与镇痛药物可及性:一个亟待解决的问题。
Pain Pract. 2009 Jul-Aug;9(4):282-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2009.00277.x. Epub 2009 Mar 16.
4
Outcomes of a nurse-initiated intravenous analgesic protocol for abdominal pain in an emergency department: A quasi-experimental study.护士主导的急诊腹痛静脉镇痛方案的效果:一项准实验研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2011 Jan;48(1):13-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.06.003. Epub 2010 Jul 3.
5
Pain in an emergency department: an audit.急诊科的疼痛:一项审计。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2006 Aug;13(4):218-24. doi: 10.1097/01.mej.0000217975.31342.13.
6
Efficacy of patient-controlled analgesia for patients with acute abdominal pain in the emergency department: a randomized trial.急诊患者中患者自控镇痛对急性腹痛的疗效:一项随机试验。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Apr;19(4):370-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01322.x.
7
Effectiveness of pain management in hospital in the home programs.医院居家项目中的疼痛管理效果。
Clin J Pain. 2012 Mar-Apr;28(3):187-94. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3182290d56.
8
Prehospital pain management: a comparison of providers' perceptions and practices.院前疼痛管理:提供者认知与实践的比较
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2005 Jan-Mar;9(1):32-9. doi: 10.1080/10903120590891705.
9
Adult emergency department patients with sickle cell pain crisis: a learning collaborative model to improve analgesic management.成人急诊患者镰状细胞疼痛危象:改善镇痛管理的学习协作模式。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Apr;17(4):399-407. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00693.x.
10
[Acute pain at the emergency department: better treatment required].[急诊科的急性疼痛:需要更好的治疗]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2011;155:A2241.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of nitrous oxide in comparison to oxygen combined with fentanyl on the hospitalization time and pain reduction in renal colic patients at emergency department.在急诊科,将氧化亚氮与氧气联合芬太尼相比较,观察其对肾绞痛患者住院时间和疼痛减轻的影响。
J Res Med Sci. 2018 Feb 20;23:18. doi: 10.4103/jrms.JRMS_473_17. eCollection 2018.
2
A simplified way for the urgent treatment of somatic pain in patients admitted to the emergency room: the SUPER algorithm.急诊室收治患者躯体疼痛紧急治疗的一种简化方法:SUPER算法。
Intern Emerg Med. 2015 Dec;10(8):985-92. doi: 10.1007/s11739-015-1304-7. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
3
Model determination of delayed causes of analgesics prescription in the emergency ward in arak, iran.
伊朗阿拉克急症病房中镇痛药处方延迟原因的模型确定。
Korean J Pain. 2014 Apr;27(2):152-61. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2014.27.2.152. Epub 2014 Mar 28.