• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国老年男性前列腺癌的前列腺特异性抗原筛查。

Prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer in older men in the United States of America.

机构信息

Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD 20852, USA.

出版信息

Gerontology. 2012;58(4):331-6. doi: 10.1159/000334242. Epub 2012 Feb 16.

DOI:10.1159/000334242
PMID:22343605
Abstract

Prostate cancer, like many diseases, is more common in older men. Although an estimated 1 in 7 men will be diagnosed with it, the majority of these men will not die from prostate cancer. The latent nature of this disease, the use of screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing and the greater risk of dying from causes other than prostate cancer contribute to this disparity. As the US population continues to age, prostate cancer screening and disease management presents an increasingly important public health issue. We discuss the current PSA screening recommendations and practices in the USA and the benefits and harms of screening older populations.

摘要

前列腺癌与许多疾病一样,在老年男性中更为常见。尽管估计每 7 名男性中就有 1 名被诊断患有前列腺癌,但这些男性中的大多数不会死于前列腺癌。这种疾病的潜伏性、使用前列腺特异性抗原 (PSA) 检测进行筛查以及死于前列腺癌以外原因的风险增加,导致了这种差异。随着美国人口的持续老龄化,前列腺癌筛查和疾病管理成为一个日益重要的公共卫生问题。我们讨论了美国目前的 PSA 筛查建议和实践,以及对老年人群进行筛查的益处和危害。

相似文献

1
Prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer in older men in the United States of America.美国老年男性前列腺癌的前列腺特异性抗原筛查。
Gerontology. 2012;58(4):331-6. doi: 10.1159/000334242. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
2
Screening for prostate cancer: the current evidence and guidelines controversy.前列腺癌筛查:当前证据与指南争议
Can J Urol. 2011 Oct;18(5):5875-83.
3
Prostate cancer screening in men 75 years old or older: an assessment of self-reported health status and life expectancy.75 岁及以上男性前列腺癌筛查:自我报告健康状况和预期寿命评估。
J Urol. 2010 May;183(5):1798-802. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.01.002. Epub 2010 Mar 17.
4
Prostate Cancer Screening and the Associated Controversy.前列腺癌筛查及其相关争议。
Surg Clin North Am. 2015 Oct;95(5):1023-39. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2015.05.001. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
5
[Clinical value of prostate specific antigen screening in early detection of prostate cancer].前列腺特异性抗原筛查在前列腺癌早期检测中的临床价值
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2009 Sep;31(9):705-9.
6
Prostate specific antigen best practice statement: 2009 update.前列腺特异性抗原最佳实践声明:2009年更新版
J Urol. 2009 Nov;182(5):2232-41. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.093. Epub 2009 Sep 24.
7
National trends in prostate cancer screening among older American men with limited 9-year life expectancies: evidence of an increased need for shared decision making.美国预期寿命有限的老年男性中前列腺癌筛查的国家趋势:需要更多共享决策的证据。
Cancer. 2014 May 15;120(10):1491-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28600. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
8
Prostate-specific antigen-based screening for prostate cancer: evidence, controversies and future perspectives.基于前列腺特异性抗原的前列腺癌筛查:证据、争议与未来展望。
Int J Urol. 2009 May;16(5):458-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2009.02293.x. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
9
Screening for prostate cancer: prostate-specific antigen testing is not effective.前列腺癌筛查:前列腺特异性抗原检测无效。
Am Fam Physician. 2011 Apr 1;83(7):802-4.
10
Screening for Prostate Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.前列腺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2018 May 8;319(18):1901-1913. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.3710.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic Significance of Serum Ferritin and Hepcidin as Complementary Biomarkers for Prostate Disease: A Prospective Case-Control Study in a Mission Hospital, Ghana.血清铁蛋白和铁调素作为前列腺疾病补充生物标志物的诊断意义:加纳一家教会医院的前瞻性病例对照研究
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 10;8(4):e70642. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70642. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Shared decision making in prostate-specific antigen testing with men older than 70 years.70 岁以上男性前列腺特异性抗原检测的共同决策。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;26(4):401-8. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2013.04.120267.