Suppr超能文献

内镜鼻中隔瓣修复颅底缺损:是否需要添加硬脑膜密封剂?

Endoscopic nasoseptal flap repair of skull base defects: is addition of a dural sealant necessary?

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey 07103, USA.

出版信息

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Jul;147(1):161-6. doi: 10.1177/0194599812437530. Epub 2012 Feb 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We compared the incidence of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks in patients undergoing endoscopic skull base repair with a pedicled nasoseptal flap (PNSF) with or without the addition of a dural sealant.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

Retrospective analysis at a tertiary care medical center.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed at our tertiary care medical center on patients who underwent endoscopic repair of high-flow CSF leaks using a PNSF between December 2008 and August 2011. Repair materials, incidence of postoperative CSF leaks, and demographic data were collected.

RESULTS

Thirty-two high-flow CSF leaks were repaired with a PNSF alone without dural sealant (group A), and 42 were repaired with a PNSF with the addition of a dural sealant (group B). In group A, there were no postoperative CSF leaks (0%), whereas in group B, there was 1 delayed postoperative CSF leak, resulting in a 2.4% leak rate. The incidence of postoperative CSF leakage was not significantly different between the 2 groups (P = .38). The overall postoperative CSF leak rate was 1.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of dural sealants when performing endoscopic PNSF repair of high-flow CSF leaks is not supported by our data. In addition, this practice may significantly increase surgical cost. We encountered no postoperative CSF leaks in patients with high-flow CSF leaks treated with PNSF alone without dural sealants. Meticulous surgical technique and proper positioning of the PNSF seem to obviate the need for dural sealants during endoscopic skull base reconstruction of high-flow CSF leaks.

摘要

目的

我们比较了在接受内镜颅底修复的患者中,使用带蒂鼻中隔-鼻甲骨瓣(PNSF)加或不加硬脑膜密封剂治疗术后脑脊液(CSF)漏的发生率。

研究设计和设置

在三级医疗中心进行的回顾性分析。

方法

在我们的三级医疗中心对 2008 年 12 月至 2011 年 8 月期间使用 PNSF 修复高流量 CSF 漏的患者进行了回顾性分析。收集了修复材料、术后 CSF 漏的发生率和人口统计学数据。

结果

32 例高流量 CSF 漏患者单独使用 PNSF 且未使用硬脑膜密封剂(A 组)修复,42 例患者使用 PNSF 加硬脑膜密封剂(B 组)修复。在 A 组中,无术后 CSF 漏(0%),而在 B 组中,有 1 例延迟性术后 CSF 漏,漏率为 2.4%。两组间术后 CSF 漏发生率无显著差异(P=0.38)。总的术后 CSF 漏发生率为 1.4%。

结论

我们的数据不支持在进行内镜 PNSF 修复高流量 CSF 漏时使用硬脑膜密封剂。此外,这种做法可能会显著增加手术成本。我们在未使用硬脑膜密封剂的情况下,单独使用 PNSF 治疗高流量 CSF 漏的患者中,未发生术后 CSF 漏。精细的手术技术和 PNSF 的正确定位似乎可以避免在高流量 CSF 漏的内镜颅底重建中使用硬脑膜密封剂。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验