National University of Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore.
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2013 Feb;20(1):176-88. doi: 10.1177/2047487311433890. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
Not all segments of society might have equal access to screening. We determined predictors for regular cardiovascular health screening at baseline amongst those of low socioeconomic status (SES) and evaluated the effectiveness of a 6-month intervention on screening in this group compared to a high-SES group.
The study population involved all residents aged ≥ 40 years in two housing estates comprising owner-occupied housing (high SES) and rental flats (low SES) in Singapore. From 2009 to 2011, residents not being screened regularly at baseline for hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidaemia were offered free and convenient blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, and lipid testing over 6 months. Chi-squared and multi-level logistic regression identified predictors of regular screening at baseline; likelihood ratio and Cox regression analysis identified predictors of screening participation post intervention.
Participation was 78.2% (1081/1383). At baseline, in the low-SES group, 41.7% (150/360), 38.8% (177/456), and 30.8% (128/416) had gone for regular hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidaemia screening, respectively; compared with higher numbers in the high-SES group. Sociodemographic factors predicting regular screening in the low-SES community included being married and not smoking. Post intervention, screening rates rose significantly (p < 0.001) by similar proportions in both communities. Staying in a lower-SES community (adjusted relative risk (aRR) 0.61, 95% CI 0.37-0.99, p = 0.048) and having hypertension (aRR 0.45, 95% CI 0.18-0.98, p = 0.049) was associated with lower take-up; Chinese ethnicity (aRR 1.84, 95% CI 1.00-3.43, p = 0.050) and employment associated with higher take-up (aRR 1.57, 95% CI 1.03-2.60, p = 0.040).
Participation in cardiovascular health screening was poor amongst those of low SES; a 6-month intervention programme improved participation in this population.
并非所有社会群体都能平等获得筛查服务。我们确定了社会经济地位较低人群在基线时定期进行心血管健康筛查的预测因素,并评估了与高社会经济地位人群相比,为期 6 个月的干预措施对该人群筛查的效果。
研究人群包括新加坡两个住房区的所有年龄≥40 岁的居民,这些住房区包括自有住房(高社会经济地位)和出租公寓(低社会经济地位)。2009 年至 2011 年,未定期接受高血压、糖尿病和血脂异常筛查的居民,在 6 个月内免费接受便利的血压、空腹血糖和血脂检测。卡方检验和多水平逻辑回归分析确定基线时定期筛查的预测因素;似然比和 Cox 回归分析确定干预后筛查参与的预测因素。
参与率为 78.2%(1081/1383)。在低社会经济地位组中,基线时有 41.7%(150/360)、38.8%(177/456)和 30.8%(128/416)分别定期接受高血压、糖尿病和血脂异常筛查,而在高社会经济地位组中,这些比例更高。预测低社会经济地位社区定期筛查的社会人口学因素包括已婚和不吸烟。干预后,两个社区的筛查率均显著上升(p<0.001),且上升幅度相似。居住在较低社会经济地位社区(调整后的相对风险(aRR)0.61,95%CI 0.37-0.99,p=0.048)和患有高血压(aRR 0.45,95%CI 0.18-0.98,p=0.049)与较低的参与率相关,而华人种族(aRR 1.84,95%CI 1.00-3.43,p=0.050)和就业与较高的参与率相关(aRR 1.57,95%CI 1.03-2.60,p=0.040)。
社会经济地位较低人群的心血管健康筛查参与率较低;为期 6 个月的干预计划提高了该人群的参与率。