Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore.
Prev Med. 2012 Jul;55(1):61-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.04.011. Epub 2012 Apr 26.
Inequalities in cancer screening are little studied in Asian societies. We determined whether area and individual measures of socio-economic status (SES) affected cancer screening participation in Singapore and prospectively evaluated an access-enhancing community-based intervention.
The study population involved all residents aged >40 years in two housing estates comprising of owner-occupied (high-SES area) and rental (low-SES area) flats. From 2009 to 2011, non-adherents to regular screening for colorectal/breast/cervical cancer were offered free convenient screening over six months. Pre- and post-intervention screening rates were compared with McNemar's test. Multi-level logistic regression identified factors of regular screening at baseline; Cox regression analysis identified predictors of screening post-intervention.
Participation was 78.2% (1081/1383). In the low-SES area, 7.7% (33/427), 20.4% (44/216), and 14.3% (46/321) had regular colorectal, cervical and breast cancer screening respectively. Post-intervention, screening rates in the low-SES area rose significantly to 19.0% (81/427), 25.4% (55/216), and 34.3% (74/216) respectively (p<0.001). Area SES was more consistently associated with screening than individual SES at baseline. Post-intervention, for colorectal cancer screening, those with higher education were more likely to attend (p=0.004); for female cancer screening, the higher-income were less likely to attend (p=0.032).
Access-enhancing community-based interventions improve participation among disadvantaged strata of Asian societies.
亚洲社会对癌症筛查中的不平等现象研究甚少。我们旨在确定地区和个体社会经济地位(SES)指标是否会影响新加坡的癌症筛查参与度,并前瞻性评估增强社区参与的干预措施。
研究人群包括由自有住房(高 SES 区)和出租住房(低 SES 区)组成的两个住宅区中所有年龄大于 40 岁的居民。2009 年至 2011 年,为不规律参加常规结直肠癌/乳腺癌/宫颈癌筛查的居民提供为期六个月的免费便捷筛查。采用 McNemar 检验比较干预前后的筛查率。多水平逻辑回归分析确定基线时常规筛查的因素;Cox 回归分析确定干预后筛查的预测因素。
参与率为 78.2%(1081/1383)。在低 SES 区,分别有 7.7%(33/427)、20.4%(44/216)和 14.3%(46/321)定期进行结直肠癌、宫颈癌和乳腺癌筛查。干预后,低 SES 区的筛查率显著上升,分别达到 19.0%(81/427)、25.4%(55/216)和 34.3%(74/216)(p<0.001)。在基线时,地区 SES 与筛查的相关性比个体 SES 更一致。干预后,对于结直肠癌筛查,受教育程度较高的人群更有可能参加(p=0.004);对于女性癌症筛查,高收入人群不太可能参加(p=0.032)。
增强社区参与的干预措施可提高亚洲社会弱势群体的参与度。