Lim Ka Keat, Lim Charmaine, Kwan Yu Heng, Chan Sui Yung, Fong Warren, Low Lian Leng, Tay Hung Yong, Østbye Truls, Tan Chuen Seng
Programme in Health Services & Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Republic of Singapore.
Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Republic of Singapore.
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2019 Jul 1;20:e98. doi: 10.1017/S1463423619000318.
Low socioeconomic status (SES) is a barrier for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk screening and a determinant of poor CVD outcomes. This study examined the associations between access to health-promoting facilities and participation in a CVD risk screening program among populations with low SES residing in public rental flats in Singapore.
Data from Health Mapping Exercises conducted from 2013 to 2015 were obtained, and screening participation rates of 66 blocks were calculated. Negative binomial regression was used to test for associations between distances to four nearest facilities (i.e., subsidized private clinics, healthy eateries, public polyclinics, and parks) and block participation rate in CVD screening. We also investigated potential heterogeneity in the association across regions with an interaction term between distance to each facility and region.
The analysis consisted of 2069 participants. The associations were only evident in the North/North-East region for subsidized private clinic and park. Specifically, increasing distance to the nearest subsidized private clinic and park was significantly associated with lower [incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.80-0.98] and higher (IRR = 1.93, 95%CI: 1.15-3.25) screening participation rates respectively.
Our findings could potentially inform the planning of future door-to-door screenings in urban settings for optimal prioritization of resources. To increase participation rates in low SES populations, accessibility to subsidized private clinics and parks in a high population density region should be considered.
社会经济地位低下是心血管疾病(CVD)风险筛查的障碍,也是CVD不良结局的一个决定因素。本研究调查了新加坡公共租赁公寓中社会经济地位低下人群获得促进健康设施与参与CVD风险筛查项目之间的关联。
获取了2013年至2015年进行的健康地图绘制活动的数据,并计算了66个街区的筛查参与率。采用负二项回归来检验到四个最近设施(即补贴私立诊所、健康餐馆、公共诊疗所和公园)的距离与CVD筛查街区参与率之间的关联。我们还通过每个设施的距离与区域之间的交互项来研究各区域关联中的潜在异质性。
分析包括2069名参与者。这种关联仅在北部/东北区域的补贴私立诊所和公园方面明显。具体而言,到最近补贴私立诊所的距离增加与较低的筛查参与率显著相关(发病率比(IRR)=0.88,95%置信区间(CI):0.80 - 0.98),而到最近公园的距离增加与较高的筛查参与率显著相关(IRR = 1.93,95%CI:(1.15 - 3.25))。
我们的研究结果可能为城市环境中未来上门筛查的规划提供信息,以便对资源进行最佳优先排序。为提高社会经济地位低下人群的参与率,应考虑在人口密度高的区域提供补贴私立诊所和公园。