Suppr超能文献

前哨淋巴结转移的乳腺癌患者非前哨淋巴结状态的预测:特农评分的评估

Prediction of non-sentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node metastases: evaluation of the tenon score.

作者信息

Andersson Y, Frisell J, de Boniface J, Bergkvist L

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Central Hospital, Västerås, Sweden.

出版信息

Breast Cancer (Auckl). 2012;6:31-8. doi: 10.4137/BCBCR.S8642. Epub 2012 Jan 30.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Current guidelines recommend completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) in case of a sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis larger than 0.2 mm. However, in 50%-65% of these patients, the non-SLNs contain no further metastases and cALND provides no benefit. Several nomograms and scoring systems have been suggested to predict the risk of metastases in non-SLNs. We have evaluated the Tenon score.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a retrospective review of the Swedish Sentinel Node Multicentre Cohort Study, risk factors for additional metastases were analysed in 869 SLN-positive patients who underwent cALND, using uni- and multivariate logistic regression models. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn on the basis of the sensitivity and specificity of the Tenon score, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated.

RESULTS

Non-SLN metastases were identified in 270/869 (31.1%) patients. Tumour size and grade, SLN status and ratio between number of positive SLNs and total number of SLNs were significantly associated with non-SLN status in multivariate analyses. The area under the curve for the Tenon score was 0.65 (95% CI 0.61-0.69). In 102 patients with a primary tumour <2 cm, Elston grade 1-2 and SLN metastases ≤2 mm, the risk of non SLN metastasis was less than 10%.

CONCLUSION

The Tenon score performed inadequately in our material and we could, based on tumour and SLN characteristics, only define a very small group of patients in which negative non-sentinel nodes could be predicted.

摘要

引言

当前指南建议,若前哨淋巴结(SLN)转移灶大于0.2 mm,则应完成腋窝淋巴结清扫术(cALND)。然而,在这些患者中,有50%-65%的患者非前哨淋巴结(non-SLN)并无其他转移灶,cALND并无益处。已有多种列线图和评分系统被提出用于预测non-SLN转移风险。我们对Tenon评分进行了评估。

患者与方法

在对瑞典前哨淋巴结多中心队列研究的回顾性分析中,我们使用单因素和多因素逻辑回归模型,对869例行cALND的SLN阳性患者的其他转移风险因素进行了分析。根据Tenon评分的敏感性和特异性绘制了受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,并计算了曲线下面积(AUC)。

结果

在270/869(31.1%)例患者中发现了non-SLN转移。在多因素分析中,肿瘤大小和分级、SLN状态以及阳性SLN数量与SLN总数之比与non-SLN状态显著相关。Tenon评分的曲线下面积为0.65(95%CI 0.61-0.69)。在102例原发肿瘤<2 cm、Elston分级为1-2级且SLN转移灶≤2 mm的患者中,non-SLN转移风险小于10%。

结论

在我们的研究资料中,Tenon评分表现欠佳,基于肿瘤和SLN特征,我们仅能确定一小部分可预测non-SLN为阴性的患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00e5/3273320/a5e026bedf7a/bcbcr-6-2012-031f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验