Kaufmann H, Flammer J, Rutishauser C
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Basle, Switzerland.
Ophthalmologica. 1990;201(2):104-9. doi: 10.1159/000310135.
The introduction of Goldmann perimetry standardized measuring conditions as much as possible. In spite of this, it had been possible for the perimetrist to influence the results of perimeter measurements. The introduction of computer-controlled perimetry, however, has largely eliminated the influence of the investigator on perimetry results. Nevertheless, the interpretation of a perimetric result in the everyday clinical situation is still extensively subjectively coloured and is liable to vary, depending on the doctor carrying it out. The OCTOPUS Program G1 was introduced a few years ago and used above all for glaucoma. This program greatly simplified visual field assessment thanks to its visual field indices. The indices make it possible to compare visual field results with those of a normal population. The present introduction of the OCTOSMART program represents a further step forward. This program analyses measured visual fields with the aid of standardized, statistical criteria based on a large, normal value study. This analysis standardizes and thereby simplifies the interpretation of visual field results. This study compares the outcome of the OCTOSMART program with visual field interpretations by eye doctors.
戈德曼视野计的引入尽可能地规范了测量条件。尽管如此，视野检查者仍有可能影响视野测量结果。然而，计算机控制视野计的引入在很大程度上消除了检查者对视野检查结果的影响。尽管如此，在日常临床情况下，对视野检查结果的解读在很大程度上仍受主观因素影响，并且可能因实施检查的医生不同而有所差异。几年前推出了OCTOPUS程序G1，主要用于青光眼。该程序借助其视野指数极大地简化了视野评估。这些指数使将视野检查结果与正常人群的结果进行比较成为可能。目前OCTOSMART程序的推出是又一进步。该程序借助基于大量正常值研究的标准化统计标准分析测量的视野。这种分析使视野检查结果的解读标准化，从而简化了该解读。本研究将OCTOSMART程序的结果与眼科医生对视野的解读进行了比较。
