Swiss Center for Affective Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Cogn Emot. 2012;26(5):885-98. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2011.628301. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
The investigation of the semantic space associated with subjective affective experiences or feelings linked to odour perception has recently emerged. Because of the specificity of the emotional effects of odours, the terms derived from traditional models of emotion are unlikely to optimally account for odour-associated feelings. In this study, sets of terms derived from two traditional models, basic emotions and valence by arousal by dominance dimensional emotions, were compared with a recently elaborated olfaction-specific set of terms (Geneva Emotion and Odour Scale; GEOS). Three main criteria were considered: (1) the feeling's intensity reported in response to odours; (2) the inter-rater agreement concerning the reported feelings; and (3) the power to discriminate feelings evoked by various odorous substances. The evidence strongly suggested that the set of terms proposed by GEOS outperformed the terms derived from the two classical models in measuring the subjective affective experience elicited by odours. These results are interpreted with respect to a good correspondence between the functions of olfaction and the meaning conveyed by GEOS terms.
近年来,人们开始研究与气味感知相关的主观情感体验或感觉的语义空间。由于气味的情感效应具有特殊性,因此传统情感模型中得出的术语不太可能最佳地描述与气味相关的感觉。在这项研究中,两组术语分别来自两个传统模型,即基本情绪和由唤醒度和优势度维度情绪得出的术语,与最近精心设计的特定于嗅觉的术语(日内瓦情感和气味量表;GEOS)进行了比较。主要考虑了三个标准:(1)对气味的反应中报告的感觉强度;(2)报告的感觉的评分者间一致性;(3)区分各种气味物质引起的感觉的能力。研究结果强烈表明,在测量气味引起的主观情感体验方面,GEOS 提出的术语优于从两个经典模型中得出的术语。这些结果是根据嗅觉的功能与 GEOS 术语所传达的含义之间的良好对应关系来解释的。