Aicher Sue A, Randich Alan
Department of Psychology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242 U.S.A.
Pain. 1990 Jul;42(1):103-119. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(90)91096-2.
In experiment 1, quantitative regional comparisons of the antinociceptive and cardiovascular responses produced by electrical stimulation in the caudal medulla, including regions such as the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS), nucleus reticularis ventralis (NRV), nucleus reticularis gigantocellularis (NRGC), nucleus reticularis paragigantocellularis (NRPGC), nucleus raphe obscurus (NRO), and medial portions of the lateral reticular nucleus (LRN), were made in the rat. Electrical stimulation in all of these regions resulted in inhibition of the nociceptive tail-flick reflex, although the threshold intensity for inhibition was greater for sites in NTS compared to many sites ventral to the NTS. Antinociception was generally accompanied by an increase in mean arterial blood pressure, with the exception of sites in the NRO, where depressor responses were evoked by stimulation. Detailed comparisons between the NTS and NRV revealed that greater intensities of electrical stimulation were required to produce antinociception for sites in the NTS as compared to the NRV. There were no significant differences in threshold intensities for antinociception as a function of rostrocaudal subdivisions of the NTS, but the lateral subdivision of the NTS was significantly more efficacious than the medial subdivision. This mediolateral difference within NTS was primarily due to stimulation in medial sites producing overt movements in some animals, probably due to stimulation of adjacent midline nuclei or pathways. Within the NRV, thresholds for inhibition of the tail-flick reflex were greater for sites in the dorsal subdivision as compared to the ventral subdivision, which contains spinopetal projections from the NRM. The slopes of the lines of recruitment for inhibition of the tail-flick reflex at stimulation sites in either the NTS or NRV were both very steep, similar to other forms of antinociception. In experiment 2, the pulse duration of electrical stimulation was varied for sites of stimulation in the lateral NTS and NRV to generate strength-duration curves. This experiment confirmed that stimulation sites in the lateral NTS required greater current intensities to inhibit the tail-flick reflex than sites in the NRV. However, the chronaxies derived from the strength-duration functions for the NTS or NRV were both approximately 170 microseconds, indicating that the antinociceptive effects in these regions may not be exclusively due to the stimulation of fibers of passage. These results are discussed in terms of the role of the NTS, NRV, and caudal medulla in the modulation of nociceptive responses and cardiovascular function.
在实验1中,对大鼠延髓尾部电刺激产生的抗伤害感受和心血管反应进行了定量区域比较,这些区域包括孤束核(NTS)、腹侧网状核(NRV)、巨细胞网状核(NRGC)、旁巨细胞网状核(NRPGC)、中缝隐核(NRO)以及外侧网状核(LRN)的内侧部分。所有这些区域的电刺激均导致伤害性甩尾反射受到抑制,不过与NTS腹侧的许多部位相比,NTS部位的抑制阈值强度更高。除了NRO部位,刺激该部位会引发降压反应外,抗伤害感受通常伴随着平均动脉血压升高。NTS和NRV之间的详细比较显示,与NRV相比,NTS部位产生抗伤害感受所需的电刺激强度更大。作为NTS尾头部分细分的函数,抗伤害感受的阈值强度没有显著差异,但NTS的外侧细分比内侧细分显著更有效。NTS内的这种内外侧差异主要是由于内侧部位的刺激在一些动物中产生了明显的运动,这可能是由于刺激了相邻的中线核或通路。在NRV内,与包含从延髓头端腹内侧网状核(NRM)向心性投射的腹侧细分相比,背侧细分部位的甩尾反射抑制阈值更高。在NTS或NRV的刺激部位,抑制甩尾反射的募集线斜率都非常陡峭,这与其他形式的抗伤害感受相似。在实验2中,改变了外侧NTS和NRV刺激部位的电刺激脉冲持续时间,以生成强度-持续时间曲线。该实验证实,外侧NTS的刺激部位比NRV的刺激部位需要更大的电流强度来抑制甩尾反射。然而,从NTS或NRV的强度-持续时间函数得出的时值均约为170微秒,这表明这些区域的抗伤害感受作用可能并非完全归因于对通过纤维的刺激。根据NTS、NRV和延髓尾部在伤害性反应和心血管功能调节中的作用对这些结果进行了讨论。