UPMC Eye Center, University of Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Brain Struct Funct. 2012 Jul;217(3):761-5. doi: 10.1007/s00429-012-0392-7. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
We have observed dramatic effects of tactile tongue stimulation on nystagmus eye movements in patients with acquired blindness, and we report these results. Six adult subjects (3 subjects with light perception or worse vision and 3 normal subjects) were included in this study. Causes of blindness included traumatic explosion, anterior ischemic optic neuropathy, and central retinal artery occlusion. Duration of blindness was 15, 3 and 1.5 years, respectively. A video eye tracking system (Eyelink 1000) was used to record eye movements. The eye movement recording (EMR) was repeated four times in a span of 20 min. Two of the EMRs were performed without tongue stimulation and two with tongue stimulation in randomized order. A tongue stimulus was applied to the surface of the tongue using a Brainport device that produces an electrical tactile stimulus. The nystagmus waveform characteristics and frequency were analyzed. We found that all blind subjects showed continuous jerk nystagmus with slow and quick phases, mainly in horizontal plane in their primary eye positions. The recorded nystagmus waveforms were jerk with linear velocity slow phases. When the tongue stimulus was applied, the frequency of nystagmus was significantly reduced by 47, 40, and 11%, and relative amplitude was reduced by 43, 45, and 6% for three blind subjects, respectively. In conclusion, we think our results that tongue stimulation influences nystagmus eye movements support a link between non-visual sensory input and ocular motor activity.
我们观察到触觉舌刺激对获得性盲患者眼球震颤眼动的显著影响,并报告了这些结果。本研究纳入了 6 名成年受试者(3 名光感或更差视力和 3 名正常受试者)。失明的原因包括外伤性爆炸、前部缺血性视神经病变和视网膜中央动脉阻塞。失明的持续时间分别为 15、3 和 1.5 年。使用视频眼动跟踪系统(Eyelink 1000)记录眼动。在 20 分钟的时间内重复进行 4 次眼动记录(EMR)。其中 2 次 EMR 在无舌刺激和随机顺序的舌刺激下进行。使用 Brainport 设备将电触觉刺激施加到舌表面以产生舌刺激。分析眼球震颤波形特征和频率。我们发现所有盲人在原发性眼位主要在水平面上均表现出具有慢相和快相的连续急动眼球震颤。记录的眼球震颤波形为具有线性速度慢相的急动。当施加舌刺激时,3 名盲人的眼球震颤频率分别显著降低了 47%、40%和 11%,相对振幅分别降低了 43%、45%和 6%。总之,我们认为我们的结果表明,舌刺激影响眼球震颤眼动,支持非视觉感觉输入与眼动活动之间的联系。