Cardiff Institute of Society and Health, Cardiff School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, 1-3 Museum Place, Cardiff, CF10 3BD, UK.
Health Educ Res. 2012 Jun;27(3):459-69. doi: 10.1093/her/cys017. Epub 2012 Feb 20.
Preventing smoking initiation among adolescents of lower socio-economic groups is crucial for the reduction of socio-economic inequalities in health. The aim of the present study was to examine whether effective smoking prevention interventions in Europe are equally effective among adolescents of low- and high-socio-economic status (SES). As part of the European Union-funded TEENAGE project, three school-based smoking prevention intervention studies in Europe were selected for secondary analyses: (i) a Dutch class competition intervention, (ii) the European Smoking Prevention Framework (ESFA) study and (iii) the A Stop Smoking in Schools Trial (ASSIST) intervention. All three studies differed in effectiveness by SES. The Dutch class competition study only had a significant effect among higher SES adolescents. The results for the ESFA study and ASSIST study were mixed and depended on which SES indicator was used. The conclusion of the study is that stratified analyses provide important insights in differential intervention effects for higher and lower socio-economic groups. Although findings from the different studies were mixed, interventions that use a social network approach in which youngsters are allowed to deliver the intervention themselves may be a successful strategy in targeting adolescents from lower socio-economic groups.
预防社会经济地位较低的青少年吸烟是减少健康方面社会经济不平等的关键。本研究旨在检验在欧洲,有效的青少年吸烟预防干预措施在社会经济地位较低和较高的青少年中是否同样有效。作为欧盟资助的 TEENAGE 项目的一部分,对欧洲的三项基于学校的吸烟预防干预研究进行了二次分析:(一)荷兰班级竞赛干预,(二)欧洲吸烟预防框架(ESFA)研究,(三)学校戒烟试验(ASSIST)干预。所有三项研究的效果都因社会经济地位而异。荷兰班级竞赛研究仅对较高社会经济地位的青少年有显著效果。ESFA 研究和 ASSIST 研究的结果则是混合的,这取决于所使用的社会经济地位指标。该研究的结论是,分层分析为针对较高和较低社会经济群体的干预效果提供了重要的见解。尽管来自不同研究的发现是混合的,但使用社交网络方法的干预措施,让年轻人自己实施干预,可能是针对社会经济地位较低的青少年的一个成功策略。