• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于学校的吸烟预防干预中青少年吸烟和使用替代烟草产品的社会经济差异:来自 X:IT II 研究第二年的发现。

Socioeconomic Differences in Cigarette Smoking and Alternative Tobacco Product Use Among Adolescents in a School-Based Smoking Preventive Intervention: Findings From the Second Year of the X:IT II Study.

机构信息

National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2022 Feb 21;10:825585. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.825585. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2022.825585
PMID:35265577
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8900944/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health interventions may differently impact adolescents from diverse backgrounds. This study examined whether a smoking preventive intervention was equally effective in preventing cigarette smoking and use of alternative tobacco products (ATPs, i.e., snus, e-cigarettes, and waterpipe) among students from different socioeconomic backgrounds, i.e., occupational social classes (OSC).

METHODS

Data was from the school-based intervention X:IT II targeting 13- to 15-year-olds Danes. The intervention focused on three main components: smoke-free school time, smoke-free curriculum, and parental involvement. In total, 46 schools were included at baseline ( = 2,307, response rate = 86.3%). Using a difference-in-differences approach, changes in current smoking and ever use of ATPs were estimated among students in high versus low OSC at second follow-up. Analyses were based on available cases ( = 826) and multiple imputations of missing data at the second follow-up ( = 1,965).

RESULTS

At baseline (age 13), 1.0% of students from high OSC and 4.8% from low OSC currently smoked cigarettes, while this was the case among 24.5 and 25.6%, respectively, at the second follow-up (age 15). Estimates indicated that social inequalities in current smoking diminished over time ( < 0.001). Regarding ATPs, 10.0% of high OSC students and 13.9% of low OSC students had ever used ATPs at baseline, while at second follow-up, 46.8 and 60.8%, respectively, had ever used ATPs. Estimates indicated that social inequalities in ever use of ATPs widened over time ( < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The X:IT II intervention seemed to diminish socioeconomic disparities in smoking over the study period. Meanwhile, social inequalities in ever use of ATPs increased. Therefore, besides focusing on narrowing the social disparities in cigarette smoking, future efforts may, to a larger extent, focus on adolescents' use of ATPs.

摘要

背景

健康干预措施可能对来自不同背景的青少年产生不同的影响。本研究旨在检验一项预防吸烟的干预措施在预防不同社会经济背景(即职业社会阶层,OSC)学生吸烟和使用替代烟草产品(ATP,即鼻烟、电子烟和水烟)方面是否同样有效。

方法

数据来自针对 13 至 15 岁丹麦学生的基于学校的 X:IT II 干预研究。该干预措施侧重于三个主要组成部分:无烟课间时间、无烟课程和家长参与。共有 46 所学校在基线时被纳入(n=2307,响应率为 86.3%)。使用差异中的差异方法,在第二次随访时,根据 OSC 高低,评估学生中当前吸烟和曾经使用 ATP 的变化。分析基于可用病例(n=826)和第二次随访时缺失数据的多重插补(n=1965)。

结果

在基线时(13 岁),来自高 OSC 的 1.0%的学生目前吸烟,而来自低 OSC 的这一比例为 4.8%,而在第二次随访时(15 岁),这一比例分别为 24.5%和 25.6%。估计表明,当前吸烟的社会不平等随着时间的推移而减少(<0.001)。关于 ATP,10.0%的高 OSC 学生和 13.9%的低 OSC 学生在基线时曾经使用过 ATP,而在第二次随访时,分别有 46.8%和 60.8%的学生曾经使用过 ATP。估计表明,ATP 曾经使用的社会不平等随着时间的推移而扩大(<0.001)。

结论

X:IT II 干预似乎在研究期间缩小了吸烟方面的社会经济差距。与此同时,ATP 曾经使用的社会不平等有所增加。因此,除了关注缩小吸烟的社会差距外,未来的努力可能在更大程度上侧重于青少年对 ATP 的使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18be/8900944/f10340c74eaa/fpubh-10-825585-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18be/8900944/ceedc53ab1c0/fpubh-10-825585-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18be/8900944/a5dda800b85f/fpubh-10-825585-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18be/8900944/f10340c74eaa/fpubh-10-825585-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18be/8900944/ceedc53ab1c0/fpubh-10-825585-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18be/8900944/a5dda800b85f/fpubh-10-825585-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18be/8900944/f10340c74eaa/fpubh-10-825585-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Socioeconomic Differences in Cigarette Smoking and Alternative Tobacco Product Use Among Adolescents in a School-Based Smoking Preventive Intervention: Findings From the Second Year of the X:IT II Study.基于学校的吸烟预防干预中青少年吸烟和使用替代烟草产品的社会经济差异:来自 X:IT II 研究第二年的发现。
Front Public Health. 2022 Feb 21;10:825585. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.825585. eCollection 2022.
2
Socio-economic differences in smoking among adolescents in a school-based smoking intervention: The X:IT II study.基于学校的吸烟干预中青少年吸烟的社会经济差异:X:IT II 研究。
Scand J Public Health. 2021 Dec;49(8):961-969. doi: 10.1177/14034948211007683. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
3
Who are the young users of tobacco products? Prevalence and characteristics of Danish adolescents who have either smoked cigarettes, used alternative tobacco products, or used both.烟草产品的年轻使用者都有谁?吸食香烟、使用其他烟草产品或两者皆用的丹麦青少年的流行情况及特征。
Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2021 Dec;38(6):555-572. doi: 10.1177/14550725211027687. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
4
Effects of reduced-risk nicotine-delivery products on smoking prevalence and cigarette sales: an observational study.降低风险尼古丁传递产品对吸烟率和香烟销售的影响:一项观察性研究。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2023 Sep;11(7):1-39. doi: 10.3310/RPDN7327.
5
Association of Electronic Cigarette Use With Initiation of Combustible Tobacco Product Smoking in Early Adolescence.电子烟使用与青少年早期开始吸食可燃烟草制品之间的关联。
JAMA. 2015 Aug 18;314(7):700-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.8950.
6
E-cigarette and waterpipe use in two adolescent cohorts: cross-sectional and longitudinal associations with conventional cigarette smoking.电子香烟和水烟在两个青少年群体中的使用:与传统香烟吸烟的横断面和纵向关联。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2018 Mar;33(3):323-334. doi: 10.1007/s10654-017-0345-9. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
7
Longitudinal study of e-cigarette use and onset of cigarette smoking among high school students in Hawaii.夏威夷高中生电子烟使用与开始吸烟的纵向研究。
Tob Control. 2017 Jan;26(1):34-39. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052705. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
8
Use of electronic cigarettes among secondary and high school students from a socially disadvantaged rural area in Poland.波兰一个社会经济条件不利的农村地区的初中生和高中生使用电子烟的情况。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 3;15:703. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3417-y.
9
Heat-not-burn tobacco, electronic cigarettes, and combustible cigarette use among Japanese adolescents: a nationwide population survey 2017.加热不燃烧烟草制品、电子烟和可燃卷烟在日本青少年中的使用:2017 年全国人群调查。
BMC Public Health. 2020 May 20;20(1):741. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08916-x.
10
Patterns of alternative tobacco product experimentation among ever smoker adolescents.曾经吸烟的青少年中使用替代烟草产品的尝试模式。
Cent Eur J Public Health. 2019 Mar;27(1):3-9. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a5364.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of Health Belief Model-Based Creative Drama Education on Health Locus of Control and Smoking Perception in Adolescents: A Randomized Controlled Trial.基于健康信念模型的创意戏剧教育对青少年健康控制点和吸烟认知的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Public Health Nurs. 2025 May-Jun;42(3):1343-1353. doi: 10.1111/phn.13550. Epub 2025 Mar 6.
2
Effect of a multicomponent school-based intervention with parental involvement on socioeconomic inequalities in smoking initiation: equity impact analysis of the TOPAS study.一项有家长参与的多成分校本干预对吸烟起始阶段社会经济不平等的影响:TOPAS研究的公平性影响分析
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2025 Feb 10;79(3):227-232. doi: 10.1136/jech-2024-222463.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Who are the young users of tobacco products? Prevalence and characteristics of Danish adolescents who have either smoked cigarettes, used alternative tobacco products, or used both.烟草产品的年轻使用者都有谁?吸食香烟、使用其他烟草产品或两者皆用的丹麦青少年的流行情况及特征。
Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2021 Dec;38(6):555-572. doi: 10.1177/14550725211027687. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
2
Socio-economic differences in smoking among adolescents in a school-based smoking intervention: The X:IT II study.基于学校的吸烟干预中青少年吸烟的社会经济差异:X:IT II 研究。
Scand J Public Health. 2021 Dec;49(8):961-969. doi: 10.1177/14034948211007683. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
3
Do school-based smoking preventive interventions have unintended effects? Post hoc analysis of the Focus cluster randomised controlled trial.
基于学校的吸烟预防干预措施是否有意外影响?聚焦群组随机对照试验的事后分析。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 8;14(1):e070176. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070176.
Gender and socioeconomic disparities in reasons for not smoking cigarettes among Danish adolescents.
丹麦青少年不吸烟原因中的性别和社会经济差异。
BMC Res Notes. 2021 Jan 23;14(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13104-021-05454-6.
4
Swedish snus use is associated with mortality: a pooled analysis of eight prospective studies.使用瑞典鼻烟与死亡率相关:八项前瞻性研究的汇总分析。
Int J Epidemiol. 2021 Jan 23;49(6):2041-2050. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaa197.
5
Smoking Intention and Progression From E-Cigarette Use to Cigarette Smoking.电子烟使用向香烟使用的意愿和进展。
Pediatrics. 2020 Dec;146(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-002881. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
6
Electronic cigarette use among 14- to 17-year-olds in Europe.欧洲14至17岁青少年使用电子烟的情况。
Eur J Public Health. 2021 Apr 24;31(2):402-408. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa145.
7
[Not Available].[无可用内容]。
Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2019 Feb;36(1):6-20. doi: 10.1177/1455072518797823. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
8
Unique, long-term effects of nicotine on adolescent brain.尼古丁对青少年大脑的独特、长期影响。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2020 Oct;197:173010. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2020.173010. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
9
A future for the world's children? A WHO-UNICEF-Lancet Commission.世界儿童的未来?世界卫生组织-联合国儿童基金会-《柳叶刀》委员会。
Lancet. 2020 Feb 22;395(10224):605-658. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32540-1. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
10
Impact of snus use in teenage boys on tobacco use in young adulthood; a cohort from the HUNT Study Norway.青少年时期使用鼻烟对年轻成年人吸烟行为的影响;来自挪威 HUNT 研究的队列研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Sep 13;19(1):1265. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7584-5.