• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证一种新的与椎间孔镜手术训练箱相关的跟踪设备:TrEndo。

Validation of a new box trainer-related tracking device: the TrEndo.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, VU University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2012 Aug;26(8):2346-52. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2187-6. Epub 2012 Feb 21.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-012-2187-6
PMID:22350239
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3392508/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is an increasing demand for structured objective ex vivo training and assessment of laparoscopic psychomotor skills prior to implementation of these skills in practice. The aim of this study was to establish the internal validity of the TrEndo, a motion-tracking device, for implementation on a laparoscopic box trainer.

METHODS

Face validity and content validity were addressed through a structured questionnaire. To assess construct validity, participants were divided into an expert group and a novice group and performed two basic laparoscopic tasks. The TrEndo recorded five motion analysis parameters (MAPs) and time.

RESULTS

Participants demonstrated a high regard for face and content validity. All recorded MAPs differed significantly between experts and novices after performing a square knot. Overall, the TrEndo correctly assigned group membership in 84.7 and 95.7% of cases based on two laparoscopic tasks.

CONCLUSION

Face, content, and construct validities of the TrEndo were established. The TrEndo holds real potential as a (home) training device.

摘要

背景

在实践中实施这些技能之前,对腹腔镜心理运动技能进行结构化的客观离体培训和评估的需求不断增加。本研究的目的是确定 TrEndo(一种运动跟踪设备)在腹腔镜箱式训练器上应用的内部有效性。

方法

通过结构化问卷来解决表面有效性和内容有效性。为了评估结构有效性,参与者被分为专家组和新手组,并进行了两项基本的腹腔镜任务。TrEndo 记录了五个运动分析参数(MAPs)和时间。

结果

参与者对表面和内容有效性评价很高。在完成方结后,所有记录的 MAPs 在专家和新手之间均有显著差异。总体而言,基于两项腹腔镜任务,TrEndo 正确地将 84.7%和 95.7%的案例分配到了相应的组中。

结论

确立了 TrEndo 的表面、内容和结构有效性。TrEndo 作为(家庭)培训设备具有真正的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d63/3392508/cce3ae51c2f5/464_2012_2187_Fig1a_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d63/3392508/cce3ae51c2f5/464_2012_2187_Fig1a_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d63/3392508/cce3ae51c2f5/464_2012_2187_Fig1a_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of a new box trainer-related tracking device: the TrEndo.验证一种新的与椎间孔镜手术训练箱相关的跟踪设备:TrEndo。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Aug;26(8):2346-52. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2187-6. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
2
Laparoscopic skills training using inexpensive box trainers: which exercises to choose when constructing a validated training course.使用廉价的箱子训练器进行腹腔镜技能训练:在构建经过验证的培训课程时应选择哪些练习。
BJOG. 2011 Dec;118(13):1576-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03146.x. Epub 2011 Oct 10.
3
Learning curve on the TrEndo laparoscopic simulator compared to an expert level.与专家水平相比,TrEndo 腹腔镜模拟器上的学习曲线。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Aug;27(8):2934-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2859-x. Epub 2013 Feb 23.
4
EVA: laparoscopic instrument tracking based on Endoscopic Video Analysis for psychomotor skills assessment.EVA:基于内镜视频分析的腹腔镜器械跟踪用于心理运动技能评估。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Mar;27(3):1029-39. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2513-z. Epub 2012 Oct 6.
5
Intracorporeal suturing: economy of instrument movements using a box trainer model.体腔内缝合:使用盒式训练器模型节省器械运动的经济性。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011 Jul-Aug;18(4):494-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.04.003.
6
Validation Study of a Portable Home Trainer Using a Pad for Laparoscopic Practice.一种用于腹腔镜手术练习的带垫子便携式家用训练器的验证研究。
Surg Innov. 2017 Jun;24(3):284-288. doi: 10.1177/1553350617692481. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
7
Validation of a new basic virtual reality simulator for training of basic endoscopic skills: the SIMENDO.一种用于基础内镜技能培训的新型基础虚拟现实模拟器SIMENDO的验证
Surg Endosc. 2006 Mar;20(3):511-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0230-6. Epub 2006 Jan 25.
8
Validation of a Visual-Spatial Secondary Task to Assess Automaticity in Laparoscopic Skills.验证一种用于评估腹腔镜技能自动化的视觉-空间次要任务。
J Surg Educ. 2018 Jul-Aug;75(4):1001-1005. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.11.007. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
9
Development and validation of a laparoscopic hysterectomy cuff closure simulation model for surgical training.腹腔镜子宫切除术套管关闭模拟模型的开发和验证用于手术培训。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Mar;214(3):392.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.11.023. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
10
Supervised classification of psychomotor competence in minimally invasive surgery based on instruments motion analysis.基于器械运动分析的微创手术中心理运动能力的监督分类
Surg Endosc. 2014 Feb;28(2):657-70. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3226-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Objective performance indicators versus GEARS: an opportunity for more accurate assessment of surgical skill.客观绩效指标与 GEARS:更准确评估手术技能的机会。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2024 Nov;19(11):2259-2267. doi: 10.1007/s11548-024-03248-2. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
2
Development of a synchronous motion-tracking and video capture tool for flexible ureteroscopy.一种用于柔性输尿管镜检查的同步运动跟踪和视频捕获工具的开发。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2024 Apr;18(4):103-109. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.8530.
3
Distinguishing Intermediate and Novice Surgeons by Eye Movements.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: The state of the art.腹腔镜直肠癌手术:现状。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 Sep 27;2(9):275-82. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v2.i9.275.
2
Effectiveness of box trainers in laparoscopic training.箱式训练器在腹腔镜培训中的有效性。
J Minim Access Surg. 2007 Apr;3(2):57-63. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.33274.
3
Objective assessment of laparoscopic suturing skills using a motion-tracking system.使用运动跟踪系统对腹腔镜缝合技能进行客观评估。
通过眼动区分中级和新手外科医生。
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 10;11:542752. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.542752. eCollection 2020.
4
The value of force and torque measurements in transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME).经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME)中力和扭矩测量的价值。
Tech Coloproctol. 2019 Sep;23(9):843-852. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-02057-z. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
5
Force-based learning curve tracking in fundamental laparoscopic skills training.基于力的学习曲线跟踪在基础腹腔镜技能训练中的应用。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Aug;32(8):3609-3621. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6090-7. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
6
Analysis of motion in laparoscopy: the deconstruction of an intra-corporeal suturing task.腹腔镜检查中的运动分析:一项体内缝合任务的解构
Surg Endosc. 2017 Aug;31(8):3130-3139. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5337-4. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
7
Objective evaluation of surgical competency for minimally invasive surgery with a collection of simple tests.通过一系列简单测试对微创手术的手术能力进行客观评估。
Colomb Med (Cali). 2016 Mar 30;47(1):45-50.
8
Robotic surgery training: construct validity of Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS).机器人手术培训:机器人技能全球评估(GEARS)的结构效度
J Robot Surg. 2016 Sep;10(3):227-31. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0572-1. Epub 2016 Apr 2.
9
Surgical robotics beyond enhanced dexterity instrumentation: a survey of machine learning techniques and their role in intelligent and autonomous surgical actions.超越增强灵活性器械的手术机器人技术:机器学习技术及其在智能自主手术操作中的作用综述
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2016 Apr;11(4):553-68. doi: 10.1007/s11548-015-1305-z. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
10
Construct validity and educational role for motion analysis in a laparoscopic trainer.腹腔镜训练器中运动分析的结构效度和教育作用。
Surg Endosc. 2015 Sep;29(9):2491-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3988-6. Epub 2014 Dec 6.
Surg Endosc. 2011 Mar;25(3):771-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1251-3. Epub 2010 Nov 12.
4
Laparoscopic versus open sigmoid resection for diverticular disease: follow-up assessment of the randomized control Sigma trial.腹腔镜与开腹乙状结肠切除术治疗憩室病:随机对照 Sigma 试验的随访评估。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Apr;25(4):1121-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1327-0. Epub 2010 Sep 25.
5
A call for the utilization of consensus standards in the surgical education literature.呼吁在外科教育文献中使用共识标准。
Am J Surg. 2010 Jan;199(1):99-104. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.08.018.
6
Objective classification of residents based on their psychomotor laparoscopic skills.基于精神运动腹腔镜技能对住院医师进行客观分类。
Surg Endosc. 2010 May;24(5):1031-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0721-y. Epub 2009 Nov 14.
7
What is going on in augmented reality simulation in laparoscopic surgery?腹腔镜手术中的增强现实模拟是怎么回事?
Surg Endosc. 2009 Aug;23(8):1693-700. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0144-1. Epub 2008 Sep 24.
8
Face validity study of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic suturing simulator.ProMIS增强现实腹腔镜缝合模拟器的表面效度研究
Surg Technol Int. 2008;17:26-32.
9
Haptics in minimally invasive surgery--a review.微创手术中的触觉——综述
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2008;17(1):3-16. doi: 10.1080/13645700701820242.
10
Proving the effectiveness of virtual reality simulation for training in laparoscopic surgery.证明虚拟现实模拟在腹腔镜手术培训中的有效性。
Ann Surg. 2007 Nov;246(5):771-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3180f61b09.