Klokocovnik Tomislav, Kersnik Levart Tanja, Bunc Matjaz
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloska 7, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Croat Med J. 2012 Feb 15;53(1):11-6. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2012.53.11.
To compare the outcomes of patients who underwent upper mini-sternotomy or right mini-thoracotomy and those who underwent full sternotomy and to report a technical improvement in venous drainage by means of double venous cannulation of the superior vena cava (SVC) in mini surgical procedures.
We retrospectively analyzed the outcome of 217 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement through upper mini-sternotomy or right mini-thoracotomy at the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia from 1996 till 2010. Cannulation of SVC and right atrial appendage was performed in 142/217 (65%) patients, while in the remaining 75 (35%) patients, double cannulation of SVC was used for venous drainage. The results of patients who underwent mini approaches were compared to 236 patients who underwent full sternotomy for the same purpose from 2009 to 2010 at the same center.
We found a shorter mean length of intensive care unit stay, less volume chest-tube drainage, shorter crossclamp and cardio pulmonary bypass times, and less postoperative permanent pacemaker implantations in the minimally invasive group patients than in full sternotomy group patients. Using double cannulation of the SVC for venous drainage made venous cannulation in mini approaches easier and eliminated the need for obtaining femoral venous access.
Our study confirmed that even though technically challenging, upper mini-sternotomy and right mini-thoracotomy approaches for aortic valve replacement have potential advantages over conventional median sternotomy. They were proved to be safe, efficacious, and can significantly reduce surgical trauma and are therefore particularly valuable in some higher risk, obese, diabetic and elderly patients. Using double cannulation of SVC for venous drainage made venous cannulation easier and eliminated the need for obtaining femoral venous access.
比较接受上半部分胸骨切开术或右胸小切口手术的患者与接受全胸骨切开术患者的治疗结果,并报告在小型手术中通过上腔静脉(SVC)双静脉插管实现静脉引流的技术改进。
我们回顾性分析了1996年至2010年在斯洛文尼亚卢布尔雅那大学医学中心心血管外科通过上半部分胸骨切开术或右胸小切口进行主动脉瓣置换术的217例患者的治疗结果。142/217例(65%)患者进行了SVC和右心耳插管,而其余75例(35%)患者采用SVC双插管进行静脉引流。将接受小型手术入路的患者结果与2009年至2010年在同一中心因相同目的接受全胸骨切开术的236例患者进行比较。
我们发现,与全胸骨切开术组患者相比,微创组患者的重症监护病房平均住院时间更短、胸管引流量更少、主动脉阻断和体外循环时间更短,术后永久性起搏器植入率更低。使用SVC双插管进行静脉引流使小型手术入路的静脉插管更容易,并且无需获取股静脉通路。
我们的研究证实,尽管技术上具有挑战性,但用于主动脉瓣置换的上半部分胸骨切开术和右胸小切口手术入路相对于传统正中胸骨切开术具有潜在优势。它们被证明是安全、有效的,并且可以显著减少手术创伤,因此在一些高风险、肥胖、糖尿病和老年患者中特别有价值。使用SVC双插管进行静脉引流使静脉插管更容易,并且无需获取股静脉通路。