Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.
Ethn Dis. 2011 Summer;21(3 Suppl 1):S1-89-93.
The authors investigated perceptions of parents with children in the Head Start program about the processes of detection and intervention for developmental concerns.
Descriptive, qualitative study.
A large, urban Head Start agency, operating 14 centers and annually serving more than 1200 predominantly Latino children. During 2008-2009, a collaborative partnership with academicians from UCLA was created to evaluate their model of developmental screening and referrals. PARTICIPANTS AND PROCEDURES: We conducted 5 focus groups with a total of 30 parents of Head Start children with developmental concerns. Parents were asked about where they go for information when they have concerns, how they perceived the developmental screening process and services, and how children and families have changed after being in the Head Start program. Focus groups were recorded, transcribed and translated into English, then coded in ATLAS.ti using the domains above and sorted into themes for analysis.
Parents perceived the screening process as both diagnostically and therapeutically important, with multiple benefits ranging from closer parent-teacher relationships to improved parenting and understanding of developmental interventions. Families focused their discussion on the importance of social-emotional and behavioral development, with school readiness and improved expressive language as important but secondary outcomes.
For families of children with developmental and behavioral risks or concerns, a structured developmental screening process in a preschool setting, such as that provided by Head Start, may serve as a vital gateway for identifying and addressing concerns and promoting social-emotional learning, parent engagement, language development and school readiness.
作者调查了参加“学前教育计划”(Head Start program)的儿童家长对发育问题的检测和干预过程的看法。
描述性、定性研究。
一家大型城市“学前教育计划”机构,运营着 14 个中心,每年为 1200 多名以拉丁裔为主的儿童提供服务。在 2008 年至 2009 年期间,与加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校的学者建立了合作关系,以评估他们的发育筛查和转介模式。
我们对 30 名有发育问题的“学前教育计划”儿童的家长进行了 5 次焦点小组讨论。当家长有疑虑时,他们会询问去哪里获取信息;他们如何看待发育筛查过程和服务;以及孩子和家庭在参加“学前教育计划”后有何变化。焦点小组的讨论内容被记录、转录并翻译成英文,然后在 ATLAS.ti 中使用上述领域进行编码,并按照主题进行分类分析。
家长认为筛查过程具有诊断和治疗的重要性,有多种益处,包括密切的师生关系、提高育儿能力和对发育干预措施的理解。家庭讨论的重点是社会情感和行为发展的重要性,而学校准备和表达性语言的提高是重要但次要的结果。
对于有发育和行为风险或疑虑的儿童的家庭来说,在学前教育环境中,如“学前教育计划”提供的结构化发育筛查过程,可能是识别和解决问题以及促进社会情感学习、家长参与、语言发展和学校准备的重要途径。