Feldman Sue S, Hikmet Neset, Modi Shikha, Schooley Benjamin
University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1716 9th Avenue So. SHPB 590K, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA.
University of South Carolina, 550 Assembly Street, #1300, Columbia, SC 29208 USA.
Inf Syst Front. 2022;24(1):121-131. doi: 10.1007/s10796-020-10064-x. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
To date, most HIE studies have investigated user perceptions of value prior to use. Few studies have assessed factors associated with the value of HIE through its actual use. This study investigates provider perceptions on HIE comparing those who had prior experience vs those who had no experience with it. In so doing, we identify six constructs: prior use, system complexity, system concerns, public/population health, care delivery, and provider performance. This study uses a mixed methods approach to data collection. From 15 interviews of medical community leaders, a survey was constructed and administered to 263 clinicians. Descriptive statistics and analysis of variance was used, along with Tukey HSD tests for multiple comparisons. Results indicated providers whom previously used HIE had more positive perceptions about its benefits in terms of system complexity ( = .001), care delivery ( = .000), population health ( = .003), and provider performance ( = .005); women providers were more positive in terms of system concerns ( = .000); patient care ( = .031), and population health ( = .009); providers age 44-55 were more positive than older and younger groups in terms of patient care ( = .032), population health ( = .021), and provider performance ( = .014); while differences also existed across professional license groups (physician, nurse, other license, admin (no license)) for all five constructs ( < .05); and type of organization setting (hospital, ambulatory clinic, medical office, other) for three constructs including system concerns ( = .017), population health ( = .018), and provider performance (p = .018). There were no statistically significant differences found between groups based on a provider's role in an organization (patient care, administration, teaching/research, other). Different provider perspectives about the value derived from HIE use exist depending on prior experience with HIE, age, gender, license (physician, nurse, other license, admin (no license)), and type of organization setting (hospital, ambulatory clinic, medical office, other). This study draws from the theory of planned behavior to understand factors related to physicians' perceptions about HIE value, serving as a departure point for more detailed investigations of provider perceptions and behavior in regard to future HIE use and promoting interoperability.
迄今为止,大多数卫生信息交换(HIE)研究都在使用之前调查了用户对价值的认知。很少有研究通过卫生信息交换的实际使用来评估与其价值相关的因素。本研究调查了医疗服务提供者对卫生信息交换的看法,比较了有使用经验和没有使用经验的两组人员。通过这样做,我们确定了六个结构:先前使用情况、系统复杂性、系统问题、公共/人群健康、医疗服务提供以及医疗服务提供者绩效。本研究采用混合方法进行数据收集。从对15位医学界领袖的访谈中构建了一份调查问卷,并对263名临床医生进行了调查。使用了描述性统计和方差分析,以及用于多重比较的Tukey HSD检验。结果表明,先前使用过卫生信息交换的医疗服务提供者在系统复杂性(p = 0.001)、医疗服务提供(p = 0.000)、人群健康(p = 0.003)和医疗服务提供者绩效(p = 0.005)方面对其益处有更积极的看法;女性医疗服务提供者在系统问题(p = 0.000)、患者护理(p = 0.031)和人群健康(p = 0.009)方面更积极;44至55岁的医疗服务提供者在患者护理(p = 0.032)、人群健康(p = 0.021)和医疗服务提供者绩效(p = 0.014)方面比年龄较大和较小的组更积极;而在所有五个结构方面,不同专业执照组(医生、护士、其他执照、行政人员(无执照))之间也存在差异(p < 0.05);在系统问题(p = 0.017)、人群健康(p = 0.018)和医疗服务提供者绩效(p = 0.)这三个结构方面,不同组织类型(医院、门诊诊所、医疗办公室、其他)之间也存在差异。基于医疗服务提供者在组织中的角色(患者护理、行政管理、教学/研究、其他),两组之间未发现统计学上的显著差异。根据卫生信息交换的先前使用经验、年龄、性别、执照(医生、护士、其他执照、行政人员(无执照))以及组织类型(医院、门诊诊所、医疗办公室、其他),医疗服务提供者对卫生信息交换使用所产生价值的看法各不相同。本研究借鉴计划行为理论来理解与医生对卫生信息交换价值认知相关的因素,作为更详细调查医疗服务提供者对未来卫生信息交换使用的看法和行为以及促进互操作性的出发点。