Tyler Richard S
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Iowa, IA, USA.
J Am Acad Audiol. 2012 Feb;23(2):115-25. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.23.2.6.
There will likely be several different tinnitus treatments necessary, and it is important to understand patient preferences and factors that might contribute to treatment acceptability. This study explores the acceptability of a wide range of different tinnitus treatments, from noninvasive wearable devices to surgically implanted devices in the brain. Understanding how tinnitus sufferers consider and rank such options and how they might be influenced by their own perception of the severity of their tinnitus could help clinicians, researchers, and companies plan future efforts for approaching new treatments.
197 tinnitus self-help group attendees rated their acceptance of treatments on a scale from 0 (not acceptable) to 100 (fully acceptable). The treatments included external devices, medications, cochlear implants, an implant on the brain surface, and an implant in the brain. They were also asked how much they would pay for successful treatments.
There was a significant correlation between loudness and annoyance (r = .78). To reduce tinnitus by half, an "acceptable" response between 91 and 100 was reported by 30% of the respondents for devices, by 52% for pills, by 25% for cochlear implants, by 13% for implants on the brain surface, and by 13% for implants in the brain. To reduce tinnitus completely, a 91-100 acceptable response was reported by 42% for devices, by 62% for pills, by 38% for cochlear implants, by 21% for implants on the brain surface, and by 19% for implants in the brain. To reduce tinnitus completely, participants most commonly selected to pay at least $5000, and 20.3% were willing to pay as much as $25,000. The ratings of tinnitus loudness and annoyance were positively correlated with the likelihood of using any treatment. Surprisingly, there was a weak relationship between annoyance and the amount they were willing to pay.
Tinnitus patients are prepared to accept a wide variety of treatments. Medications are the most acceptable. Invasive procedures can also be acceptable to many, particularly if they provide complete relief.
可能需要多种不同的耳鸣治疗方法,了解患者的偏好以及可能影响治疗可接受性的因素非常重要。本研究探讨了从无创可穿戴设备到脑部手术植入设备等多种不同耳鸣治疗方法的可接受性。了解耳鸣患者如何考虑并对这些选择进行排序,以及他们如何受到自身对耳鸣严重程度的认知影响,有助于临床医生、研究人员和公司规划未来开发新治疗方法的工作。
197名耳鸣自助小组参与者对治疗方法的接受程度进行评分,范围从0(不可接受)到100(完全可接受)。治疗方法包括外部设备、药物、人工耳蜗、脑表面植入物和脑内植入物。他们还被问及为成功治疗愿意支付多少钱。
响度与烦恼程度之间存在显著相关性(r = 0.78)。为了将耳鸣减轻一半,30%的受访者对设备给出了91至100的“可接受”回答,对药物为52%,对人工耳蜗为25%,对脑表面植入物为13%,对脑内植入物为13%。为了完全消除耳鸣,对设备给出91至100可接受回答的为42%,对药物为62%,对人工耳蜗为38%,对脑表面植入物为21%,对脑内植入物为19%。为了完全消除耳鸣,参与者最常选择支付至少5000美元,20.3%的人愿意支付高达25000美元。耳鸣响度和烦恼程度的评分与使用任何治疗方法的可能性呈正相关。令人惊讶的是,烦恼程度与他们愿意支付的金额之间关系较弱。
耳鸣患者愿意接受多种治疗方法。药物是最可接受的。侵入性手术对许多人来说也可以接受,特别是如果它们能提供完全缓解。