• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

来氟米特或他克莫司单药治疗类风湿关节炎的疗效和耐受性比较:一项基于随机对照试验的贝叶斯网状 Meta 分析。

Comparative efficacy and tolerability of monotherapy with leflunomide or tacrolimus for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Division of Rheumatology, Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Seoul, South Korea.

Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, 73, Inchon-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 136-705, South Korea.

出版信息

Clin Rheumatol. 2018 Feb;37(2):323-330. doi: 10.1007/s10067-017-3857-5. Epub 2017 Oct 1.

DOI:10.1007/s10067-017-3857-5
PMID:28967035
Abstract

We aimed to assess the relative efficacy and tolerability of monotherapy with leflunomide or tacrolimus at recommended dosages in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the efficacy and tolerability of leflunomide 20 mg, leflunomide 10 mg, tacrolimus 3 mg, tacrolimus 1.5-2 mg, and placebo, based on the number of withdrawals of RA patients, were included. We performed a Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis to combine direct and indirect evidence from the RCTs. Six RCTs including 1510 patients met the inclusion criteria. The proportion of patient withdrawals owing to lack of efficacy was significantly lower in the leflunomide 20 mg (OR 0.17, 95% credible interval (CrI) 0.08-0.34); leflunomide 10 mg (OR 0.16, 95% CrI 0.02-0.75); and tacrolimus 3 mg (OR 0.41, 95% CrI 0.21-0.74) groups than in the placebo group. Rank probability based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values indicated that leflunomide 20 mg had the highest probability of being the best treatment based on the number of withdrawals owing to lack of efficacy (SUCRA = 0.8530), followed by leflunomide 10 mg (SUCRA = 0.8321), tacrolimus 3 mg (SUCRA = 0.4965), tacrolimus 1.5-2 mg (SUCRA = 0.3035), and placebo (SUCRA = 0.0150). Patient withdrawals owing to adverse events did not differ significantly among the groups; however, withdrawals in the placebo group were fewer than those in the leflunomide 20 mg group (OR 0.22, 95% CrI 0.07-0.74). Placebo had the highest probability of being the most tolerable treatment (SUCRA = 0.8161) followed by tacrolimus 3 mg (SUCRA = 0.6490), tacrolimus 1.5-2 mg (SUCRA = 0.4857), leflunomide 10 mg (SUCRA = 0.4651), and leflunomide 20 mg (SUCRA = 0.0841). Leflunomide 20 mg, leflunomide 10 mg, and tacrolimus 3 mg were more efficacious than placebo, while leflunomide 20 mg was less tolerable than placebo. Leflunomide is likely to be more efficacious but less tolerable than tacrolimus for RA treatment.

摘要

我们旨在评估在类风湿关节炎 (RA) 患者中推荐剂量下使用来氟米特或他克莫司单药治疗的相对疗效和耐受性。我们纳入了基于 RA 患者退出人数评估来氟米特 20mg、来氟米特 10mg、他克莫司 3mg、他克莫司 1.5-2mg 和安慰剂疗效和耐受性的随机对照试验 (RCT)。我们采用贝叶斯随机效应网络荟萃分析来合并 RCT 的直接和间接证据。纳入的 6 项 RCT 共纳入了 1510 例患者。与安慰剂组相比,来氟米特 20mg(OR 0.17,95%可信区间 [CrI] 0.08-0.34);来氟米特 10mg(OR 0.16,95% CrI 0.02-0.75);和他克莫司 3mg(OR 0.41,95% CrI 0.21-0.74)组患者因疗效不佳而退出的比例显著降低。基于累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)值的排名概率表明,来氟米特 20mg 因疗效不佳而退出的可能性最高(SUCRA=0.8530),其次是来氟米特 10mg(SUCRA=0.8321)、他克莫司 3mg(SUCRA=0.4965)、他克莫司 1.5-2mg(SUCRA=0.3035)和安慰剂(SUCRA=0.0150)。各组间因不良事件而退出的患者无显著差异;然而,安慰剂组的退出人数少于来氟米特 20mg 组(OR 0.22,95% CrI 0.07-0.74)。安慰剂具有成为最耐受治疗的最高可能性(SUCRA=0.8161),其次是他克莫司 3mg(SUCRA=0.6490)、他克莫司 1.5-2mg(SUCRA=0.4857)、来氟米特 10mg(SUCRA=0.4651)和来氟米特 20mg(SUCRA=0.0841)。来氟米特 20mg、来氟米特 10mg 和他克莫司 3mg 比安慰剂更有效,而来氟米特 20mg 比安慰剂更不耐受。来氟米特治疗 RA 的疗效可能优于他克莫司,但耐受性较差。

相似文献

1
Comparative efficacy and tolerability of monotherapy with leflunomide or tacrolimus for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.来氟米特或他克莫司单药治疗类风湿关节炎的疗效和耐受性比较:一项基于随机对照试验的贝叶斯网状 Meta 分析。
Clin Rheumatol. 2018 Feb;37(2):323-330. doi: 10.1007/s10067-017-3857-5. Epub 2017 Oct 1.
2
Comparative efficacy and safety of tofacitinib, with or without methotrexate, in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.托法替布(无论是否联用甲氨蝶呤)用于活动性类风湿关节炎患者的疗效和安全性比较:一项关于随机对照试验的贝叶斯网络荟萃分析
Rheumatol Int. 2015 Dec;35(12):1965-74. doi: 10.1007/s00296-015-3291-4. Epub 2015 May 21.
3
Comparative efficacy and tolerability of sarilumab 150 and 200 mg in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis : A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.150毫克和200毫克的萨立尤单抗治疗活动性类风湿关节炎患者的疗效和耐受性比较:一项随机对照试验的贝叶斯网络荟萃分析
Z Rheumatol. 2018 Jun;77(5):421-428. doi: 10.1007/s00393-017-0292-6.
4
Comparative efficacy and safety of tocilizumab, rituximab, abatacept and tofacitinib in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis that inadequately responds to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.托珠单抗、利妥昔单抗、阿巴西普和托法替布在对肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂反应不足的活动性类风湿关节炎患者中的疗效和安全性比较:一项随机对照试验的贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2016 Nov;19(11):1103-1111. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.12822. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
5
Relative efficacy and tolerability of etoricoxib, celecoxib, and naproxen in the treatment of osteoarthritis : A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials based on patient withdrawal.依托考昔、塞来昔布和萘普生治疗骨关节炎的相对疗效和耐受性:基于患者退出情况的随机对照试验的贝叶斯网络荟萃分析
Z Rheumatol. 2016 Jun;75(5):508-16. doi: 10.1007/s00393-015-0023-9.
6
Comparative efficacy and safety of 100 mg and 200 mg filgotinib administered to patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
.100毫克和200毫克非戈替尼治疗活动性类风湿关节炎患者的疗效和安全性比较:一项随机对照试验的贝叶斯网络荟萃分析
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Jun;58(6):293-298. doi: 10.5414/CP203635.
7
Efficacy and safety of methotrexate plus certolizumab pegol or placebo in active rheumatoid arthritis : Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.甲氨蝶呤联合赛妥珠单抗聚乙二醇或安慰剂治疗活动性类风湿关节炎的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Z Rheumatol. 2017 Aug;76(6):528-534. doi: 10.1007/s00393-016-0133-z.
8
Comparative efficacy and safety of baricitinib 2 mg and 4 mg in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis : A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.巴瑞替尼2毫克和4毫克治疗活动性类风湿关节炎患者的疗效和安全性比较:一项随机对照试验的贝叶斯网络荟萃分析
Z Rheumatol. 2018 May;77(4):335-342. doi: 10.1007/s00393-016-0254-4.
9
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Peficitinib 25, 50, 100, and 150 mg in Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.比较培非替尼 25、50、100 和 150mg 在活动性类风湿关节炎患者中的疗效和安全性:一项基于随机对照试验的贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
Clin Drug Investig. 2020 Jan;40(1):65-72. doi: 10.1007/s40261-019-00863-9.
10
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib and upadacitinib in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.比较托法替布和乌帕替尼在活动性类风湿关节炎患者中的疗效和安全性:一项基于随机对照试验的贝叶斯网状荟萃分析。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2019 Aug;22(8):1563-1571. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.13616. Epub 2019 Jun 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Chinese guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: 2024 update.《中国类风湿关节炎诊疗指南(2024年版)》
Rheumatol Immunol Res. 2025 Jan 9;5(4):189-208. doi: 10.1515/rir-2024-0028. eCollection 2024 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Rheumatoid arthritis.类风湿关节炎
Lancet. 2016 Oct 22;388(10055):2023-2038. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30173-8. Epub 2016 May 3.
2
Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: concepts and models for multi-arm studies.网状meta 分析中的一致性与不一致性:多臂研究的概念和模型。
Res Synth Methods. 2012 Jun;3(2):98-110. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1044.
3
Automating network meta-analysis.自动化网络荟萃分析。
Res Synth Methods. 2012 Dec;3(4):285-99. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1054. Epub 2012 Aug 23.
4
A Microsoft-Excel-based tool for running and critically appraising network meta-analyses--an overview and application of NetMetaXL.一种基于Microsoft Excel的用于开展和严格评价网状Meta分析的工具——NetMetaXL概述及应用
Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 29;3:110. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-110.
5
Evidence synthesis for decision making 4: inconsistency in networks of evidence based on randomized controlled trials.证据综合决策 4:基于随机对照试验的证据网络中的不一致性。
Med Decis Making. 2013 Jul;33(5):641-56. doi: 10.1177/0272989X12455847.
6
Leflunomide in monotherapy of rheumatoid arthritis: meta-analysis of randomized trials.来氟米特单药治疗类风湿关节炎:随机试验的荟萃分析
Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2012;122(1-2):22-32. doi: 10.20452/pamw.1131. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
7
Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial.呈现多处理荟萃分析结果的图形方法和数值总结:概述和教程。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Feb;64(2):163-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.016. Epub 2010 Aug 5.
8
Tacrolimus for the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.他克莫司治疗活动期类风湿关节炎的系统评价和荟萃分析:随机对照试验。
Scand J Rheumatol. 2010 Aug;39(4):271-8. doi: 10.3109/03009740903501642.
9
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目:PRISMA声明。
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 18;151(4):264-9, W64. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135. Epub 2009 Jul 20.
10
A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and toxicity of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and biological agents for psoriatic arthritis.对改善病情抗风湿药物和生物制剂治疗银屑病关节炎的疗效及毒性的系统评价和荟萃分析
Ann Rheum Dis. 2008 Jun;67(6):855-9. doi: 10.1136/ard.2007.072652. Epub 2007 Sep 7.