Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, 11405 87 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1C9, Canada.
Sci Transl Med. 2012 Feb 22;4(122):122cm3. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003490.
Multisectoral collaborative models for drug and therapeutic research and development (R&D) are emerging, requiring a recalibration of how intellectual property rights (IPRs) are used. Although these models appear promising, little study has been conducted on the optimal blend of sharing and exclusion as mediated through the proactive use or nonuse of IPRs. This Commentary is a call for a combination of theoretical and empirical analyses to build a comprehensive understanding of the interplay between formal IP laws, institutions that administer and manage IPRs, and the use of IPRs in practice to better construct and manage collaborations. Such analyses require outcome metrics formulated to measure the success of therapeutic outcomes and to capture the complexity of a highly networked R&D environment.
多部门协作模式在药物和治疗研发(R&D)中逐渐兴起,这要求对知识产权(IPR)的使用方式进行重新调整。尽管这些模式似乎很有前景,但对于通过积极使用或不使用 IPR 来进行共享和排除的最佳组合,研究甚少。本评论呼吁进行理论和实证分析的结合,以建立对正式 IP 法律、管理和管理 IPR 的机构以及 IPR 在实践中的使用之间相互作用的全面理解,从而更好地构建和管理合作。此类分析需要制定结果指标,以衡量治疗结果的成功,并捕捉高度网络化的 R&D 环境的复杂性。