• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

表面上肽聚集的动力学途径:β-折叠倾向和表面吸引力的影响。

Kinetic pathways to peptide aggregation on surfaces: the effects of β-sheet propensity and surface attraction.

机构信息

Department of Physics, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA.

出版信息

J Chem Phys. 2012 Feb 14;136(6):065103. doi: 10.1063/1.3682986.

DOI:10.1063/1.3682986
PMID:22360223
Abstract

Mechanisms of peptide aggregation on hydrophobic surfaces are explored using molecular dynamics simulations with a coarse-grained peptide representation. Systems of peptides are studied with varying degrees of backbone rigidity (a measure of β-sheet propensity) and degrees of attraction between their hydrophobic residues and the surface. Multiple pathways for aggregation are observed, depending on the surface attraction and peptide β-sheet propensity. For the case of a single-layered β-sheet fibril forming on the surface (a dominant structure seen in all simulations), three mechanisms are observed: (a) a condensation-ordering transition where a bulk-formed amorphous aggregate binds to the surface and subsequently rearranges to form a fibril; (b) the initial formation of a single-layered fibril in the bulk depositing flat on the surface; and (c) peptides binding individually to the surface and nucleating fibril formation by individual peptide deposition. Peptides with a stiffer chiral backbone prefer mechanism (b) over (a), and stronger surface attractions prefer mechanism (c) over (a) and (b). Our model is compared to various similar experimental systems, and an agreement was found in terms of the surface increasing the degree of fibrillar aggregation, with the directions of fibrillar growth matching the crystallographic symmetry of the surface. Our simulations provide details of aggregate growth mechanisms on scales inaccessible to either experiment or atomistic simulations.

摘要

使用粗粒肽表示的分子动力学模拟探索疏水性表面上肽聚集的机制。研究了具有不同程度的骨架刚性(β-折叠倾向的度量)和疏水性残基与表面之间吸引力的肽系统。根据表面吸引力和肽β-折叠倾向,观察到了多种聚集途径。对于在表面上形成单层β-折叠原纤维的情况(所有模拟中都可见到的主要结构),观察到了三种机制:(a)凝聚-有序转变,其中体相形成的无定形聚集体结合到表面上,随后重新排列形成原纤维;(b)在体相中原纤维的单层初始形成并沉积在表面上;和(c)肽单独结合到表面上,并通过单个肽沉积引发原纤维形成。具有刚性手性骨架的肽更倾向于机制(b)而不是(a),并且更强的表面吸引力更倾向于机制(c)而不是(a)和(b)。我们的模型与各种类似的实验系统进行了比较,并且在表面增加原纤维聚集程度方面以及原纤维生长方向与表面的晶体学对称性匹配方面达成了一致。我们的模拟提供了在实验或原子模拟都无法达到的尺度上的聚集体生长机制的详细信息。

相似文献

1
Kinetic pathways to peptide aggregation on surfaces: the effects of β-sheet propensity and surface attraction.表面上肽聚集的动力学途径:β-折叠倾向和表面吸引力的影响。
J Chem Phys. 2012 Feb 14;136(6):065103. doi: 10.1063/1.3682986.
2
β-sheet propensity controls the kinetic pathways and morphologies of seeded peptide aggregation.β-折叠倾向控制着被种子肽聚集的动力学途径和形态。
J Chem Phys. 2012 Oct 14;137(14):145104. doi: 10.1063/1.4755748.
3
Effect of beta-sheet propensity on peptide aggregation.β-折叠倾向对肽聚集的影响。
J Chem Phys. 2009 Apr 14;130(14):145103. doi: 10.1063/1.3108461.
4
Diversity of kinetic pathways in amyloid fibril formation.淀粉样纤维形成中动力学途径的多样性。
J Chem Phys. 2009 Sep 21;131(11):111102. doi: 10.1063/1.3216103.
5
Effects of surface interactions on peptide aggregate morphology.表面相互作用对肽聚集形态的影响。
J Chem Phys. 2011 Aug 28;135(8):085102. doi: 10.1063/1.3624929.
6
Probing amyloid fibril formation of the NFGAIL peptide by computer simulations.通过计算机模拟探究NFGAIL肽的淀粉样纤维形成过程。
J Chem Phys. 2007 Feb 14;126(6):065101. doi: 10.1063/1.2435358.
7
Surfactant effects on amyloid aggregation kinetics.表面活性剂对淀粉样蛋白聚集动力学的影响。
J Mol Biol. 2011 Nov 25;414(2):303-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.10.011. Epub 2011 Oct 14.
8
Monte Carlo simulations of protein amyloid formation reveal origin of sigmoidal aggregation kinetics.蛋白质淀粉样形成的蒙特卡洛模拟揭示了S型聚集动力学的起源。
Mol Biosyst. 2011 Jul;7(7):2296-303. doi: 10.1039/c0mb00321b. Epub 2011 May 17.
9
Molecular mechanism of β-sheet self-organization at water-hydrophobic interfaces.β-折叠在水-疏水环境中的自组织分子机制。
Proteins. 2011 Jan;79(1):1-22. doi: 10.1002/prot.22854. Epub 2010 Oct 11.
10
Self-assembly of beta-sheet forming peptides into chiral fibrillar aggregates.β-折叠形成肽自组装成手性纤维状聚集体。
J Chem Phys. 2007 Jun 28;126(24):245104. doi: 10.1063/1.2739547.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring Abeta42 monomer diffusion dynamics on fibril surfaces through molecular simulations.通过分子模拟探索β淀粉样蛋白42单体在原纤维表面的扩散动力学。
Protein Sci. 2025 Jun;34(6):e70131. doi: 10.1002/pro.70131.
2
Molecular Determinants of Protein Pathogenicity at the Single-Aggregate Level.单聚集体水平上蛋白质致病性的分子决定因素
Adv Sci (Weinh). 2025 Mar;12(9):e2410229. doi: 10.1002/advs.202410229. Epub 2025 Jan 13.
3
Macromolecular crowding in solution alters huntingtin interaction and aggregation at interfaces.溶液中的大分子拥挤改变了 Huntingtin 在界面处的相互作用和聚集。
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2021 Oct;206:111969. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.111969. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
4
Effect of Surface Roughness on Aggregation of Polypeptide Chains: A Monte Carlo Study.表面粗糙度对多肽链聚集的影响:蒙特卡罗研究。
Biomolecules. 2021 Apr 18;11(4):596. doi: 10.3390/biom11040596.
5
Physical mechanisms of amyloid nucleation on fluid membranes.在流动膜上淀粉样蛋白成核的物理机制。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Dec 29;117(52):33090-33098. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2007694117. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
6
β-Amyloid aggregation and heterogeneous nucleation.β-淀粉样蛋白聚集和异质成核。
Protein Sci. 2019 Sep;28(9):1567-1581. doi: 10.1002/pro.3674. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
7
Factors affecting the physical stability (aggregation) of peptide therapeutics.影响肽类治疗药物物理稳定性(聚集)的因素。
Interface Focus. 2017 Dec 6;7(6):20170030. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2017.0030. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
8
Statistical mechanical treatments of protein amyloid formation.蛋白质淀粉样纤维形成的统计力学处理。
Int J Mol Sci. 2013 Aug 23;14(9):17420-52. doi: 10.3390/ijms140917420.
9
Biophysical insights into how surfaces, including lipid membranes, modulate protein aggregation related to neurodegeneration.生物物理视角下的表面(包括脂质膜)如何调节与神经退行性变相关的蛋白质聚集。
Front Neurol. 2013 Mar 1;4:17. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2013.00017. eCollection 2013.