Department of Surgery, New York Methodist Hospital, New York, NY 11215, USA.
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Jun;55(6):1690-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.12.056. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
Postoperative pulmonary embolism (PE) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality after bariatric surgery. However, the concurrent prophylactic placement of an inferior vena cava filter (CPIVCF) in patients undergoing bariatric operations remains controversial. This study used the Bariatric Outcomes Longitudinal Database (BOLD) to establish associated characters and determine outcomes of CPIVCF for patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (GB) and adjustable gastric banding (AB) surgeries.
We analyzed BOLD, a database of bariatric surgery patient information. GB and AB operations were categorized into open and laparoscopic approaches. Univariate logistic regressions were used to compare between non-CPIVCF and concurrent CPIVCF groups. Significant variables (P < .05) were subsequently input into multivariate regression models: CPIVCF was retained in each model.
A total of 322 CPIVCFs (0.33%) were identified from 97,218 GB and AB operations performed between 2007 and 2010 in this retrospective registry study. Significant differences were identified in male gender (21.1% vs 31.4%; P < .001), preoperative body mass index (BMI; 44.5 ± 6.6 vs 45.3 ± 7; P < .001), and African-American race (10.5% vs 18%; P < .001) between non-CPIVCF and CPIVCF groups. The CPIVCF group had more patients with previous nonbariatric surgery (50% vs 43.6%; P = .02), a history of venous thromboembolism (VTE; 21.4% vs 3.1%; P < .001), impairment of functional status (7.8% vs 3.1%; P < .001), lower extremity edema (47.2% vs 27.1%; P < .001), obesity hypoventilation syndrome (7.1% vs 2.1%; P < .001), obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (58.1% vs 43.3%; P < .001), and pulmonary hypertension (13% vs 4.1%; P < .001). Patients in the CPIVCF group were more likely to receive GB than gastric banding (77% vs 58.1%; P < .001) and an open surgical approach (21.4% vs 4.8%; P < .001). Operative duration was longer in the CPIVCF group (119 ± 67 vs 89 ± 52 minutes; P < .001). The CPIVCF group also had a longer length of hospital stay (3 ± 2 vs 2 ± 6 days; P = .048), was associated with higher incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT; 0.93% vs 0.12%; P < .001), and had a higher mortality (0.31% vs 0.03%; P = .003) from PE and indeterminate causes. In multivariate analysis, male gender, African-American race, previous nonbariatric surgery, a high BMI, obesity hypoventilation syndrome, history of VTE, lower extremity edema, and pulmonary hypertension were preoperative factors associated with CPIVCF.
CPIVCF was associated with specific clinical features, increased health care resource utilization, and a higher mortality in patients undergoing bariatric operations. Although selected patient characteristics influence surgeons to perform CPIVCF, this study was unable to establish an outcome benefit for CPIVCF.
术后肺栓塞(PE)是减重手术后发病率和死亡率的主要原因。然而,在接受减重手术的患者中同时预防性放置下腔静脉滤器(CPIVCF)仍然存在争议。本研究使用减重手术结果纵向数据库(BOLD)建立相关特征,并确定罗伊恩-耶 gastric bypass(GB)和可调胃带(AB)手术中 CPIVCF 的结果。
我们分析了 BOLD,这是一个关于减重手术患者信息的数据库。GB 和 AB 手术分为开放和腹腔镜方法。使用单变量逻辑回归比较非 CPIVCF 组和同期 CPIVCF 组。随后将有显著意义的变量(P <.05)输入多元回归模型:CPIVCF 保留在每个模型中。
在这项回顾性登记研究中,从 2007 年至 2010 年期间进行的 97218 例 GB 和 AB 手术中,共确定了 322 例 CPIVCF(0.33%)。非 CPIVCF 组和 CPIVCF 组在男性(21.1%比 31.4%;P <.001)、术前体重指数(BMI;44.5 ± 6.6 比 45.3 ± 7;P <.001)和非裔美国人种族(10.5%比 18%;P <.001)方面存在显著差异。CPIVCF 组有更多的患者有过非减重手术史(50%比 43.6%;P =.02)、静脉血栓栓塞史(21.4%比 3.1%;P <.001)、功能状态受损(7.8%比 3.1%;P <.001)、下肢水肿(47.2%比 27.1%;P <.001)、肥胖通气不足综合征(7.1%比 2.1%;P <.001)、阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征(58.1%比 43.3%;P <.001)和肺动脉高压(13%比 4.1%;P <.001)。CPIVCF 组更倾向于接受 GB 手术,而不是胃带(77%比 58.1%;P <.001)和开放手术(21.4%比 4.8%;P <.001)。CPIVCF 组的手术时间更长(119 ± 67 比 89 ± 52 分钟;P <.001)。CPIVCF 组的住院时间也更长(3 ± 2 比 2 ± 6 天;P =.048),深静脉血栓形成(DVT;0.93%比 0.12%;P <.001)发生率更高,PE 和不确定原因的死亡率更高(0.31%比 0.03%;P =.003)。多元分析显示,男性、非裔美国人种族、非减重手术史、高 BMI、肥胖通气不足综合征、静脉血栓栓塞史、下肢水肿和肺动脉高压是 CPIVCF 的术前相关因素。
CPIVCF 与患者接受减重手术后的特定临床特征、增加的医疗保健资源利用和更高的死亡率相关。尽管某些患者特征会影响外科医生进行 CPIVCF,但本研究未能确定 CPIVCF 的结果获益。