• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

语速和练习对多物体命名中视觉注意力分配的影响。

Effects of speech rate and practice on the allocation of visual attention in multiple object naming.

作者信息

Meyer Antje S, Wheeldon Linda, van der Meulen Femke, Konopka Agnieszka

机构信息

Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics and Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University Nijmegen, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2012 Feb 20;3:39. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00039. eCollection 2012.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00039
PMID:22363310
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3282304/
Abstract

Earlier studies had shown that speakers naming several objects typically look at each object until they have retrieved the phonological form of its name and therefore look longer at objects with long names than at objects with shorter names. We examined whether this tight eye-to-speech coordination was maintained at different speech rates and after increasing amounts of practice. Participants named the same set of objects with monosyllabic or disyllabic names on up to 20 successive trials. In Experiment 1, they spoke as fast as they could, whereas in Experiment 2 they had to maintain a fixed moderate or faster speech rate. In both experiments, the durations of the gazes to the objects decreased with increasing speech rate, indicating that at higher speech rates, the speakers spent less time planning the object names. The eye-speech lag (the time interval between the shift of gaze away from an object and the onset of its name) was independent of the speech rate but became shorter with increasing practice. Consistent word length effects on the durations of the gazes to the objects and the eye-speech lags were only found in Experiment 2. The results indicate that shifts of eye gaze are often linked to the completion of phonological encoding, but that speakers can deviate from this default coordination of eye gaze and speech, for instance when the descriptive task is easy and they aim to speak fast.

摘要

早期研究表明,说话者在说出多个物体的名称时,通常会看着每个物体,直到检索到其名称的语音形式,因此,与名称较短的物体相比,他们看名称较长的物体的时间更长。我们研究了在不同语速下以及随着练习量的增加,这种紧密的眼-语协调是否会保持。参与者连续进行多达20次试验,用单音节或双音节名称说出同一组物体。在实验1中,他们尽可能快地说话,而在实验2中,他们必须保持固定的中等语速或更快的语速。在两个实验中,对物体注视的持续时间都随着语速的增加而减少,这表明在较高语速下,说话者在计划物体名称上花费的时间更少。眼-语延迟(即注视从物体移开到其名称开始之间的时间间隔)与语速无关,但随着练习的增加而变短。仅在实验2中发现了一致的词长效应,即对物体注视的持续时间和眼-语延迟。结果表明,目光转移通常与语音编码的完成有关,但说话者可以偏离这种默认的眼-语协调,例如当描述任务容易且他们旨在快速说话时。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a52b/3282304/f6cc875ae9f6/fpsyg-03-00039-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a52b/3282304/692677ccdd7f/fpsyg-03-00039-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a52b/3282304/b0477760d5f4/fpsyg-03-00039-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a52b/3282304/474453d7278c/fpsyg-03-00039-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a52b/3282304/833f5b86977d/fpsyg-03-00039-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a52b/3282304/a032018b2ea3/fpsyg-03-00039-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a52b/3282304/d4aff8c84997/fpsyg-03-00039-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a52b/3282304/de8955b97a01/fpsyg-03-00039-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a52b/3282304/7959e924b591/fpsyg-03-00039-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a52b/3282304/f6cc875ae9f6/fpsyg-03-00039-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a52b/3282304/692677ccdd7f/fpsyg-03-00039-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a52b/3282304/b0477760d5f4/fpsyg-03-00039-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a52b/3282304/474453d7278c/fpsyg-03-00039-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a52b/3282304/833f5b86977d/fpsyg-03-00039-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a52b/3282304/a032018b2ea3/fpsyg-03-00039-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a52b/3282304/d4aff8c84997/fpsyg-03-00039-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a52b/3282304/de8955b97a01/fpsyg-03-00039-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a52b/3282304/7959e924b591/fpsyg-03-00039-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a52b/3282304/f6cc875ae9f6/fpsyg-03-00039-g009.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of speech rate and practice on the allocation of visual attention in multiple object naming.语速和练习对多物体命名中视觉注意力分配的影响。
Front Psychol. 2012 Feb 20;3:39. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00039. eCollection 2012.
2
Viewing and naming objects: eye movements during noun phrase production.观察与命名物体:名词短语生成过程中的眼动情况
Cognition. 1998 May;66(2):B25-33. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00009-2.
3
Speech planning during multiple-object naming: effects of ageing.多物体命名过程中的言语规划:衰老的影响
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Aug;61(8):1217-38. doi: 10.1080/17470210701467912.
4
Gaze durations during speech reflect word selection and phonological encoding.言语过程中的注视持续时间反映了词汇选择和语音编码。
Cognition. 2001 Nov;82(1):B1-14. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(01)00138-x.
5
Planning and coordination of utterances in a joint naming task.联合命名任务中话语的规划与协调。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Apr;45(4):732-752. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000603. Epub 2018 Jul 12.
6
Lateralized electrical brain activity reveals covert attention allocation during speaking.大脑电活动的偏侧化揭示了说话过程中隐蔽的注意力分配。
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Jan 27;95:101-110. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.12.013. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
7
Does word length affect speech onset latencies when producing single words?在说单个单词时,单词长度是否会影响言语起始潜伏期?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Jul;36(4):892-905. doi: 10.1037/a0019446.
8
The time course of name retrieval during multiple-object naming: evidence from extrafoveal-on-foveal effects.多目标命名过程中的命名检索时间进程:来自中心凹外-中心凹效应的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Mar;36(2):523-37. doi: 10.1037/a0018522.
9
Phonological priming effects on speech onset latencies and viewing times in object naming.语音启动对物体命名中言语起始潜伏期和注视时间的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2000 Jun;7(2):314-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03212987.
10
Extrafoveal processing of objects in a naming task: evidence from word probe experiments.命名任务中物体的中央凹外加工:来自单词探测实验的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Jun;15(3):561-5. doi: 10.3758/pbr.15.3.561.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating the flow of information during speaking: the impact of morpho-phonological, associative, and categorical picture distractors on picture naming.研究说话过程中的信息流动:词法语音、联想和分类图片干扰项对图片命名的影响。
Front Psychol. 2015 Oct 12;6:1540. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01540. eCollection 2015.
2
Interfaces between language and cognition.语言与认知之间的接口。
Front Psychol. 2013 May 6;4:258. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00258. eCollection 2013.

本文引用的文献

1
Does word length affect speech onset latencies when producing single words?在说单个单词时,单词长度是否会影响言语起始潜伏期?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Jul;36(4):892-905. doi: 10.1037/a0019446.
2
Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models.分类数据分析:远离方差分析(无论是否进行变换),转向逻辑混合模型。
J Mem Lang. 2008 Nov;59(4):434-446. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007.
3
Name-picture verification as a control measure for object naming: a task analysis and norms for a large set of pictures.
姓名-图片验证作为物体命名的一种控制措施:一项针对大量图片的任务分析及规范
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Aug;62(8):1581-97. doi: 10.1080/17470210802511139. Epub 2008 Dec 27.
4
Attention, gaze shifting, and dual-task interference from phonological encoding in spoken word planning.口语单词计划中的注意力、注视转移以及来自语音编码的双重任务干扰。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Dec;34(6):1580-98. doi: 10.1037/a0012476.
5
On the give and take between event apprehension and utterance formulation.关于事件理解与话语表述之间的相互作用。
J Mem Lang. 2007 Nov;57(4):544-569. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.01.007.
6
Speech planning during multiple-object naming: effects of ageing.多物体命名过程中的言语规划:衰老的影响
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Aug;61(8):1217-38. doi: 10.1080/17470210701467912.
7
Capacity demands of phoneme selection in word production: new evidence from dual-task experiments.词汇生成中音素选择的容量需求:来自双任务实验的新证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Jul;34(4):886-99. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.886.
8
Tracing attention and the activation flow of spoken word planning using eye movements.利用眼动追踪注意力和口语单词规划的激活流程。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Mar;34(2):353-68. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.2.353.
9
A case for inhibition: visual attention suppresses the processing of irrelevant objects.抑制的一个实例:视觉注意力会抑制无关物体的处理。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2008 Feb;137(1):116-30. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.137.1.116.
10
Halting in Single Word Production: A Test of the Perceptual Loop Theory of Speech Monitoring.单字产出停顿:言语监测的感知循环理论测试
J Mem Lang. 2006 May;54(4):515-540. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2005.11.002.