Suppr超能文献

0.5%左旋布比卡因局部麻醉剂在改良根治性乳房切除术后手术伤口灌注的成本效益分析。

Cost-effectiveness analysis of levobupivacaine 0.5 %, a local anesthetic, infusion in the surgical wound after modified radical mastectomy.

作者信息

Ferreira Laso Lourdes, López Picado Amanda, Antoñanzas Villar Fernando, Lamata de la Orden Laura, Ceballos Garcia Mar, Ibañez López Carolina, Pipaon Ruilope Lorena, Lamata Hernandez Felix, Valero Martinez Cesar, Aizpuru Felipe, Hernandez Chaves Roberto

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Postoperative Care, San Peter Hospital, Logroño, Spain,

出版信息

Clin Drug Investig. 2015 Sep;35(9):575-82. doi: 10.1007/s40261-015-0316-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Effective treatment of postoperative pain contributes to decreasing the rate of complications as well as the total cost of the operated patients. The aim of this study was to analyze the costs and the efficiency of use of continuous infusion of levobupivacaine 0.5 % with the help of an infusion pump in modified radical mastectomy.

METHODS

A cost calculation of the analgesic procedures (continuous infusion of levobupivacaine 0.5 % [levobupivacaine group (LG)] or saline [saline group (SG)] (2 ml/h 48 h) has been carried out based on the data of a previous clinical trial (double-blind randomized study) of patients who underwent modified radical mastectomy surgery. The measure of the effectiveness was the point reduction of pain derived from the verbal numeric rating scale (VNRS). The usual incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was performed.

RESULTS

Considering only the intravenous analgesia, overall costs were lower in LG, as less analgesia was used (EUR14.06 ± 7.89 vs. 27.47 ± 14.79; p < 0.001). In this study the costs of the infusion pump were not calculated as it was used by both groups and they offset each other. However, if the infusion pump costs were included, costs would be higher in the LG, (EUR91.89 ± 7.89 vs. 27.47 ± 14.79; p < 0.001) and then the ICER was -8.51, meaning that for every extra point of decrease in the pain verbal numerical rating score over the 2-day period, the cost increased by EUR8.51.

CONCLUSION

Infiltration of local anesthetics is an effective technique for controlling postoperative pain and the associated added costs are relatively low in relation to the total cost of mastectomy, therefore providing patients with a higher quality of care in the prevention of pain.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov: reference number NCT01389934. http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01389934

摘要

背景与目的

有效治疗术后疼痛有助于降低并发症发生率以及手术患者的总体费用。本研究的目的是分析在改良根治性乳房切除术中借助输液泵持续输注0.5%左旋布比卡因的成本及使用效率。

方法

基于先前一项对接受改良根治性乳房切除术患者的临床试验(双盲随机研究)数据,对镇痛程序(持续输注0.5%左旋布比卡因[左旋布比卡因组(LG)]或生理盐水[生理盐水组(SG)](2毫升/小时,共48小时))进行了成本计算。有效性的衡量指标是言语数字评定量表(VNRS)得出的疼痛评分降低值。计算了常规增量成本-效果比(ICER)。

结果

仅考虑静脉镇痛时,LG组的总体成本较低,因为使用的镇痛药物较少(14.06±7.89欧元对27.47±14.79欧元;p<0.001)。在本研究中,未计算输液泵的成本,因为两组均使用且相互抵消。然而,如果计入输液泵成本,LG组的成本会更高(91.89±7.89欧元对27.47±14.79欧元;p<0.001),此时ICER为-8.51,这意味着在为期2天的时间里,疼痛言语数字评分每额外降低1分,成本增加8.51欧元。

结论

局部麻醉药浸润是控制术后疼痛的有效技术,相对于乳房切除术的总成本,相关额外成本相对较低,因此在预防疼痛方面为患者提供了更高的护理质量。

临床试验注册

clinicaltrials.gov:注册号NCT01389934。http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01389934

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验