Suppr超能文献

根治性前列腺切除术改良的临床整合随机试验可行性研究。

Feasibility study of a clinically-integrated randomized trial of modifications to radical prostatectomy.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 11215, USA.

出版信息

Trials. 2012 Feb 24;13:23. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Numerous technical modifications to radical prostatectomy have been proposed. Such modifications are likely to lead to only slight improvements in outcomes. Although small differences would be worthwhile, an appropriately powered randomized trial would need to be very large, and thus of doubtful feasibility given the expense, complexity and regulatory burden of contemporary clinical trials. We have proposed a novel methodology, the clinically-integrated randomized trial, which dramatically streamlines trial procedures in order to reduce the marginal cost of an additional patient towards zero. We aimed to determine the feasibility of implementing such a trial for radical prostatectomy.

METHODS

Patients undergoing radical prostatectomy as initial treatment for prostate cancer were randomized in a factorial design to involvement of the fascia during placement of the anastomotic sutures, urethral irrigation, both or neither. Endpoint data were obtained from routine clinical documentation. Accrual and compliance rates were monitored to determine the feasibility of the trial.

RESULTS

From a total of 260 eligible patients, 154 (59%) consented; 56 patients declined to participate, 20 were not approached on recommendation of the treating surgeon, and 30 were not approached for logistical reasons. Although recording by surgeons of the procedure used was incomplete (~80%), compliance with randomization was excellent when it was recorded, with only 6% of procedures inconsistent with allocation. Outcomes data was received from 71% of patients at one year. This improved to 83% as the trial progressed.

CONCLUSIONS

A clinically-integrated randomized trial was conducted at low cost, with excellent accrual, and acceptable compliance with treatment allocation and outcomes reporting. This demonstrates the feasibility of the methodology. Improved methods to ensure documentation of surgical procedures would be required before wider implementation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00928850.

摘要

背景

许多根治性前列腺切除术的技术改良已经被提出。这些改良可能只会导致结果的轻微改善。尽管微小的差异是值得的,但由于当代临床试验的费用、复杂性和监管负担,需要进行一项适当规模的、具有强大效能的随机试验,这在可行性方面存在疑问。我们提出了一种新的方法,即临床整合随机试验,该方法极大地简化了试验程序,以便将额外患者的边际成本降低到接近零。我们旨在确定实施这种根治性前列腺切除术随机试验的可行性。

方法

接受根治性前列腺切除术作为前列腺癌初始治疗的患者,以筋膜在吻合缝线放置期间的参与、尿道冲洗、两者或两者均不参与,按析因设计进行随机分组。终点数据来自常规临床记录。监测入组率和依从率,以确定试验的可行性。

结果

在总共 260 名合格患者中,有 154 名(59%)同意参与;56 名患者拒绝参与,20 名患者因治疗医生的建议而未被纳入,30 名患者因后勤原因而未被纳入。尽管外科医生对所用手术过程的记录不完整(约 80%),但当记录时,随机分组的依从性非常好,只有 6%的手术与分配不一致。在一年时,从 71%的患者中收到了结果数据。随着试验的进展,这一比例提高到 83%。

结论

以低成本实施了临床整合随机试验,具有良好的入组率和对治疗分配及结果报告的可接受的依从性。这证明了该方法的可行性。需要改进方法以确保手术过程的记录,然后才能更广泛地实施。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00928850。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ef4/3298715/0b3ed43ebde8/1745-6215-13-23-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验