Ekinci Selim, Yeşil Murat, Bayata Serdar, Arikan Erdinç, Vurgun Veysel Kutay, Postaci Nursen, Safak Ozgen, Ozdemir Emre
Clinic of Cardiology, Atatürk Teaching Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.
Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2012 May;12(3):208-13. doi: 10.5152/akd.2012.063. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
This study investigated the effect of coronary artery disease (CAD) severity, distribution and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on acute ventricular pacing threshold and lead impedance at the time of pacemaker implantation.
One hundred and thirty-two patients who received a ventricular pacemaker or internal cardioverter-defibrilator (ICD) lead in our institution between 2007-2010 were included in this observational study. Patients were divided into ICD and anti-bradycardic pacemaker (PM) groups. Groups were compared for ventricular stimulation threshold, lead impedance and LVEF. Later, groups were sub-grouped according to the severity and distribution of CAD and subgroups were compared in both groups for ventricular stimulation threshold, lead impedance. Quantitative data of groups were compared by means of independent samples t-test.
Ventricular pacing thresholds were found significantly higher ICD group compared with PM group (p<0.05). Impedance and LVEF values were significantly lower in ICD group (p<0.05). Impedance and ventricular pacing thresholds were comparable in subgroups of ICD and PM groups. Our study does not confirm any relationship between pacing parameters and severity-distribution of CAD and LVEF.
Patients with ventricular ICD lead had higher pacing thresholds but lower pacing impedance values comparing with PM group. This study did not find any significant relationship between pacing parameters at implantation and LVEF, severity and distribution of CAD.
本研究调查了冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的严重程度、分布及左心室射血分数(LVEF)对起搏器植入时急性心室起搏阈值和导线阻抗的影响。
本观察性研究纳入了2007年至2010年间在我院接受心室起搏器或植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)导线的132例患者。患者分为ICD组和抗心动过缓起搏器(PM)组。比较两组的心室刺激阈值、导线阻抗和LVEF。随后,根据CAD的严重程度和分布将两组再进行亚组划分,并比较亚组间的心室刺激阈值和导线阻抗。采用独立样本t检验比较各组的定量数据。
发现ICD组的心室起搏阈值显著高于PM组(p<0.05)。ICD组的阻抗和LVEF值显著较低(p<0.05)。ICD组和PM组亚组间的阻抗和心室起搏阈值具有可比性。我们的研究未证实起搏参数与CAD的严重程度-分布及LVEF之间存在任何关系。
与PM组相比,植入心室ICD导线的患者起搏阈值较高,但起搏阻抗值较低。本研究未发现植入时的起搏参数与LVEF、CAD的严重程度和分布之间存在任何显著关系。