• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

许多患者在反流性疾病检测结果呈阴性后仍继续使用质子泵抑制剂。

Many patients continue using proton pump inhibitors after negative results from tests for reflux disease.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA.

出版信息

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Jun;10(6):620-5; quiz e57. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.02.012. Epub 2012 Feb 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.cgh.2012.02.012
PMID:22366177
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3547497/
Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Ambulatory reflux testing is used to evaluate symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) refractory to protein pump inhibitors (PPIs). We investigated the prevalence of PPI use in patients with negative results from Bravo pH or multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) tests and factors that might predict the use of PPIs.

METHODS

We analyzed data from patients who had undergone Bravo pH monitoring or MII-pH testing at Northwestern University, without evidence of reflux disease. Demographics, endoscopy findings, pathology results, and provider recommendations were obtained via chart review. Eligible patients (n = 90) were contacted by telephone, and a cross-sectional survey was administered with questions about symptom severity, demographics, medication use, and health behaviors. Patients were compared by current PPI use, and statistical analyses were performed by using SAS version 9.2 software.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients (42.2%) reported current PPI use despite a negative result from a pH study. Only 17 patients (18.9%) recalled being instructed to stop taking PPIs; chart review showed documented instructions to stop PPI therapy for 15 patients (16.7%). There were no significant differences in demographic or clinical characteristics among patients compared by current PPI use. Patients taking a PPI were more likely than those not taking a PPI to report troublesome symptoms that affected their daily life, as measured by a questionnaire for the diagnosis of GERD (the GerdQ).

CONCLUSIONS

More than 42% of patients with negative results from pH monitoring studies continue PPI therapy despite physiological data that they do not have GERD.

摘要

背景与目的

门诊反流测试用于评估对质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)治疗无反应的胃食管反流病(GERD)的症状。我们研究了 Bravo pH 或多通道腔内阻抗-pH(MII-pH)测试结果为阴性的患者中 PPI 使用的流行率,以及可能预测 PPI 使用的因素。

方法

我们分析了在西北大学接受 Bravo pH 监测或 MII-pH 测试且无反流性疾病证据的患者的数据。通过病历回顾获得人口统计学、内镜检查结果、病理学结果和提供者建议。通过电话联系符合条件的患者(n=90),并进行横断面调查,调查内容包括症状严重程度、人口统计学、药物使用和健康行为。通过当前 PPI 使用情况对患者进行比较,并使用 SAS 版本 9.2 软件进行统计分析。

结果

尽管 pH 研究结果为阴性,但 38 名患者(42.2%)报告目前正在使用 PPI。只有 17 名患者(18.9%)记得被指示停止使用 PPI;病历审查显示,有 15 名患者(16.7%)有记录的停止 PPI 治疗的医嘱。根据当前 PPI 使用情况比较患者时,在人口统计学或临床特征方面没有显著差异。与未使用 PPI 的患者相比,使用 PPI 的患者更有可能报告影响其日常生活的麻烦症状,这是通过 GERD 诊断问卷(GerdQ)来衡量的。

结论

尽管生理数据表明他们没有 GERD,但超过 42%的 pH 监测研究结果为阴性的患者仍继续使用 PPI 治疗。

相似文献

1
Many patients continue using proton pump inhibitors after negative results from tests for reflux disease.许多患者在反流性疾病检测结果呈阴性后仍继续使用质子泵抑制剂。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Jun;10(6):620-5; quiz e57. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.02.012. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
2
Gastroesophageal reflux disease-related symptom recurrence in patients discontinuing proton pump inhibitors for Bravo wireless esophageal pH monitoring study.用于Bravo无线食管pH监测研究的停用质子泵抑制剂患者的胃食管反流病相关症状复发情况
Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 2017 Oct-Dec;82(4):277-286. doi: 10.1016/j.rgmx.2016.12.007. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
3
Proton pump inhibitor responders who are not confirmed as GERD patients with impedance and pH monitoring: who are they?质子泵抑制剂反应者,经阻抗和 pH 监测未被确认为 GERD 患者:他们是谁?
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014 Jan;26(1):28-35. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12221. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
4
Twice-daily proton pump inhibitor therapy does not decrease the frequency of reflux episodes during nocturnal recumbency in patients with refractory GERD: analysis of 200 patients using multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH testing.每日两次质子泵抑制剂治疗并未降低难治性 GERD 患者夜间卧位时反流发作的频率:使用多通道腔内阻抗-pH 监测对 200 例患者的分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2012 Nov-Dec;25(8):682-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2011.01310.x. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
5
How many cases of laryngopharyngeal reflux suspected by laryngoscopy are gastroesophageal reflux disease-related?经喉镜检查怀疑的咽反流病例中有多少与胃食管反流病有关?
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Aug 28;18(32):4363-70. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i32.4363.
6
Positive predictors for gastroesophageal reflux disease and the therapeutic response to proton-pump inhibitors.胃食管反流病的阳性预测指标及对质子泵抑制剂的治疗反应。
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Apr 14;20(14):4017-24. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i14.4017.
7
Tailored therapy for the refractory GERD patients by combined multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring.通过联合多通道腔内阻抗-pH监测为难治性胃食管反流病患者量身定制治疗方案。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Feb;31(2):350-4. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13049.
8
Predictors of proton pump inhibitor failure in non-erosive reflux disease: A study with impedance-pH monitoring and high-resolution manometry.非糜烂性反流病中质子泵抑制剂治疗失败的预测因素:一项阻抗- pH监测和高分辨率测压研究
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016 May;28(5):674-9. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12763. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
9
Most Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Who Failed Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy Also Have Functional Esophageal Disorders.大多数质子泵抑制剂治疗失败的胃食管反流病患者也存在功能性食管疾病。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 May;17(6):1073-1080.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.06.018. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
10
Ambulatory Reflux Monitoring Guides Proton Pump Inhibitor Discontinuation in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Symptoms: A Clinical Trial.动态反流监测指导胃食管反流症状患者停用质子泵抑制剂:一项临床试验
Gastroenterology. 2021 Jan;160(1):174-182.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.09.013. Epub 2020 Sep 16.

引用本文的文献

1
A scientometrics analysis and visualization of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease.难治性胃食管反流病的科学计量学分析与可视化
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jul 30;15:1393526. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1393526. eCollection 2024.
2
Proton Pump Inhibitors: Rational Use and Use-Reduction - The Windsor Workshop.质子泵抑制剂:合理使用与减少使用——温莎研讨会。
Dig Dis. 2024;42(3):211-220. doi: 10.1159/000538399. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
3
Holistic management of symptomatic reflux: rising to the challenge of proton pump inhibitor overuse.

本文引用的文献

1
A prospective study to compare a symptom-based reflux disease questionnaire to 48-h wireless pH monitoring for the identification of gastroesophageal reflux (revised 2-26-11).一项前瞻性研究比较基于症状的反流病问卷与 48 小时无线 pH 监测在胃食管反流病诊断中的作用(修订于 2011 年 2 月 26 日)。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2011 Sep;106(9):1604-11. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.180. Epub 2011 Jun 21.
2
Magnitude and economic effect of overuse of antisecretory therapy in the ambulatory care setting.门诊环境中抗分泌治疗过度使用的程度和经济影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2010 Sep;16(9):e228-34.
3
Systematic review: persistent reflux symptoms on proton pump inhibitor therapy in primary care and community studies.
有症状反流的整体管理:应对质子泵抑制剂过度使用的挑战
Br J Gen Pract. 2022 Oct 27;72(724):541-544. doi: 10.3399/bjgp22X721157. Print 2022 Nov.
4
Epidemiological Study Assessing the Overuse of Proton Pump Inhibitors in Lebanese Population.评估黎巴嫩人群中质子泵抑制剂过度使用情况的流行病学研究。
Middle East J Dig Dis. 2020 Oct;12(4):265-270. doi: 10.34172/mejdd.2020.192.
5
The Spectrum of Reflux Phenotypes.反流表型谱
Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2019 Dec;15(12):646-654.
6
Perceptions of patient-centered care among Veterans with gastroesophageal reflux disease on proton pump inhibitor therapy.接受质子泵抑制剂治疗的胃食管反流病退伍军人对以患者为中心的护理的认知
Patient Exp J. 2018;5(3):149-159. doi: 10.35680/2372-0247.1232.
7
Management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: Patient and physician communication challenges and shared decision making.胃食管反流病的管理:患者与医生沟通面临的挑战及共同决策
World J Clin Cases. 2018 Dec 6;6(15):892-900. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i15.892.
8
The Proton Pump Inhibitor Nonresponder: a Behavioral Approach to Improvement and Wellness.质子泵抑制剂无反应者:改善与健康的行为学方法
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2018 Jun 9;20(7):34. doi: 10.1007/s11894-018-0641-x.
9
Influence of proton pump inhibitors in the development of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.质子泵抑制剂在自发性细菌性腹膜炎发生发展中的作用
World J Hepatol. 2017 Dec 18;9(35):1278-1285. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v9.i35.1278.
10
Acid-Suppressive Therapy and Risk of Infections: Pros and Cons.抑酸治疗与感染风险:利弊分析
Clin Drug Investig. 2017 Jul;37(7):587-624. doi: 10.1007/s40261-017-0519-y.
系统评价:初级保健和社区研究中质子泵抑制剂治疗后持续性反流症状。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Sep;32(6):720-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04406.x.
4
Marked increase in proton pump inhibitors use in Australia.质子泵抑制剂在澳大利亚的使用显著增加。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010 Oct;19(10):1019-24. doi: 10.1002/pds.1969.
5
Do patients with globus sensation respond to hypnotically assisted relaxation therapy? A case series report.患者出现球感症状时会对催眠辅助放松治疗有反应吗?一项病例系列报告。
Dis Esophagus. 2010 Sep;23(7):545-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2010.01064.x. Epub 2010 May 4.
6
The development of a clinical outcomes survey research application: Assessment Center.临床结局调查研究应用程序的开发:评估中心。
Qual Life Res. 2010 Jun;19(5):677-85. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9634-4. Epub 2010 Mar 21.
7
Trends in gastroesophageal reflux disease as measured by the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.《全国门诊医疗调查衡量的胃食管反流病趋势》。
Dig Dis Sci. 2010 Jul;55(7):1911-7. doi: 10.1007/s10620-009-1004-0. Epub 2009 Oct 15.
8
Development of the GerdQ, a tool for the diagnosis and management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in primary care.胃食管反流病诊断和管理工具 GerdQ 的开发。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Nov 15;30(10):1030-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04142.x. Epub 2009 Sep 8.
9
Treatment patterns and symptom control in patients with GERD: US community-based survey.胃食管反流病患者的治疗模式与症状控制:基于美国社区的调查
Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Aug;25(8):1869-78. doi: 10.1185/03007990903035745.
10
Unmet medical needs among patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a foundation for improving management in primary care.胃食管反流病患者未满足的医疗需求:改善基层医疗管理的基础。
Dig Dis. 2009;27(1):62-7. doi: 10.1159/000210106. Epub 2009 May 8.