Suppr超能文献

两种方法从粪便中提取隐孢子虫 DNA 的比较,采用实时 PCR 法检测。

A comparison of two approaches to extracting Cryptosporidium DNA from human stools as measured by a real-time PCR assay.

机构信息

UK Cryptosporidium Reference Unit, Public Health Wales Microbiology, Singleton Hospital, Swansea, SA2 8QA, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Microbiol Methods. 2012 Apr;89(1):38-40. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2012.02.006. Epub 2012 Feb 16.

Abstract

Direct extraction of Cryptosporidium DNA from 46 stools by bead-beating, guanidine thiocyanate and silica purification provided slightly lower PCR positivity (93.5% vs. 100%) and higher threshold cycle values (mean 34.93 vs. 28.03; P=0.00) than spin-column extraction from boiled, semi-purified oocyst suspensions. However, direct extraction is cheaper, and amenable to automation.

摘要

通过珠磨、硫氰酸胍和硅胶纯化直接从 46 份粪便中提取隐孢子虫 DNA 的 PCR 阳性率(93.5%对 100%)略低,阈值循环值(平均值 34.93 对 28.03;P=0.00)也更高,而煮沸、半纯化卵囊悬浮液的螺旋柱提取则更高。然而,直接提取更便宜,也更适合自动化。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验