Suppr超能文献

采用基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱法直接从阳性血培养肉汤中进行细菌鉴定的内部方法与商业 Sepsityper™试剂盒的比较。

Comparison of an in-house method and the commercial Sepsityper™ kit for bacterial identification directly from positive blood culture broths by matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry.

机构信息

Department of Microbiology, Saint-Pierre University Hospital and Jules Bordet Institute, rue Haute 322, 1000, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012 Sep;31(9):2269-81. doi: 10.1007/s10096-012-1566-1. Epub 2012 Feb 25.

Abstract

The identification of bacteria directly from positive blood cultures using matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) is a new challenge to microbiologists. However, the protocols previously described are often difficult to implement in routine and comparisons are not always possible due to the variability of interpretative criteria. This study evaluated the analytical and practical performances of an in-house (IH) method, adapted from previous protocols, and the Sepsityper™ kit (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany). Positive blood cultures from 63 different patients were prospectively evaluated by both methods. To enhance the sensitivity of these methods, lowered cut-offs were assessed and validated on 66 additional samples. The IH method produced 86.4% and 73.7% correct genus and species identifications, respectively, when using the lowered cut-offs of 1.4 and 1.6 for correct genus and species identifications. The Sepsityper™ kit showed similar results (78.0% and 68.4% correct genus and species identification, respectively). However, the IH method is ten-fold less expensive than the commercial option (0.72 vs. 7.45 /analysis) and its turnaround time is approximately 20 min versus the nearly 40 min required for the Sepsityper™ kit, which includes an extraction step. Finally, the IH method was introduced twice-daily in our routine practice.

摘要

直接从阳性血培养物中使用基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)鉴定细菌对微生物学家来说是一个新的挑战。然而,以前描述的方案通常很难在常规中实施,并且由于解释标准的可变性,比较并不总是可能的。本研究评估了一种内部(IH)方法的分析和实际性能,该方法是根据以前的方案改编的,以及 Sepsityper™试剂盒(Bruker Daltonics,不来梅,德国)。通过这两种方法对 63 名不同患者的阳性血培养物进行了前瞻性评估。为了提高这些方法的灵敏度,评估并验证了 66 个额外样本的降低截止值。当使用降低的 1.4 和 1.6 的截止值进行正确的属和种鉴定时,IH 方法分别产生 86.4%和 73.7%的正确属和种鉴定。Sepsityper™试剂盒显示出类似的结果(分别为 78.0%和 68.4%的正确属和种鉴定)。然而,IH 方法比商业选择便宜十倍(0.72 欧元与 7.45 欧元/分析),其周转时间约为 20 分钟,而 Sepsityper™试剂盒则需要近 40 分钟,其中包括提取步骤。最后,IH 方法在我们的常规实践中每天引入两次。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验