• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

简易认知障碍筛查:蒙特利尔认知评估的巴西版验证。

Brief screening for mild cognitive impairment: validation of the Brazilian version of the Montreal cognitive assessment.

机构信息

Laboratory of Neuroscience, Department and Institute of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013 Jan;28(1):34-40. doi: 10.1002/gps.3787. Epub 2012 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1002/gps.3787
PMID:22368034
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a brief cognitive schedule that has been developed for the screening of patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). MCI is recognized as a high-risk state for Alzheimer's disease. The aim of the present study is to examine the reliability and validity of the Brazilian version of the MoCA test (MoCA-BR) in a sample of older individuals with at least 4 years of education.

METHODS

The MoCA-BR was administered to 112 older adults who were classified into three diagnostic groups according to their cognitive state (Alzheimer's disease, n = 28; MCI, n = 43; normal controls, n = 41). This procedure was based on clinical and neuropsychological data. The performance in the MoCA-BR was compared with the Mini-mental state examination (MMSE) and the Cambridge Cognitive Examination. Diagnostic accuracy was examined with the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses.

RESULTS

Cronbach's alpha for the MoCA-BR was 0.75. Temporal stability (retesting after 3 months) using intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.75 (p < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of the MoCA-BR for MCI were 81% and 77%, respectively, with a cut-off score of 25 points. The area under the ROC curve for predicting MCI was 0.82 ± 0.06.

CONCLUSIONS

The present results indicate that the MoCA-BR maintains its core diagnostic properties rendering it a valid and reliable tool for the screening of MCI among older individuals with at least 4 years of education.

摘要

背景

蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)是一种简短的认知量表,专为轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者的筛查而开发。MCI 被认为是阿尔茨海默病的高危状态。本研究旨在检验具有至少 4 年教育程度的老年个体中 MoCA 测试的巴西版本(MoCA-BR)的可靠性和有效性。

方法

MoCA-BR 被用于 112 名老年人,他们根据认知状态分为三组:阿尔茨海默病组(n = 28)、MCI 组(n = 43)和正常对照组(n = 41)。这一过程基于临床和神经心理学数据。MoCA-BR 的表现与简易精神状态检查(MMSE)和剑桥认知测验进行了比较。诊断准确性通过接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析进行了检验。

结果

MoCA-BR 的 Cronbach's alpha 为 0.75。使用组内相关系数进行的时间稳定性(3 个月后重测)为 0.75(p < 0.001)。MoCA-BR 对 MCI 的敏感性和特异性分别为 81%和 77%,截断分数为 25 分。预测 MCI 的 ROC 曲线下面积为 0.82 ± 0.06。

结论

本研究结果表明,MoCA-BR 保持了其核心诊断特性,使其成为具有至少 4 年教育程度的老年个体中 MCI 筛查的有效且可靠的工具。

相似文献

1
Brief screening for mild cognitive impairment: validation of the Brazilian version of the Montreal cognitive assessment.简易认知障碍筛查:蒙特利尔认知评估的巴西版验证。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013 Jan;28(1):34-40. doi: 10.1002/gps.3787. Epub 2012 Feb 27.
2
Brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment in older Japanese: validation of the Japanese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment.用于老年日本人轻度认知障碍的简易筛查工具:蒙特利尔认知评估的日语版验证。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2010 Jul;10(3):225-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0594.2010.00585.x. Epub 2010 Feb 4.
3
Brief screening for mild cognitive impairment in elderly outpatient clinic: validation of the Korean version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment.老年门诊轻度认知障碍的简易筛查:韩国版蒙特利尔认知评估量表的效度验证
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2008 Jun;21(2):104-10. doi: 10.1177/0891988708316855.
4
Montreal Cognitive Assessment Arabic version: reliability and validity prevalence of mild cognitive impairment among elderly attending geriatric clubs in Cairo.蒙特利尔认知评估阿拉伯语版本:开罗老年俱乐部中老年人轻度认知障碍的可靠性、有效性及患病率
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2009 Mar;9(1):54-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0594.2008.00509.x.
5
CAMcog as a screening tool for diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment and dementia in a Brazilian clinical sample of moderate to high education.在巴西中等至高学历临床样本中,CAMcog作为轻度认知障碍和痴呆症诊断的筛查工具。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008 Nov;23(11):1127-33. doi: 10.1002/gps.2038.
6
Cross validation of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in community dwelling older adults residing in the Southeastern US.美国东南部社区居住的老年人中蒙特利尔认知评估的交叉验证
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009 Feb;24(2):197-201. doi: 10.1002/gps.2101.
7
Accuracy and Psychometric Properties of the Brazilian Version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment as a Brief Screening Tool for Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease in the Initial Stages in the Elderly.《蒙特利尔认知评估巴西版作为老年人轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默病初始阶段简易筛查工具的准确性和心理测量学特性》
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2019;47(4-6):366-374. doi: 10.1159/000501308. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
8
Screening of mild cognitive impairment in Chinese older adults--a multistage validation of the Chinese abbreviated mild cognitive impairment test.中国老年人轻度认知障碍的筛查——中文版简易轻度认知障碍测试的多阶段验证
Neuroepidemiology. 2008;30(1):6-12. doi: 10.1159/000113300. Epub 2008 Jan 17.
9
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): validation study for frontotemporal dementia.蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA):用于额颞叶痴呆的验证研究。
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2012 Sep;25(3):146-54. doi: 10.1177/0891988712455235. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
10
Does the combination of the MMSE and clock drawing test (mini-clock) improve the detection of mild Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment?简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)和画钟测验(mini-clock)联合应用是否能提高轻度阿尔茨海默病和轻度认知障碍的检出率?
J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;22(3):889-96. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2010-101182.

引用本文的文献

1
The concordance between the Montreal cognitive assessment and the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status as a cognitive screening tool in a south African community sample.在南非社区样本中,蒙特利尔认知评估量表与可重复神经心理状态评估量表作为认知筛查工具的一致性。
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2025 Aug 8;12:e96. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2025.10050. eCollection 2025.
2
The influence of dual-task activities on spatiotemporal gait parameters in patients with cardiovascular diseases.双重任务活动对心血管疾病患者时空步态参数的影响。
JRSM Cardiovasc Dis. 2025 Jun 25;14:20480040251351403. doi: 10.1177/20480040251351403. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
Psychometric properties of screening tools for mild cognitive impairment in older adults based on COSMIN guidelines: a systematic review.
基于COSMIN指南的老年人轻度认知障碍筛查工具的心理测量学特性:一项系统综述
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Jun 2;25(1):401. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06030-4.
4
Longitudinal Analysis of Intrinsic Capacity and Other Risk Factors in Aging: FREVO Study Protocol.衰老过程中内在能力及其他风险因素的纵向分析:FREVO研究方案
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Apr 25;13(9):993. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13090993.
5
Hearing Loss and Cognitive Function: An Analysis in Older Adults at the Beginning of the Auditory Rehabilitation Process.听力损失与认知功能:听觉康复过程开始时对老年人的一项分析。
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Apr;77(4):1792-1799. doi: 10.1007/s12070-025-05403-w. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
6
Neuropsychiatric symptoms and specific cognitive domains in mild cognitive impairment.轻度认知障碍中的神经精神症状和特定认知领域
Dement Neuropsychol. 2025 Jan 13;18:e20240187. doi: 10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2024-0187. eCollection 2024.
7
Effects of high-intensity interval and moderate-intensity continuous training on ambulatory blood pressure and cardiovascular outcomes in older adults with hypertension (HEXA Study): study protocol for a randomised trial.高强度间歇训练和中等强度持续训练对老年高血压患者动态血压及心血管结局的影响(HEXA研究):一项随机试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 20;14(12):e084736. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084736.
8
Multifactorial assessment of braking time predictors in a driving simulator among older adults according to gender.根据性别,在驾驶模拟器中对老年人制动时间预测因子进行多因素评估。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2024 Jul 4;79:100405. doi: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100405. eCollection 2024.
9
Resistance Training with Instability Does Not Hamper Total Training Volume and Muscle Strength Gains in Older Adults: a Secondary Analysis from REI Study.不稳定性抗阻训练不会阻碍老年人的总训练量和肌肉力量增长:REI研究的二次分析
Can Geriatr J. 2024 Jun 3;27(2):133-140. doi: 10.5770/cgj.27.730. eCollection 2024 Jun.
10
Factors that indicate performance on the MoCA 7.3 in healthy adults over 50 years old.影响 50 岁以上健康成年人完成 MoCA 7.3 测试表现的因素。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jun 1;24(1):482. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05102-1.