• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨膜瓣移植与黏膜下结缔组织移植治疗牙龈退缩的对比研究。

Comparison of periosteal pedicle graft and subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival recession defects.

机构信息

Department of Periodontics, Himachal Pradesh Government Dental College and Hospital, Shimla, India.

出版信息

Aust Dent J. 2012 Mar;57(1):51-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2011.01648.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1834-7819.2011.01648.x
PMID:22369558
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of periosteum as a pedicle graft in the treatment of gingival recession defects is a recent advancement. The subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) is considered the gold standard for the treatment of gingival recession defects. The present randomized controlled trial was done to compare periosteal pedicle graft (PPG) with SCTG for the treatment of gingival recession defects.

METHODS

10 males and 10 females between the ages of 16 and 40 years (mean age 25.2 years) with Miller's Class I and II recessions ≥3 mm participated in this one-year clinical study. They were assigned randomly to test group (PPG) and control group (SCTG). Results were evaluated based on parameters measuring patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes associated with two treatment procedures. Significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

At the end of the study, the defect coverage was 3.1 ± 0.13 mm or 92.6% in the test group compared to the control group in which the defect coverage was 2.70 ± 0.11 mm or 88.5%. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). The average residual defect was comparable between the two groups, i.e. 0.3 ± 0.67 and 0.5 ± 0.84 in the PPG and SCTG group respectively. The test group was rated higher in terms of overall patient satisfaction (p < 0.02) and comfort during and after the procedure (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

PPG and SCTG have comparable clinical effectiveness, but PPG is superior to SCTG in terms of patient-centred outcomes, reflecting improved patient comfort and overall patient satisfaction.

摘要

背景

使用骨膜作为带蒂移植物治疗牙龈退缩缺陷是最近的一项进展。上皮下结缔组织移植物(SCTG)被认为是治疗牙龈退缩缺陷的金标准。本随机对照试验旨在比较骨膜蒂瓣移植(PPG)和 SCTG 治疗牙龈退缩缺陷。

方法

10 名年龄在 16 至 40 岁之间(平均年龄 25.2 岁)的男性和 10 名女性,患有 Miller Ⅰ类和Ⅱ类退缩≥3mm,参与了这项为期一年的临床研究。他们被随机分配到实验组(PPG)和对照组(SCTG)。结果根据评估患者满意度和与两种治疗程序相关的临床结果的参数进行评估。设 p < 0.05 为有统计学意义。

结果

研究结束时,实验组的缺陷覆盖率为 3.1 ± 0.13mm 或 92.6%,而对照组的缺陷覆盖率为 2.70 ± 0.11mm 或 88.5%。两组之间的差异具有统计学意义(p < 0.0001)。两组之间的平均残余缺陷相当,即 PPG 和 SCTG 组分别为 0.3 ± 0.67mm 和 0.5 ± 0.84mm。实验组在总体患者满意度方面(p < 0.02)和治疗过程中和治疗后的舒适度方面(p < 0.001)的评分更高。

结论

PPG 和 SCTG 具有相当的临床效果,但 PPG 在以患者为中心的结果方面优于 SCTG,反映了患者舒适度的提高和总体患者满意度的提高。

相似文献

1
Comparison of periosteal pedicle graft and subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival recession defects.骨膜瓣移植与黏膜下结缔组织移植治疗牙龈退缩的对比研究。
Aust Dent J. 2012 Mar;57(1):51-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2011.01648.x.
2
Semilunar coronally positioned flap or subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival recession: a 30-month follow-up study.半月形冠向定位瓣或上皮下结缔组织移植治疗牙龈退缩:一项30个月的随访研究。
J Periodontol. 2009 Jul;80(7):1076-82. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.080498.
3
Surgical microscope may enhance root coverage with subepithelial connective tissue graft: a randomized-controlled clinical trial.外科显微镜可能通过皮下结缔组织移植增强根覆盖:一项随机对照临床试验。
J Periodontol. 2012 Jun;83(6):721-30. doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.110202. Epub 2011 Aug 26.
4
Treatment of gingival recession: comparative study between subepithelial connective tissue graft and guided tissue regeneration.牙龈退缩的治疗:上皮下结缔组织移植与引导组织再生的比较研究
J Periodontol. 2000 Sep;71(9):1441-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.2000.71.9.1441.
5
Comparison of 2 techniques of subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recessions.两种上皮下结缔组织移植技术治疗牙龈退缩的比较。
J Periodontol. 2001 Nov;72(11):1470-6. doi: 10.1902/jop.2001.72.11.1470.
6
Comparative clinical evaluation of acellular dermal matrix allograft and connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival recession.脱细胞异体真皮基质与结缔组织移植治疗牙龈退缩的临床对比评估
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006 May 1;7(2):63-70.
7
Treatment of multiple gingival recession defects using periosteal pedicle graft: a case series.采用骨膜蒂瓣移植治疗多发性牙龈退缩缺损:病例系列。
J Periodontol. 2010 Oct;81(10):1426-31. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.100134.
8
Subepithelial connective tissue graft with or without enamel matrix derivative for the treatment of Miller class I and II gingival recessions: a controlled randomized clinical trial.黏膜下结缔组织瓣移植联合或不联合 enamel matrix derivative 治疗Miller Ⅰ类和Ⅱ类牙龈退缩的随机对照临床试验
J Periodontal Res. 2013 Oct;48(5):563-72. doi: 10.1111/jre.12039. Epub 2013 Jan 14.
9
A comparative study of root coverage with connective tissue and platelet concentrate grafts: 8-month results.结缔组织与血小板浓缩物移植用于牙根覆盖的比较研究:8个月结果
J Periodontol. 2004 Dec;75(12):1678-87. doi: 10.1902/jop.2004.75.12.1678.
10
EMD or subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of single gingival recessions: a pilot study.EMD 或黏膜下结缔组织移植治疗单个牙龈退缩:一项初步研究。
J Periodontal Res. 2011 Dec;46(6):637-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2011.01381.x. Epub 2011 Jun 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical efficacy of periosteal pedicle graft as a barrier membrane in guided tissue regeneration: A systematic review and meta-analysis.骨膜蒂移植作为引导组织再生屏障膜的临床疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2024 Jul 12;21:37. eCollection 2024.
2
Clinical effectiveness of periosteal pedicle graft for the management of gingival recession defects-a systematic review and meta-analysis.骨膜蒂移植治疗牙龈退缩缺损的临床效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Evid Based Dent. 2023 Jun;24(2):93-94. doi: 10.1038/s41432-023-00898-0. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
3
Clinical evaluation of periosteal pedicle flap in the treatment of gingival recessions for esthetic root coverage: A randomized controlled clinical trial.
骨膜蒂瓣治疗牙龈退缩以实现美学牙根覆盖的临床评估:一项随机对照临床试验。
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2023 Jan-Feb;27(1):76-81. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_80_22. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
4
Surface Modification of Electrospun Bioresorbable and Biostable Scaffolds by Pulsed DC Magnetron Sputtering of Titanium for Gingival Tissue Regeneration.通过脉冲直流磁控溅射钛对用于牙龈组织再生的电纺生物可吸收和生物稳定支架进行表面改性
Polymers (Basel). 2022 Nov 15;14(22):4922. doi: 10.3390/polym14224922.
5
Autologous Platelet Concentrate of 2 and 3 generations efficacy in the surgical treatment of gingival recession: an overview of systematic reviews.2代和3代自体浓缩血小板在牙龈退缩手术治疗中的疗效:系统评价综述
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2021 Nov-Dec;25(6):463-479. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_515_20. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
6
Clinical efficacy of periosteal pedicle graft with subepithelial connective tissue graft in gingival recession coverage.骨膜蒂移植联合上皮下结缔组织移植覆盖牙龈退缩的临床疗效
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2019 Sep-Oct;23(5):442-447. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_676_18.
7
A New Approach for Root Surface Biomodification Using Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin (I-PRF).采用注射用富血小板纤维蛋白(I-PRF)进行根面生物改性的新方法。
Med Sci Monit. 2019 Jun 26;25:4744-4750. doi: 10.12659/MSM.915142.
8
Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession-type defects.用于治疗局限性和多发性退缩型缺损的牙根覆盖术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 2;10(10):CD007161. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007161.pub3.
9
Clinical Comparison of Full and Partial Double Pedicle Flaps with Connective Tissue Grafts for Treatment of Gingival Recession.全厚和部分双蒂瓣联合结缔组织移植治疗牙龈退缩的临床比较
J Dent (Shiraz). 2016 Sep;17(3):193-200.
10
Periosteal pedicle graft for the treatment of gingival recession defects current status and future prospects: What the evidence suggests?骨膜蒂移植治疗牙龈退缩缺损的现状与未来前景:证据表明了什么?
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2016 Mar-Apr;20(2):220-1. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.170850.