• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社交互动焦虑量表和社交恐惧症量表的缩写形式。

Short forms of the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and the Social Phobia Scale.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL 60115, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 2012;94(3):310-20. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2012.660291. Epub 2012 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1080/00223891.2012.660291
PMID:22369684
Abstract

Mattick and Clarke's (1998) Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS) and Social Phobia Scale (SPS) are commonly used self-report measures that assess 2 dimensions of social anxiety. Given the need for short, readable measures, this research proposes short forms of both scales. Item-level analyses of readability characteristics of the SIAS and SPS items led to the selection of 6 items from each scale for use in the short forms. The SIAS and SPS short forms had reading levels at approximately the 6th and 5th grade level, respectively. Results using nonclinical (Study 1: N = 469) and clinical (Study 2: N = 145) samples identified these short forms as being factorially sound, possessing adequate internal consistency, and having strong convergence with their full-length counterparts. Moreover, these short forms showed convergence with other measures of social anxiety, showed divergence from measures assessing related constructs, and predicted concurrent interpersonal functioning. Recommendations for the use of these short forms are discussed.

摘要

马蒂克和克拉克(1998 年)的社会互动焦虑量表(SIAS)和社交恐惧症量表(SPS)是常用的自评量表,用于评估社交焦虑的两个维度。鉴于需要简短、易读的测量工具,本研究提出了这两个量表的简短形式。对 SIAS 和 SPS 项目可读性特征的项目级分析导致从每个量表中选择 6 个项目用于简短形式。SIAS 和 SPS 简短形式的阅读水平分别约为 6 年级和 5 年级。使用非临床(研究 1:N=469)和临床(研究 2:N=145)样本的结果表明,这些简短形式在因子结构上合理,具有足够的内部一致性,并且与完整形式具有很强的一致性。此外,这些简短形式与其他社交焦虑测量工具具有一致性,与评估相关结构的测量工具具有差异,并预测了同期的人际功能。讨论了使用这些简短形式的建议。

相似文献

1
Short forms of the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and the Social Phobia Scale.社交互动焦虑量表和社交恐惧症量表的缩写形式。
J Pers Assess. 2012;94(3):310-20. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2012.660291. Epub 2012 Feb 27.
2
Development of a short form Social Interaction Anxiety (SIAS) and Social Phobia Scale (SPS) using nonparametric item response theory: the SIAS-6 and the SPS-6.使用非参数项目反应理论开发短式社交互动焦虑(SIAS)和社交恐惧症量表(SPS):SIAS-6 和 SPS-6。
Psychol Assess. 2012 Mar;24(1):66-76. doi: 10.1037/a0024544. Epub 2011 Jul 11.
3
Comparing short forms of the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and the Social Phobia Scale.比较社交互动焦虑量表和社交恐惧症量表的简化版。
Psychol Assess. 2014 Dec;26(4):1116-26. doi: 10.1037/a0037063. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
4
The factor structure of the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and the Social Phobia Scale.社会交往焦虑量表和社交恐惧症量表的因子结构。
J Anxiety Disord. 2011 May;25(4):579-83. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.01.006. Epub 2011 Feb 2.
5
The Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS) and the Social Phobia Scale (SPS): a comparison of two short-form versions.社交互动焦虑量表(SIAS)与社交恐惧症量表(SPS):两种简版的比较
Psychol Assess. 2014 Dec;26(4):1281-1291. doi: 10.1037/a0037313. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
6
Psychometric evaluation of the Social Interaction Phobia Scale.社会交往恐惧症量表的心理计量学评估。
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2012;25(5):529-42. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2011.598150. Epub 2011 Jul 19.
7
Heterocentric language in commonly used measures of social anxiety: recommended alternate wording.常用社交焦虑测量工具中的中心偏向语言:建议的替代措辞。
Behav Ther. 2013 Mar;44(1):1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2012.07.006. Epub 2012 Aug 4.
8
Dimensional structure of the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale according to the analysis of data obtained with a German version.根据德语版数据的分析,社交互动焦虑量表的维度结构。
J Anxiety Disord. 2010 Aug;24(6):596-605. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.03.020. Epub 2010 Apr 4.
9
Refining and validating the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and the Social Phobia Scale.完善并验证社交互动焦虑量表和社交恐惧症量表。
Depress Anxiety. 2009;26(2):E71-81. doi: 10.1002/da.20480.
10
Bigger is better: Full-length versions of the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and Social Phobia Scale outperform short forms at assessing treatment outcome.越大越好:社交互动焦虑量表和社交恐惧症量表的全长版本在评估治疗效果方面比简短版本表现更优。
Psychol Assess. 2018 Nov;30(11):1512-1526. doi: 10.1037/pas0000601. Epub 2018 Aug 2.

引用本文的文献

1
The Chinese version of the stigma of loneliness scale in people with chronic diseases: an assessment of psychometric characteristics.慢性病患者孤独感污名量表中文版:心理测量学特征评估
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 1;25(1):1619. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22743-y.
2
Psychometric Properties of Different Short Forms of Social Interaction Anxiety Scale in Chinese College Students.不同简版社交互动焦虑量表在中国大学生中的心理测量学特性
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024 Oct 3;17:3405-3418. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S486245. eCollection 2024.
3
Reliability and validity evaluation of the stigma of loneliness scale in Chinese college students.
孤独耻辱感量表在中国大学生中的信度和效度评价。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 20;24(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17738-0.
4
Reliability and Validity of Self-Concealment Scale in Chinese Older Adults.中文版老年人自我隐瞒量表的信效度研究
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023 Oct 25;16:4341-4352. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S434491. eCollection 2023.
5
Solitary Cannabis Use and Related Consequences Among College Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间大学生单独使用大麻及相关后果。
J Psychoactive Drugs. 2024 Apr-Jun;56(2):168-176. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2023.2184735. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
6
Development of social anxiety cognition scale for college students: Basing on Hofmann's model of social anxiety disorder.大学生社交焦虑认知量表的编制:基于霍夫曼社交焦虑障碍模型
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 19;14:1080099. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1080099. eCollection 2023.
7
Sensory-processing sensitivity versus the sensory-processing theory: Convergence and divergence.感觉加工敏感性与感觉加工理论:趋同与分歧
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 1;13:1010836. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1010836. eCollection 2022.
8
Network-based methods for psychometric data of eating disorders: A systematic review.基于网络的进食障碍心理测量学数据方法:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 31;17(10):e0276341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276341. eCollection 2022.
9
Momentary patterns of alcohol and cannabis co-use in college students: Assessing the temporal association with anxiety.大学生酒精与大麻同时使用的瞬时模式:评估与焦虑的时间关联。
Cannabis. 2022 Feb 2;5(1):42-58. doi: 10.26828/cannabis/2022.01.005. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
10
Mental Health Care Use and Associated Factors in Systemic Sclerosis: A Scleroderma Patient-Centered Intervention Network Cohort Study.系统性硬化症患者的心理健康护理利用情况及相关因素:一项以硬皮病患者为中心的干预网络队列研究
ACR Open Rheumatol. 2022 Aug;4(8):647-657. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11439. Epub 2022 May 23.