• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大学生社交焦虑认知量表的编制:基于霍夫曼社交焦虑障碍模型

Development of social anxiety cognition scale for college students: Basing on Hofmann's model of social anxiety disorder.

作者信息

Zha Yuxin, Tang Qin, Jin Xiaoru, Cai Xinfei, Gong Wen, Shao Yongcong, Weng Xiechuan

机构信息

School of Psychology, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China.

Department of Neuroscience, Beijing Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 19;14:1080099. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1080099. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1080099
PMID:36743247
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9892844/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To develop the Chinese version of the Social Anxiety Cognition Scale for College Students (SACS-CS) based on Hofmann's model of social anxiety disorder and examine its reliability and validity.

METHODS

Based on literature analysis and structured interviews, a theoretical model was constructed and behavioral examples were collected. According to the results of participants' and experts' evaluations, the initial SACS-CS was developed. The study data were collected from a total of 500 valid participants, randomly divided into two samples. Sample 1 ( = 200) and sample 2 ( = 300) were considered for exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), respectively. Internal reliability and validity were examined using all 500 participants, and temporal reliability was established using sample 3 ( = 70), who completed the scale again after 4 weeks.

RESULTS

The SACS-CS consists of 21 items, grouped under four factors: self-perception, social skills, emotional control, and cost estimation. The four-factor model fits well. The internal consistency coefficient of the scale and the four factors ranged from 0.87 to 0.96, and the test-retest reliability ranged from 0.76 to 0.84. The scores of the scale and the four factors were significantly correlated with the score of the Interaction Anxiousness Scale ( = 0.54-0.64).

DISCUSSION

The SACS-CS possesses good reliability and validity and can be applied in the cognitive assessment of college students' social anxiety. The scale could help people with different social anxiety disorder conditions receive more personalized interventions.

摘要

引言

基于霍夫曼社交焦虑障碍模型开发大学生社交焦虑认知量表中文版(SACS-CS),并检验其信效度。

方法

通过文献分析和结构化访谈构建理论模型并收集行为示例。根据参与者和专家的评估结果,编制SACS-CS初始量表。研究数据共收集了500名有效参与者,随机分为两个样本。样本1(n = 200)和样本2(n = 300)分别用于探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析(CFA)。使用全部500名参与者检验内部信效度,使用样本3(n = 70)建立时间信效度,样本3在4周后再次完成该量表。

结果

SACS-CS由21个项目组成,分为四个因子:自我认知、社交技能、情绪控制和代价估计。四因子模型拟合良好。量表及四个因子的内部一致性系数在0.87至0.96之间,重测信度在0.76至0.84之间。量表及四个因子的得分与交往焦虑量表得分显著相关(r = 0.54 - 0.64)。

讨论

SACS-CS具有良好的信效度,可应用于大学生社交焦虑的认知评估。该量表有助于不同社交焦虑障碍状况的人群获得更具个性化的干预。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ef3/9892844/0cc5c5777cd9/fpsyg-14-1080099-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ef3/9892844/e4d6c9ea4465/fpsyg-14-1080099-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ef3/9892844/e385030edc4a/fpsyg-14-1080099-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ef3/9892844/0cc5c5777cd9/fpsyg-14-1080099-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ef3/9892844/e4d6c9ea4465/fpsyg-14-1080099-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ef3/9892844/e385030edc4a/fpsyg-14-1080099-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ef3/9892844/0cc5c5777cd9/fpsyg-14-1080099-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of social anxiety cognition scale for college students: Basing on Hofmann's model of social anxiety disorder.大学生社交焦虑认知量表的编制:基于霍夫曼社交焦虑障碍模型
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 19;14:1080099. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1080099. eCollection 2023.
2
Measuring self-as-context in Chinese college students: Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of self-as-context scale (C-SACS).测量中国大学生的自我即情境:中文版自我即情境量表(C-SACS)的效度和信度
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 6;13:1051661. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1051661. eCollection 2022.
3
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of social anxiety scale for social media users and cross-sectional investigation into this disorder among college students.社交媒体用户社交焦虑量表中文版的心理测量学评估及大学生该障碍横断面调查。
Compr Psychiatry. 2022 Jul;116:152328. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2022.152328. Epub 2022 May 21.
4
Development and validation of college students' tuberculosis knowledge, attitudes and practices questionnaire (CS-TBKAPQ).大学生结核病知识、态度和行为问卷(CS-TBKAPQ)的编制与验证
BMC Public Health. 2017 Dec 12;17(1):949. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4960-x.
5
Development and validation of Chinese college students' future employability scale.中国大学生未来就业能力量表的编制与验证
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 23;14:1063437. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1063437. eCollection 2023.
6
Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support.多维感知社会支持量表中文版的心理测量特性
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024 May 31;17:2233-2241. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S463245. eCollection 2024.
7
Translation and psychometric evaluation of Smartphone Addiction Scale-Short Version (SAS-SV) among Chinese college students.中文大学生智能手机成瘾量表短版(SAS-SV)的翻译与心理计量学评估。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 29;17(11):e0278092. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278092. eCollection 2022.
8
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the empathy quotient among Chinese minority college students.中国少数民族大学生中文版共情商数的心理测量学特性
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2018 Sep 19;17:38. doi: 10.1186/s12991-018-0209-z. eCollection 2018.
9
Constructing a critical thinking evaluation framework for college students majoring in the humanities.构建人文专业大学生批判性思维评价框架。
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 25;13:1017885. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1017885. eCollection 2022.
10
[The Fear of Negative Evaluation scale (FNE): psychometric properties of the French version].[恐惧负面评价量表(FNE):法语版的心理测量特性]
Encephale. 2004 Nov-Dec;30(6):517-24. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95465-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Examining the relationship between shame and social anxiety disorder: A systematic review.探讨羞耻感与社交焦虑障碍的关系:系统综述。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2021 Dec;90:102088. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102088. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
2
A pilot study of intensive 7-day internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for social anxiety disorder.一项密集型 7 天互联网认知行为疗法治疗社交焦虑障碍的初步研究。
J Anxiety Disord. 2021 Dec;84:102473. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2021.102473. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
3
A randomized clinical trial of group and individual Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy approaches for Social Anxiety Disorder.
针对社交焦虑障碍的团体和个体认知行为疗法方法的随机临床试验。
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2020 Jan-Apr;20(1):29-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2019.11.004. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
4
Practitioner Review: Anxiety disorders in children and young people - assessment and treatment.从业者综述:儿童和青少年焦虑障碍——评估与治疗。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;61(6):628-643. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13186. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
5
Predictors of treatment outcomes and adherence in internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for social anxiety in China.中国基于互联网的认知行为疗法治疗社交焦虑症的疗效和依从性预测因素。
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2020 May;48(3):291-303. doi: 10.1017/S1352465819000730. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
6
Commentary: Forgetting the best when predicting the worst: preliminary observations on neural circuit function in adolescent social anxiety.评论:在预测最坏情况时忘记了最好的情况:青少年社交焦虑中神经回路功能的初步观察
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 11;9:1088. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01088. eCollection 2018.
7
Understanding Social Anxiety Disorder in Adolescents and Improving Treatment Outcomes: Applying the Cognitive Model of Clark and Wells (1995).理解青少年社交焦虑障碍并改善治疗效果:应用克拉克和威尔斯的认知模型(1995 年)。
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2018 Sep;21(3):388-414. doi: 10.1007/s10567-018-0258-5.
8
Social anxiety disorder: looking back and moving forward.社交焦虑障碍:回顾与展望。
Psychol Med. 2018 Sep;48(12):1937-1944. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717003816. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
9
Co-rumination buffers the link between social anxiety and depressive symptoms in early adolescence.共同反复思考缓冲了青少年早期社交焦虑与抑郁症状之间的联系。
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2017 Aug 22;11:41. doi: 10.1186/s13034-017-0179-y. eCollection 2017.
10
Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Combined Social Phobia Scale and Social Interaction Anxiety Scale: Support for a Bifactor Model.社交恐惧症量表与社交互动焦虑量表合并版的验证性因素分析:对双因素模型的支持
Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 2;8:70. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00070. eCollection 2017.