Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, 75 Kneeland Street, Suite 1100, Boston, MA 02111, United States.
N Biotechnol. 2012 Sep 15;29(6):751-6. doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2012.02.001. Epub 2012 Feb 19.
The number of personalized medicines and companion diagnostics in use in the United States has gradually increased over the past decade, from a handful of medicines and tests in 2001 to several dozen in 2011. However, the numbers have not reached the potential hoped for when the human genome project was completed in 2001. Significant clinical, regulatory, and economic barriers exist and persist. From a regulatory perspective, therapeutics and companion diagnostics are ideally developed simultaneously, with the clinical significance of the diagnostic established using data from the clinical development program of the corresponding therapeutic. Nevertheless, this is not (yet) happening. Most personalized medicines are personalized post hoc, that is, a companion diagnostic is developed separately and approved after the therapeutic. This is due in part to a separate and more complex regulatory process for diagnostics coupled with a lack of clear regulatory guidance. More importantly, payers have placed restrictions on reimbursement of personalized medicines and their companion diagnostics, given the lack of evidence on the clinical utility of many tests. To achieve increased clinical adoption of diagnostics and targeted therapies through more favorable reimbursement and incorporation in clinical practice guidelines, regulators will need to provide unambiguous guidance and manufacturers will need to bring more and better clinical evidence to the market place.
在过去的十年中,美国使用的个性化药物和伴随诊断的数量逐渐增加,从 2001 年的少数几种药物和检测方法增加到 2011 年的几十种。然而,这些数字并没有达到 2001 年人类基因组计划完成时所期望的那样。目前仍然存在重大的临床、监管和经济障碍。从监管的角度来看,治疗药物和伴随诊断理想情况下是同时开发的,诊断的临床意义是通过相应治疗药物的临床开发计划中的数据来确定的。然而,这并没有(还没有)发生。大多数个性化药物都是事后个体化的,也就是说,伴随诊断是单独开发的,并在治疗药物获得批准后获得批准。这部分是由于诊断的监管程序单独且更复杂,加上缺乏明确的监管指导。更重要的是,由于许多检测方法的临床实用性缺乏证据,支付方限制了对个性化药物及其伴随诊断的报销。为了通过更有利的报销和纳入临床实践指南来增加诊断和靶向治疗的临床应用,监管机构将需要提供明确的指导,而制造商将需要向市场提供更多和更好的临床证据。