• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Why the Shift? Taking a Closer Look at the Growing Interest in Niche Markets and Personalized Medicine.为何会出现这种转变?深入探究对利基市场和个性化医疗日益增长的兴趣。
World Med Health Policy. 2015 Mar;7(1):3-27. doi: 10.1002/wmh3.131.
2
Orphan drug incentives in the pharmacogenomic context: policy responses in the US and Canada.药物基因组学背景下的罕见病药物激励措施:美国和加拿大的政策回应
J Law Biosci. 2015 Apr 19;2(2):263-291. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsv013. eCollection 2015 Jul.
3
Pharmaceutical market access in emerging markets: concepts, components, and future.新兴市场中的药品市场准入:概念、组成部分及未来。
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2014 Dec 1;2. doi: 10.3402/jmahp.v2.25302. eCollection 2014.
4
The Influence of Emerging Markets on the Pharmaceutical Industry.新兴市场对制药行业的影响。
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2017 Apr 18;86:19-22. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2017.04.005. eCollection 2017.
5
Strategies of stratification: Regulating market access in the era of personalized medicine.分层策略:个性化医疗时代的市场准入监管
Soc Stud Sci. 2021 Aug;51(4):628-653. doi: 10.1177/03063127211005539. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
6
The United States pork niche market phenomenon.美国猪肉小众市场现象。
J Anim Sci. 2006 Aug;84(8):2269-75. doi: 10.2527/jas.2005-680.
7
The promise of pharmacogenetics: assessing the prospects for disease and patient stratification.药物遗传学的前景:评估疾病和患者分层的前景。
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2006 Sep;37(3):583-601. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2006.06.002. Epub 2006 Aug 23.
8
Niche markets and evidence assessment in transition: a critical review of proposed drug reforms.转型中的利基市场与证据评估:对拟议药物改革的批判性审视
Med Law Rev. 2014 Spring;22(2):200-20. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwu005.
9
Developing a patient-directed policy framework for managing orphan and ultra-orphan drugs throughout their lifecycle.制定一个以患者为导向的政策框架,用于管理罕见病药物和超罕见病药物的整个生命周期。
Patient. 2015 Feb;8(1):103-17. doi: 10.1007/s40271-014-0108-6.
10
Managing the health care market in developing countries: prospects and problems.发展中国家医疗保健市场的管理:前景与问题
Health Policy Plan. 1994 Sep;9(3):237-51. doi: 10.1093/heapol/9.3.237.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethical challenges and opportunities in the development and approval of novel therapeutics for rare diseases.罕见病新型疗法研发与审批中的伦理挑战与机遇。
J Med Access. 2023 Jun 6;7:27550834231177507. doi: 10.1177/27550834231177507. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
2
The Importance of and Challenges with Adopting Life-Cycle Regulation and Reimbursement in Canada.加拿大采用全生命周期监管和报销的重要性和挑战。
Healthc Policy. 2022 Feb;17(3):81-90. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2022.26726.
3
Pharmacogenomics Implementation and Hurdles to Overcome; In the Context of a Developing Country.药物基因组学的实施与需克服的障碍;以一个发展中国家为背景
Iran J Pharm Res. 2021 Fall;20(4):92-106. doi: 10.22037/ijpr.2021.114899.15091.
4
Cost-effectiveness of treatment optimisation with biomarkers for immunotherapy in solid tumours: a systematic review protocol.基于生物标志物的免疫治疗优化治疗的成本效益:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 8;11(9):e048141. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048141.
5
Adverse Events Related to Off-Label Drugs Using Spontaneous Adverse Event Reporting Systems.使用自发不良事件报告系统报告的与超说明书用药相关的不良事件
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2021 Aug 21;17:877-887. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S321789. eCollection 2021.
6
Access to High Cost Cancer Medicines Through the Lens of an Australian Senate Inquiry-Defining the "Goods" at Stake.透过澳大利亚参议院调查视角看高成本癌症药物的获取——界定利益相关的“商品”
J Bioeth Inq. 2017 Sep;14(3):401-410. doi: 10.1007/s11673-017-9800-2. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
7
New developments in anti-sickling agents: can drugs directly prevent the polymerization of sickle haemoglobin in vivo?抗镰状化药物的新进展:药物能否在体内直接阻止镰状血红蛋白的聚合?
Br J Haematol. 2016 Oct;175(1):24-30. doi: 10.1111/bjh.14264. Epub 2016 Sep 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Personalized medicine: the absence of 'model-changing' financial incentives.个性化医疗:缺乏“改变模式”的经济激励措施。
Per Med. 2007 Feb;4(1):73-81. doi: 10.2217/17410541.4.1.73.
2
Niche markets and evidence assessment in transition: a critical review of proposed drug reforms.转型中的利基市场与证据评估:对拟议药物改革的批判性审视
Med Law Rev. 2014 Spring;22(2):200-20. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwu005.
3
Personalized medicine and rescuing "unsafe" drugs with pharmacogenomics: a regulatory perspective.个性化医疗以及用药基因组学助力“不安全”药物的挽救:监管视角
Food Drug Law J. 2010;65(1):37-65, i-ii.
4
When everyone is an orphan: against adopting a U.S.-styled orphan drug policy in Canada.当人人都是孤儿:反对在加拿大采用美国式孤儿药政策。
Account Res. 2013;20(4):227-69. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2013.793120.
5
The price of drugs for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a reflection of the unsustainable prices of cancer drugs: from the perspective of a large group of CML experts.慢性髓性白血病(CML)药物的价格反映了癌症药物的不可持续价格:从一大群 CML 专家的角度来看。
Blood. 2013 May 30;121(22):4439-42. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-03-490003. Epub 2013 Apr 25.
6
Drug development: Innovation or imitation deficit?药物研发:创新还是模仿不足?
BMJ. 2012 Sep 4;345:e5880. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5880.
7
Pharmaceutical research and development: what do we get for all that money?药物研发:我们投入那么多资金,收获了什么?
BMJ. 2012 Aug 7;345:e4348. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e4348.
8
Forty years of translational cancer research.四十年癌症转化研究。
Cancer Discov. 2011 Oct;1(5):383-90. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-11-0196.
9
Potential of adaptive clinical trial designs in pharmacogenetic research.药物遗传学研究中适应性临床试验设计的潜力。
Pharmacogenomics. 2012 Apr;13(5):571-8. doi: 10.2217/pgs.12.10.
10
Overcoming regulatory and economic challenges facing pharmacogenomics.克服药物基因组学面临的监管和经济挑战。
N Biotechnol. 2012 Sep 15;29(6):751-6. doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2012.02.001. Epub 2012 Feb 19.

为何会出现这种转变?深入探究对利基市场和个性化医疗日益增长的兴趣。

Why the Shift? Taking a Closer Look at the Growing Interest in Niche Markets and Personalized Medicine.

作者信息

Gibson Shannon, Raziee Hamid R, Lemmens Trudo

出版信息

World Med Health Policy. 2015 Mar;7(1):3-27. doi: 10.1002/wmh3.131.

DOI:10.1002/wmh3.131
PMID:25914853
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4405057/
Abstract

Pharmaceutical research and development is increasingly focused on niche markets, most notably treatments for rare diseases and "personalized" medicine. Drawing on the results of a qualitative study of 34 key Canadian stakeholders (including drug regulators, funders, scientists, policy experts, pharmaceutical industry representatives, and patient advocates), we explore the major trends that are reportedly contributing to the growing interest of the pharmaceutical industry in niche markets. Informed by both these key informant interviews and a review of the relevant literature, our paper provides a critical analysis of the many different-and sometimes conflicting-views on the reasons for and extent of the shift toward niche markets. We consider some of the potential advantages to industry, as well the important implications and risks that arise from the increasing pursuit of niche markets and pharmacogenomics. While there are many potential benefits associated with targeted therapies and drug development for historically neglected rare diseases, niche market therapies also present evidentiary challenges (e.g., smaller clinical trials and enrichment strategies) that can make approval decisions difficult, and uncertainties remain around the true benefits of many therapies.

摘要

制药研发越来越关注细分市场,最显著的是针对罕见疾病的治疗和“个性化”药物。基于对34位加拿大关键利益相关者(包括药品监管机构、资助者、科学家、政策专家、制药行业代表和患者权益倡导者)的定性研究结果,我们探讨了据报道促使制药行业对细分市场兴趣日益浓厚的主要趋势。基于这些关键信息提供者访谈以及对相关文献的回顾,我们的论文对关于向细分市场转变的原因和程度的许多不同且有时相互冲突的观点进行了批判性分析。我们考虑了对行业的一些潜在优势,以及因越来越多地追求细分市场和药物基因组学而产生的重要影响和风险。虽然针对历史上被忽视的罕见疾病的靶向治疗和药物开发有许多潜在益处,但细分市场疗法也带来了证据方面的挑战(例如,规模较小的临床试验和富集策略),这可能使批准决策变得困难,而且许多疗法的真正益处仍存在不确定性。